scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Sister chromatid exchange

About: Sister chromatid exchange is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3187 publications have been published within this topic receiving 90029 citations. The topic is also known as: replication-born DSB repair by SCE & GO:1990414.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that the various genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of AM are caused by different types of cellular damage and persists for several cell cycles in human cells in vitro and seems to be resistant to repair activity.
Abstract: The effects of adriamycin (AM) on DNA repair replication, the frequency of sister-chromatid exchange (SCE), the rate of cell proliferation and the frequency of DNA strand breaks were studied in human cells in vitro. No repair replication was observed in lymphocytes exposed to AM in concentrations up to 10 −3 moles/1. DNA repair replication induced by UV and alkylating agents was not affected by a concentration of AM that completely inhibited cell proliferation (10 −6 moles/1). Fibroblasts exposed to AM at 10 −4 moles/1 in the presence of hydroxyurea showed an increase of strand breaks and cross-links in DNA. When AM was added to UV-irradiated fibroblasts, there was an increase of DNA strand breaks in addition to the breaks caused by UV alone. Similar effects were observed in lymphocytes. A dose-dependent increase of SCE was observed in lymphocytes exposed to low concentrations of AM ( −7 moles/1). At higher concentrations the increase of SCE levelled off, and cell proliferation became severely inhibited. There was no evidence of removal of SCE-inducing damage in cells exposed to AM during G 0 or G 1 . The level of SCE induced in the third cell cycle after treatment with AM was not different from that induced during the first two cell cycles. These results suggest that the various genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of AM are caused by different types of cellular damage. Moreover, AM-induced DNA damage persists for several cell cycles in human cells in vitro and seems to be resistant to repair activity.

27 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 May 1970-Heredity
TL;DR: The autoradiographic analysis of exchanges in tritium-labelled meiotic chromosomes is potentially a useful approach to the study of meiotic exchange events since this method differentially labels meiotic chromatids along their entire length.
Abstract: The autoradiographic analysis of exchanges in tritium-labelled meiotic chromosomes is potentially a useful approach to the study of meiotic exchange events since this method differentially labels meiotic chromatids along their entire length. The main problem encountered in earlier autoradiographic studies is that of distinguishing label exchanges generated at chiasmata from label exchanges generated by sister chromatid exchange. This problem was overcome in the present study by the choice of a meiotic system (male meiosis of Stethophyma grossum) where chiasmata are limited to just one proximally localised chiasma in each bivalent. This system allows the positive identification of chiasma-generated label exchanges and demonstrates convincingly the origin of chiasmata through breakage and rejoining of homologous non-sister chromatids. Sister chromatid exchanges are also readily detected in labelled meiotic chromosomes of this species, where they occur with a mean frequency of 0.35 per chromosome. This frequency is similar to that found in mitotic spermatogonial cells and the exchanges are randomly distributed both within and between chromosomes. These features of meiotic sister chromatid exchanges suggest that they are unrelated to non-sister chiasmatic exchanges and they probably have no special meiotic significance.

27 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that DDX11 is a DNA helicase protecting against G4 induced double-stranded breaks and concomitant loss of cohesion, possibly at DNA replication forks.
Abstract: Warsaw Breakage Syndrome (WABS) is a rare disorder related to cohesinopathies and Fanconi anemia, caused by bi-allelic mutations in DDX11. Here, we report multiple compound heterozygous WABS cases, each displaying destabilized DDX11 protein and residual DDX11 function at the cellular level. Patient-derived cell lines exhibit sensitivity to topoisomerase and PARP inhibitors, defective sister chromatid cohesion and reduced DNA replication fork speed. Deleting DDX11 in RPE1-TERT cells inhibits proliferation and survival in a TP53-dependent manner and causes chromosome breaks and cohesion defects, independent of the expressed pseudogene DDX12p. Importantly, G-quadruplex (G4) stabilizing compounds induce chromosome breaks and cohesion defects which are strongly aggravated by inactivation of DDX11 but not FANCJ. The DNA helicase domain of DDX11 is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and resistance to G4 stabilizers. We propose that DDX11 is a DNA helicase protecting against G4 induced double-stranded breaks and concomitant loss of cohesion, possibly at DNA replication forks.

27 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is of interest that Ames Salmonella results are consistent with in vivo genotoxicity for these compounds and only the plate test version of the Ames procedure is consistent with this order.
Abstract: Sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) and chromosome aberrations (CA) in bone marrow cells were analyzed after in vivo exposure in mice to 4 aliphatic epoxides, namely 1-naphthyl glycidyl ether (NGE), 1-naphthyl propylene oxide (NPO), 4-nitrophenyl glycidyl ether (NPGE) and trichloropropylene oxide (TCPO). These compounds were selected as being among the most mutagenic aliphatic epoxides in our previous structure-mutagenicity studies with the Ames test. There were significant dose-related increases in SCE and CA results for all 4 epoxides. The order of genotoxicity as established through SCE was NGE > NPO > NPGE ≅ TCPO > solvent control. It is of interest that Ames Salmonella results are consistent with in vivo genotoxicity for these compounds. However, only the plate test version of the Ames procedure is consistent with this order of in vivo genotoxicity and neither preincubation Ames testing results nor chemical alkylation rates would have predicted this order.

27 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggested that the major and minor organic arsenic compounds contained in marine fishery products are much less cytotoxic inorganic arsenic, methylarsonic acid and dimethylarsinic acid.
Abstract: Arsenobetaine, arsenocholine, trimethylarsine oxide and tetramethylarsonium iodide, which are contained in marine fishery products, were examined for their potencies on cell growth inhibition, chromosomal aberration and sister chromatid exchange (SCE). Arsenobetaine, the major water-soluble organic arsenic compound in marine animals, exhibited very low cytotoxicity towards mammalian cells. This compound showed no cell growth inhibition at a concentration of 10 mg cm -3 and the cytotoxicity was lower than 1/14 000th of that of sodium arsenite and 1/1600th of that of sodium arsenate towards BALB/c 3T3 cells. The chromosomal aberrations caused by arsenobetaine at a concentration of 10 mg cm -3 consisted mainly of chromatid gaps and chromatid breaks, but in this concentration chromosomal breakage owing to its osmotic pressure is likely to be considerable. No SCE was observed at a concentration of 1 mg cm -3 . Arsenocholine and trimethylarsine oxide also showed no cell growth inhibited at a concentration of 10 mg cm -3 . However, tetramethylarsonium iodide inhibition the growth of BALBIc 3T3 at a concentration of 8 mg cm -3 . These compounds exhibited a low ability to induce chromosomal aberrations at a concentration range of 2-10 mg cm -3 and no SCE was observed at a concentration of 1.0 mg cm -3 . These results suggested that the major and minor organic arsenic compounds contained in marine fishery products are much less cytotoxic inorganic arsenic, methylarsonic acid and dimethylarsinic acid.

27 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
DNA damage
47K papers, 2.4M citations
84% related
DNA repair
41.5K papers, 2.4M citations
83% related
DNA
107.1K papers, 4.7M citations
77% related
Mutation
45.2K papers, 2.6M citations
76% related
Carcinogenesis
60.3K papers, 3.1M citations
75% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20238
202222
20215
202011
201914
201811