scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Ring of integers

About: Ring of integers is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1856 publications have been published within this topic receiving 15882 citations.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1993
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply Faltings's version of Siegel's Lemma (see Ch. X, Lemma 4) and obtain lattices in things like г(X k m, line bundle).
Abstract: In this chapter we will follow §5 of [22] quite closely. We start in the following situation: k is a number field, A k is an abelian variety over k, X k ⊂ A k is a subvariety such that \( X_{\bar k} \) does not contain any translate of a positive dimensional abelian subvariety of \( A_{\bar k} \), m is a sufficiently large integer as in Chapter IX, Lemma 1 Let R be the ring of integers in k. Since we want to apply Faltings’s version of Siegel’s Lemma (see Ch. X, Lemma 4) we need lattices in things like г(X k m , line bundle). We obtain such lattices as: г(proper model of X k m over R, extension of line bundle).

7 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, a ring graded by a group is defined as a ring-theoretic property and the following general question is raised: how to define the graded version of the property $P$ in a meaningful way?
Abstract: We raise the following general question regarding a ring graded by a group: "If $P$ is a ring-theoretic property, how does one define the graded version $P_{\operatorname{gr}}$ of the property $P$ in a meaningful way?". Some properties of rings have straightforward and unambiguous generalizations to their graded versions and these generalizations satisfy all the matching properties of the nongraded case. If $P$ is either being unit-regular, having stable range 1 or being directly finite, that is not the case. The first part of the paper addresses this issue. Searching for appropriate generalizations, we consider graded versions of cancellation, internal cancellation, substitution, and module-theoretic direct finiteness. In the second part of the paper, we turn to Leavitt path algebras. If $K$ is a trivially graded field and $E$ is an oriented graph, the Leavitt path algebra $L_K(E)$ is naturally graded by the ring of integers. If $E$ is a finite graph, we present a property of $E$ which is equivalent with $L_K(E)$ being graded unit-regular. This property critically depends on the lengths of paths to cycles making it stand out from other known graph conditions which characterize algebraic properties of $L_K(E).$ It also further illustrates that graded unit-regularity is quite restrictive in comparison to the alternative generalization of unit-regularity which we consider in the first part of the paper.

7 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that for positive rational integers, the polynomial x2 + x + A is prime for x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, A − 2.

7 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the ring of all endomorphisms of J(C_{f,p}) coincides with Z[\zeta_p] under the assumption that either n=p+1 or p does not divide n(n-1).
Abstract: Let K be a field of characteristic zero, n>4 an integer, f(x) an irreducible polynomial over K of degree n, whose Galois group is doubly transitive simple non-abelian group. Let p be an odd prime, Z[\zeta_p] the ring of integers in the p-th cyclotomic field, C_{f,p}:y^p=f(x) the corresponding superelliptic curve and J(C_{f,p}) its jacobian. Assuming that either n=p+1 or p does not divide n(n-1), we prove that the ring of all endomorphisms of J(C_{f,p}) coincides with Z[\zeta_p].

7 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, the interplay between probability, number theory, and geometry in the context of relatively prime integers in the ring of integers of a number field was studied, and it was shown that the Dedekind zeta function over the Gaussian integers can be computed in a lattice-theoretic approach.
Abstract: This paper studies the interplay between probability, number theory, and geometry in the context of relatively prime integers in the ring of integers of a number field. In particular, probabilistic ideas are coupled together with integer lattices and the theory of zeta functions over number fields in order to show that $$P(\gcd(z_{1},z_{2})=1) = \frac{1}{\zeta_{\Q(i)}(2)}$$ where $z_{1},z_{2} \in \mathbb{Z}[i]$ are randomly chosen and $\zeta_{\Q(i)}(s)$ is the Dedekind zeta function over the Gaussian integers. Our proof outlines a lattice-theoretic approach to proving the generalization of this theorem to arbitrary number fields that are principal ideal domains.

7 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Algebraic geometry
8.7K papers, 205K citations
89% related
Conjecture
24.3K papers, 366K citations
86% related
Elliptic curve
13.9K papers, 255.3K citations
86% related
Automorphism
15.5K papers, 190.6K citations
86% related
Polynomial
52.6K papers, 853.1K citations
85% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202310
202250
2021117
2020121
2019111
201896