scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Sister chromatid exchange

About: Sister chromatid exchange is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3187 publications have been published within this topic receiving 90029 citations. The topic is also known as: replication-born DSB repair by SCE & GO:1990414.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that BRCA2 is required for telomere homeostasis and may be particularly important for the replication of G-rich telomeric lagging strands.

45 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present findings show that individual SCE responses to treatment of cultured human lymphocytes with DEB can reliably be reproduced in repeated trials, and confirm that the GSTT1 gene but not the GSTM1 gene is important in determining individual sensitivity to the in vitro genotoxicity of DEB.
Abstract: Spontaneous and diepoxybutane (DEB)-induced sister-chromatid exchanges (SCEs) were examined in whole-blood lymphocyte cultures of 3 men and 4 women. A strong increase in mean number of SCEs per cell with increasing DEB concentrations (0, 2 and 4 μM) was observed in cultures of all subjects, but 3 of the donors were clearly more sensitive than the others. The SCE measurements were repeated 2–6 times per donor over a period of 55 months to assess the stability of the individual SCE response. The results showed that SCE induction by DEB was steady in the individuals during the follow-up at each DEB dose, with no significant differences among the repeated experiments. At 4 μM DEB, the DEB-sensitive and -resistant donors could reliably be differentiated from each other in all trials. As DEB-sensitivity has been suggested to be due to the lack of glutathione S -transferase (GST) T1, the donors were genotyped for the presence of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes. The 3 individuals found to be DEB-sensitive were all of the GSTT1 null genotype, whereas the 4 DEB-resistant donors were GSTT1 positive, which supported the role of the GSTT1 gene in determining DEB-sensitivity. Three of the DEB-resistant and none of the DEB-sensitive had the GSTM1 null genotype. Thus, the lack of the GSTM1 gene was not associated with the DEB-sensitivity trait. In conclusion, the present findings show that individual SCE responses to treatment of cultured human lymphocytes with DEB can reliably be reproduced in repeated trials. The results confirm that the GSTT1 gene but not the GSTM1 gene is important in determining individual sensitivity to the in vitro genotoxicity of DEB.

44 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Uremia was found to increase structurally abnormal chromosomes and elevate the rate of SCE, suggesting cytogenetic changes in uremia may play a role in the heightened risk of cancer.

44 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis of the kinetics of strand-break induction and closure after UV irradiation by nucleoid sedimentation reveals an accumulation of strand breaks in the presence of Co(II), which indicates that either the polymerization or the ligation step in excision repair is affected.
Abstract: In bacterial test systems, Co(II) has been shown to be antimutagenic in combination with several chemical and physical agents. To investigate whether such modulations also applu to mammalian cells, the effect of Co(II) on UV-induced mutagenesis, sister-chromatid exchanges as well as DNA damage and its removal was determined. Co(II) itself is weakly mutagenic at the HPRT locus and increases the frequency of sister-chromatid exchanges. Additionally, at both endpoints the metal ions enhance the genotoxicity of UV light. To discriminate between an enhancement of DNA damage and an interference with repair processes, the number of pyrimidine cyclobutane dimers was determined by HPLC. While the induction of these DNA lesions is not affected by Co(II), their removal is inhibited at concentrations of 75 μM Co(II) and higher. Analysis of the kinetics of strand-break induction and closure after UV irradiation by nucleoid sedimentation reveals an accumulation of strand breaks in the presence of Co(II). This indicates that either the polimerization or the ligation step in exision repair is affected. Since similar interactions with the processing of UV-induced DNA damage have been observed with other carcinogenic and/or mutagenic metal ions, this appears to be a common mechanism of metal genotoxicity.

44 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that pirimicarb and Aficida exert geno-cytotoxicity, at least in CHO-K1 cells, and the CAs appears to be a higher sensitive bioassay to detect DNA damage at lower concentrations of pirimiarb than SCEs does.

44 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
DNA damage
47K papers, 2.4M citations
84% related
DNA repair
41.5K papers, 2.4M citations
83% related
DNA
107.1K papers, 4.7M citations
77% related
Mutation
45.2K papers, 2.6M citations
76% related
Carcinogenesis
60.3K papers, 3.1M citations
75% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20238
202222
20215
202011
201914
201811