scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Shadow (psychology)

About: Shadow (psychology) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 8396 publications have been published within this topic receiving 117158 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors assess differentiated upper secondary education with homogeneous student backgrounds and find that a high concentration of students from families of higher socioeconomic sta... and a high proportion of students who come from families from higher socioeconomic strata.
Abstract: By assessing differentiated upper secondary education with homogeneous student backgrounds, previous studies indicate that a high concentration of students from families of higher socioeconomic sta...

29 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined how the use of shadow IT in product costing impacts managers' perceptions of information credibility and managerial decision making, and they found that participants view information from shadow IT systems as less credible and they are less impacted by and less willing to rely on costing reports produced by shadow IT versus non-shadow IT systems.
Abstract: SYNOPSIS Business trends show that more and more employees are creating shadow IT systems—IT systems that are not sanctioned or monitored by the IT department. This paper examines how the use of shadow IT in product costing impacts managers' perceptions of information credibility and managerial decision making. Using two experiments, we find that participants view information from shadow IT systems as less credible and they are less impacted by and less willing to rely on costing reports produced from shadow IT systems versus non-shadow IT systems. We also find that although participants are concerned about the credibility of shadow IT systems, they are not more likely to find simple mathematical errors embedded in shadow IT costing reports relative to non-shadow IT reports. This suggests that although concerned about shadow IT systems, managers still do not exercise sufficient care in evaluating reports created using these systems. The results of our study should prove informative as shadow systems becom...

29 citations

01 Jan 2003
Abstract: This paper examines China’s changing security relations with Southeast Asia. It begins by highlighting the growing complexity of the relationship, marked by conflicting pulls of cooperation and rivalry. This is followed by cases studies of the South China Sea dispute and the extent of the economic competition between China and Southeast Asia. The paper then assesses Chinese power projection capabilities in Southeast Asia, identifying its scope and limitations. The final section looks at strategies adopted by ASEAN members to “engage” China, especially through regional institutions such as the ASEAN Regional Forum and ASEAN Plus Three. The main argument of the paper is as follows. China’s relations with Southeast Asia have been, and will continue to be marked by a mix of competition and collaboration. In the short-term, ASEAN states will seek to accommodate China and try to benefit from economic linkages with China’s booming economy. At the same time, China’s rising power will remain a concern, and ASEAN will seek avenues for dealing with a security challenge from China through a mix of deterrence and cooperative security approaches. The key drivers for the long-term relationship, aside from China’s domestic evolution, are the nature of Sino-US rivalry, the structure of regional economic interdependence, and the evolution of cooperative security norms in the region. Southeast Asia can have some role in shaping the last two forces, but this requires greater unity and sense of purpose in ASEAN than has been evident since the 1997 Asian economic crisis.

29 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors extend the analysis to economies with formal and informal sectors and demonstrate that depending on the organization of the bureaucracy and the productivity of the informal sector, the presence of the shadow economy may have adverse effects on corruption and welfare.
Abstract: In their pioneering work on corruption, Shleifer and Vishny (1993) find that a centralized bureaucracy results in lower bribes. Our paper extends the analysis to economies with formal and informal sectors. When corrupt officials operate in both sectors, bureaucratic centralization is beneficial when confined to the formal sector; however, we show that crosssector centralization can result in higher bribes and lower welfare. Furthermore, contrary to Choi and Thum (2005), we demonstrate that, depending on the organization of the bureaucracy and the productivity of the informal sector, the presence of the shadow economy may have adverse effects on corruption and welfare.

28 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Leadership
9.8K papers, 423.3K citations
68% related
Transactional leadership
15K papers, 645.9K citations
66% related
Leadership studies
11.3K papers, 443.2K citations
66% related
Shared leadership
14.7K papers, 612.8K citations
66% related
Creativity
32K papers, 661.7K citations
66% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20242
20231,102
20222,472
2021374
2020435
2019429