Sacroiliitis

About: Sacroiliitis is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 1927 publications have been published within this topic receiving 47558 citations.

The European spondylarthropathy study group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy

Abstract: Classification criteria for most of the disorders belonging to the spondylarthropathy group already exist. However, the spectrum of spondylarthropathy is wider than the sum of these disorders suggests. Seronegative oligoarthritis, dactylitis or polyarthritis of the lower extremities, heel pain due to enthesitis, and other undifferentiated cases of spondylarthropathy have been ignored in epidemiologic studies because of the inadequacy of existing criteria. In order to define classification criteria that also encompass patients with undifferentiated spondylarthropathy, we studied 403 patients with all forms of spondylarthropathy and 674 control patients with other rheumatic diseases. The diagnoses were based on the local clinical expert's opinion. The 403 patients included 168 with ankylosing spondylitis, 68 with psoriatic arthritis, 41 with reactive arthritis, 17 with inflammatory bowel disease and arthritis, and 109 with unclassified spondylarthropathy. Based on statistical analysis and clinical reasoning, we propose the following classification criteria for spondylarthropathy: inflammatory spinal pain or synovitis (asymmetric or predominantly in the lower limbs), together with at least 1 of the following: positive family history, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, urethritis, or acute diarrhea, alternating buttock pain, enthesopathy, or sacroiliitis as determined from radiography of the pelvic region. These criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 87%. The proposed classification criteria are easy to apply in clinical practice and performed well in all 7 participating centers. However, we regard them as preliminary until they have been further evaluated in other settings.

Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA‐B27 positive and negative blood donors

Abstract: Objective To determine the overall prevalence of spondylarthropathy (SpA) among whites. Methods To screen for SpA symptoms, such as inflammatory back pain (IBP), joint swelling, psoriasis, and uveitis, or a specific family history, questionnaires were mailed to 348 blood donors (174 HLA-B27 positive and 174 HLA-B27 negative). From the responding 273 persons (78%; 140 B27 positive, 133 B27 negative), 126 were selected for further evaluation based on the symptoms reported. Of this group, 90 persons agreed to undergo physical examination (71.4%; 46 B27 positive, 44 B27 negative). There was no difference between the B27-positive and -negative groups in terms of age (mean ± SD 38.4 ± 10 versus 39.5 ± 11 years) and sex ratio (67% versus 68% were men). In addition, 58 donors (32 B27 positive, 26 B27 negative) agreed to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints. A diagnosis of SpA and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) was made according to the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group criteria and the New York criteria. Results SpA was diagnosed in 20 persons: 19 of 140 B27-positive (13.6%) and 1 of 133 B27-negative (0.7%) subjects (15 male and 5 female). AS was diagnosed in 9 persons (7 male and 2 female; 45%), undifferentiated SpA (USpA) in 7 (5 male and 2 female; 35%), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 3 (2 male and 1 female; 15%), and chronic reactive arthritis (ReA; Reiter's syndrome) in 1 (male; 5%). On the basis of a B27 frequency of 9.3% among the population of Berlin (3.47 million persons), the estimated prevalence of SpA was 1.9%, AS was 0.86%, USpA was 0.67%, and PsA was 0.29%. The relative risk of developing SpA in B27-positive subjects was calculated as 20.7 (95% confidence interval 4.6-94.2; P = 0.001). Of 58 persons with IBP, sacroiliitis was detected by MRI in 15 of 32 B27-positive (46.9%) and 1 of 26 B27-negative (3.9%) subjects (P = 0.002). Four of these 16 donors did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for SpA. Conclusion With a calculated prevalence of 1.9%, spondylarthropathies are among the most frequent rheumatic diseases in the white population. HLA-B27 positive persons carry a 20-fold increased risk of developing SpA. AS and USpA are the most frequent SpA subtypes. Persons with IBP who are B27 positive have a 50% likelihood of having sacroiliitis.

The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal

Abstract: Objective: Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) is characterised by a lack of definitive radiographic sacroiliitis and is considered an early stage of ankylosing spondylitis. The objective of this study was to develop candidate classification criteria for axial SpA that include patients with but also without radiographic sacroiliitis. Methods: Seventy-one patients with possible axial SpA, most of whom were lacking definite radiographic sacroiliitis, were reviewed as “paper patients” by 20 experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Unequivocally classifiable patients were identified based on the aggregate expert opinion in conjunction with the expert-reported level of certainty of their judgement. Draft criteria for axial SpA were formulated and tested using classifiable patients. Results: Active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (odds ratio 45, 95% CI 5.3 to 383; p x rays in conjunction with one SpA feature or, if sacroilitiis is absent, in the presence of at least three SpA features. In a second set of candidate criteria, inflammatory back pain is obligatory in the clinical arm (sensitivity 86.1%; specificity 94.7%). Conclusion: The ASAS group has developed candidate criteria for the classification of axial SpA that include patients without radiographic sacroiliitis. The candidate criteria need to be validated in an independent international study.

Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group

Abstract: Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints has evolved as the most relevant imaging modality for diagnosis and classification of early axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) including early ankylosing spondylitis Objectives: To identify and describe MRI findings in sacroiliitis and to reach consensus on which MRI findings are essential for the definition of sacroiliitis Methods: Ten doctors (two radiologists and eight rheumatologists) from the ASAS/OMERACT MRI working group reviewed and discussed in three workshops MR images depicting sacroiliitis associated with SpA and other conditions which may mimic SpA Descriptions of the pathological findings and technical requirements for the appropriate acquisition were formulated In a consensual approach MRI findings considered to be essential for sacroiliitis were defined Results: Active inflammatory lesions such as bone marrow oedema (BMO)/osteitis, synovitis, enthesitis and capsulitis associated with SpA can be detected by MRI Among these, the clear presence of BMO/osteitis was considered essential for defining active sacroiliitis Structural damage lesions such as sclerosis, erosions, fat deposition and ankylosis can also be detected by MRI At present, however, the exact place of structural damage lesions for diagnosis and classification is less clear, particularly if these findings are minor The ASAS group formally approved these proposals by voting at the annual assembly Conclusions: For the first time, MRI findings relevant for sacroiliitis have been defined by consensus by a group of rheumatologists and radiologists These definitions should help in applying correctly the imaging feature “active sacroiliitis by MRI” in the new ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA

The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort.

Abstract: Objective Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is diagnosed late, because radiographs of the sacroiliac joints often do not show definite sacroiliitis at the time of disease onset. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients without definite radiographically defined sacroiliitis, referred to as nonradiographic axial spondylarthritis (SpA), are different from patients with AS with regard to clinical manifestations and disease activity measures. Moreover, we sought to identify determinants of the development of radiographic sacroiliitis. Methods In a cross-sectional analysis of 462 patients, we compared 226 patients with nonradiographic axial SpA (symptom duration ≤5 years) and 236 patients with AS (symptom duration ≤10 years) who are participants in the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Radiographs of the sacroiliac joints and the spine were assessed by 2 readers in a blinded manner. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify parameters associated with structural damage. Results The 2 groups did not differ in the frequency of HLA–B27 positivity, inflammatory back pain, arthritis, enthesitis, and uveitis and had similar levels of disease activity, using measures such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. In both groups, HLA–B27 positivity determined the age at disease onset. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.19–4.73 [P = 0.014]) and an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level (adjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.96–3.56 [P = 0.066]) were associated with radiographic sacroiliitis. In patients with AS, male sex and an elevated CRP level were also associated with the presence of syndesmophytes. Conclusion Clinical manifestations and disease activity measures are highly comparable between patients with early nonradiographic axial SpA and those with early AS, suggesting that these 2 entities are part of the same disease. Male sex and an elevated CRP level are associated with structural damage on radiographs, whereas HLA–B27 positivity determines the age at disease onset.