scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Semantic Web

About: Semantic Web is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 26987 publications have been published within this topic receiving 534275 citations. The topic is also known as: Sem Web & SemWeb.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Sep 2008
TL;DR: This paper explores the use of a semantic relatedness measure between words, that uses the Web as knowledge source, and defines a new semanticrelatedness measure among ontology terms that fulfils the above mentioned desirable properties to be used on the Semantic Web.
Abstract: Semantic relatedness measures quantify the degree in which some words or concepts are related, considering not only similarity but any possible semantic relationship among them Relatedness computation is of great interest in different areas, such as Natural Language Processing, Information Retrieval, or the Semantic Web Different methods have been proposed in the past; however, current relatedness measures lack some desirable properties for a new generation of Semantic Web applications: maximum coverage, domain independence, and universality In this paper, we explore the use of a semantic relatedness measure between words, that uses the Web as knowledge source This measure exploits the information about frequencies of use provided by existing search engines Furthermore, taking this measure as basis, we define a new semantic relatedness measure among ontology terms The proposed measure fulfils the above mentioned desirable properties to be used on the Semantic Web We have tested extensively this semantic measure to show that it correlates well with human judgment, and helps solving some particular tasks, as word sense disambiguation or ontology matching

148 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work presents a novel semantic level interoperability architecture for pervasive computing and IoTs that conforms to the common IoT-A architecture reference model (ARM), and maps the central components of the architecture to the IoT-ARM.
Abstract: Pervasive computing and Internet of Things (IoTs) paradigms have created a huge potential for new business. To fully realize this potential, there is a need for a common way to abstract the heterogeneity of devices so that their functionality can be represented as a virtual computing platform. To this end, we present novel semantic level interoperability architecture for pervasive computing and IoTs. There are two main principles in the proposed architecture. First, information and capabilities of devices are represented with semantic web knowledge representation technologies and interaction with devices and the physical world is achieved by accessing and modifying their virtual representations. Second, global IoT is divided into numerous local smart spaces managed by a semantic information broker (SIB) that provides a means to monitor and update the virtual representation of the physical world. An integral part of the architecture is a resolution infrastructure that provides a means to resolve the network address of a SIB either using a physical object identifier as a pointer to information or by searching SIBs matching a specification represented with SPARQL. We present several reference implementations and applications that we have developed to evaluate the architecture in practice. The evaluation also includes performance studies that, together with the applications, demonstrate the suitability of the architecture to real-life IoT scenarios. In addition, to validate that the proposed architecture conforms to the common IoT-A architecture reference model (ARM), we map the central components of the architecture to the IoT-ARM.

148 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
07 Nov 2005
TL;DR: Compared with existing methods, the approach can acquire ontology from relational database automatically by using a group of learning rules instead of using a middle model and can obtain OWL ontology, including the classes, properties, properties characteristics, cardinality and instances, while none of existing methods can acquire all of them.
Abstract: Ontology provides a shared and reusable piece of knowledge about a specific domain, and has been applied in many fields, such as semantic Web, e-commerce and information retrieval, etc. However, building ontology by hand is a very hard and error-prone task. Learning ontology from existing resources is a good solution. Because relational database is widely used for storing data and OWL is the latest standard recommended by W3C, this paper proposes an approach of learning OWL ontology from data in relational database. Compared with existing methods, the approach can acquire ontology from relational database automatically by using a group of learning rules instead of using a middle model. In addition, it can obtain OWL ontology, including the classes, properties, properties characteristics, cardinality and instances, while none of existing methods can acquire all of them. The proposed learning rules have been proven to be correct by practice.

147 citations

01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: This paper discusses existing evaluation metrics, and proposes a new method for evaluating the ontology population task, which is general enough to be used in a variety of situations, yet more precise than many current metrics.
Abstract: The evaluation of the quality of ontological classification is an important part of semantic web technology. Because this area is under constant development, it requires improvement and standardisation. This paper discusses existing evaluation metrics, and proposes a new method for evaluating the ontology population task, which is general enough to be used in a variety of situations, yet more precise than many current metrics. The paper further describes our first eorts in operationalising the evaluation procedure, including the creation of a semantically annotated corpus that will function as a test bed for the proposed evaluation mechanism, and comparison of dierent evaluation metrics. We conclude that for ontology-based evaluation, a more complex mechanism than is traditionally used is preferable. This mechanism aims to drive a benchmarking assessment tool for the current state-of-the-art of ontology population, and to set a standard for best practice for future evaluation of human language technology for the semantic web.

147 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jun 2008
TL;DR: The proposed system allows to retrieve data using SPARQL queries, data sources can register and abandon freely, and all RDF Schema or OWL vocabularies can be used to describe their data, as long as they are accessible on the Web.
Abstract: In this contribution a system is presented, which provides access to distributed data sources using Semantic Web technology. While it was primarily designed for data sharing and scientific collaboration, it is regarded as a base technology useful for many other Semantic Web applications. The proposed system allows to retrieve data using SPARQL queries, data sources can register and abandon freely, and all RDF Schema or OWL vocabularies can be used to describe their data, as long as they are accessible on the Web. Data heterogeneity is addressed by RDF-wrappers like D2R-Server placed on top of local information systems. A query does not directly refer to actual endpoints, instead it contains graph patterns adhering to a virtual data set. A mediator finally pulls and joins RDF data from different endpoints providing a transparent on-the-fly view to the end-user. The SPARQL protocol has been defined to enable systematic data access to remote endpoints. However, remote SPARQL queries require the explicit notion of endpoint URIs. The presented system allows users to execute queries without the need to specify target endpoints. Additionally, it is possible to execute join and union operations across different remote endpoints. The optimization of such distributed operations is a key factor concerning the performance of the overall system. Therefore, proven concepts from database research can be applied.

147 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Web service
57.6K papers, 989K citations
89% related
Web page
50.3K papers, 975.1K citations
87% related
Graph (abstract data type)
69.9K papers, 1.2M citations
84% related
Scalability
50.9K papers, 931.6K citations
83% related
Server
79.5K papers, 1.4M citations
82% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023116
2022348
2021412
2020612
2019782
2018881