scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Semen analysis

About: Semen analysis is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 4909 publications have been published within this topic receiving 143225 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The relationship between the distribution of the sperm subpopulations and individual buck, total motility, and sperm concentration shows that the spermatozoa of each have different motility patterns, which could lead to a substantial increase in information acquired during caprine semen analysis.

51 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: With increasing durations of abstinence from ejaculation before the tests there were significant increases in semen volume and sperm concentration, and significant changes in results accompanied repeated testing, notably rises in sperm concentration and motility.
Abstract: UNLABELLED Infertile men who had 3 or more semen analyses performed in one laboratory were placed in 2 groups (I) oligozoospermic group (n = 106), mean sperm concentration between 1 and 20 million/ml (II) asthenozoospermic group (n = 71), mean sperm concentration greater than 20 million/ml, and mean motility less than 60%. With increasing durations of abstinence from ejaculation before the tests there were significant increases in semen volume and sperm concentration. Semen volume increased over the first 4 days to a similar extent in both groups. Sperm concentrations increased over 15 days, but the effect of abstinence was much greater in the asthenozoospermic group than in the oligozoospermic group (14% compared with 1.4% of the within subject variation). Significant changes in results accompanied repeated testing, notably rises in sperm concentration and motility. Sperm motility was lower in winter and higher in summer in both groups and also, but to a lesser extent, in artificial insemination donors who collected semen in the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS duration of abstinence, the elapse of time and seasonal temperature changes affect semen analysis results, and therefore controls for these variables must be incorporated in any therapeutic trial for male infertility. On the other hand, they only account for a small proportion of the total variability and thus routine correction of results would not greatly improve the value of semen analysis in the prediction of fertility. Furthermore because differences in the duration of abstinence have only a small effect on sperm concentration in oligozoospermic men, restricting sexual intercourse to the time of ovulation may not enhance fertility.

51 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Current at‐home sperm analysis technologies are examined and compared to the traditional laboratory‐based methods and their limitations and future directions are described.
Abstract: With about 70 million cases of infertility worldwide, half of which are caused by male factors, sperm analysis is critical to determine male fertility potential. Conventional semen analysis methods involve complex and manual inspection with a microscope, and these methods are labor intensive and can take several days. Due to unavailability of rapid, convenient, and user-friendly semen analysis tools, many men do not seek medical evaluation, especially in resource-constrained settings. Furthermore, as conventional methods have to be conducted in the laboratories, many men are unwilling to be tested as a result of social stigma in certain regions of the world. One solution can be found in at-home sperm analysis, which allows men to test their semen without the hassle of going to and paying for a clinic. Herein, we examine current at-home sperm analysis technologies and compare them to the traditional laboratory-based methods. In addition, we discuss emerging sperm analysis approaches and describe their limitations and future directions.

51 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There was an inverse relation between mean percentage of sperm and coefficients of variation between laboratories for sperm motility, morphology and vitality and the urgent need for improvement in the overall quality of andrology testing is highlighted.
Abstract: Purpose: Results from an external quality control programme for semen analysis carried out in Spain are analysed.

51 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The presence of asymptomatic bacteriospermia did not correlate with abnormal semen parameters and its impact on semen parameters among infertile men was found to be insignificant.
Abstract: Introduction. Semen analysis is considered as the surrogate marker for male fecundity while assessing infertile men. There are several reasons for altered semen quality and bacteriospermia could be one among them. Thereby the aim of our work is to study the semen culture and its impact on semen parameters among infertile men. Materials and Methods. Semen samples were collected from men attending infertility clinic. Semen parameters were analysed based on WHO guidelines. Also, samples were subjected to culture using standard bacteriological techniques. Results. A total of 85 samples were collected. A number of 47 (55.30%) had normal sperm count, 37 (43.50%) had oligozoospermia, and one (1.17%) had azoospermia. Teratozoospermia was the most common abnormality observed (81.17%) followed by asthenozoospermia (28.23%). The prevalence of bacteriospermia was 35.3%. Enterococcus faecalis (30%) was the most common organism isolated followed by Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (23.33%), Staphylococcus aureus (20%), and E. coli (10%). Other less frequently isolated organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae (6.66%), Proteus sp. (6.66%), and Citrobacter sp. (3.33%). Conclusion. The presence of asymptomatic bacteriospermia did not correlate with abnormal semen parameters.

51 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Sperm
43.4K papers, 1.3M citations
88% related
Luteinizing hormone
23.9K papers, 756K citations
82% related
Androgen
18.9K papers, 798.4K citations
81% related
Testosterone
23.2K papers, 808K citations
80% related
Androgen receptor
15.9K papers, 659K citations
78% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023166
2022338
2021229
2020245
2019202
2018233