scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Social movement

About: Social movement is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 23103 publications have been published within this topic receiving 653076 citations. The topic is also known as: movement & syndical movement.


Papers
More filters
Book
20 Mar 2016
TL;DR: Learning from the Ground Up as mentioned in this paper is a collection of interviews with activists that explore the dynamics, politics, and richness of knowledge production within social movements and activist contexts, and highlight the significance of knowledge-production dimensions of movement activism.
Abstract: The dynamics, politics, and richness of knowledge production within social movements and activist contexts are often overlooked in scholarly literature, and sometimes even in the movements themselves. Given the academic emphasis on whether an action, campaign, or movement can be judged a “success,” the intellectual work that takes place in movements frequently goes unseen, as do the politics, processes, sites, and locations of knowledge production and learning in activist settings. Even social movement scholarship that draws upon or is embedded in movement actor perspectives has an expressed interest in “taking the measure of the new movements” (see Tom Mertes, 2004, p. xi, a collection of interviews with activists, originally published in New Left Review). The contributors to this collection, however, suggest that many powerful critiques and understandings of dominant ideologies and power structures, visions of social change, and the politics of domination and resistance in general emerge from these spaces and subsequently emphasize the significance of the knowledge-production dimensions of movement activism. Learning from the Ground Up also challenges ways in which grassroots and movement voices are often overwritten or otherwise marginalized in the context of purportedly “alternative” civil society networks and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The interdisciplinary approaches adopted by the authors in this volume are as rich as the varied movements, processes, and dynamics of knowledge production that these chapters explore and elucidate.

131 citations

Book
20 Jun 2004
TL;DR: In this paper, Lentin develops a comparative study of anti-racism in Britain, France, Italy, and Ireland, and provides insights not only into current debates on citizenship, immigration and Europeanisation, but also crucially assists us in understanding the nature of race, racism and racialisation themselves.
Abstract: ‘Remarkable ... a major contribution to our understanding and handling of one of the crucial contemporary issues that acquires more gravity by the day.’ Zygmunt Bauman This is an in-depth sociological study of the phenomenon of anti-racism, as both political discourse and social movement practice in western Europe. Lentin develops a comparative study of anti-racism in Britain, France, Italy and Ireland. While ‘race’ and racism have been submitted to many profound analyses, anti-racism has often been dealt with as either the mere opposite of racism or as a theme for prescriptives or polemics by those concerned with the persistence of racist discrimination. By contrast, this book views anti-racism as a variety of discourses that are central to the understanding of the politics of modern states. Examining anti-racism gives us insights not only into current debates on citizenship, immigration and Europeanisation, but it also crucially assists us in understanding the nature of race, racism and racialisation themselves. At a time of mounting state racism against asylum seekers, migrants and refugees throughout Europe and beyond, this book provides a much-needed exploration of the discourse of anti-racism that shapes policy and public opinion today.

131 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors explored the articulations and disarticulations between immigration and feminism, focusing particularly on the intersections of migration studies and feminist studies, and explored the intersection of migration and feminism.
Abstract: The second wave of U.S. feminism and the reconstitution of the United States as a country of immigration gained momentum in the 1970s. Recent manifestations of both feminism and immigration have left indelible changes on the social landscape, yet immigration and feminism are rarely coupled in popular discussion, social movements, or academic research. This article explores the articulations and disarticulations between immigration and feminism; it focuses particularly on the intersections of migration studies and feminist studies.

130 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the characteristics of the targets in the field and the social structural and cognitive boundaries between them determine SMO frames, which may explain findings where a frame fails to resonate with potential participants - the frame may not have been created with them in mind.
Abstract: As an explanatory method in studies of social movements, analyses of collective action frames have generally focused on the variable efficacy of the frames of social movement organizations (SMOs)in the mobilization of potential participants. However, this work has for practical reasons used the acknowledged analytic simplification that SMOs only target potential participants - and not opponents, elite decision makers, or the media - when constructing their frames. To incorporate multiple targets into future studies of SMO frame construction, this paper expands on the idea of a multi-organizational field. The author proposes that the characteristics of the targets in the field and the social structural and cognitive boundaries between them determine SMO frames. This perspective is demonstrated by analyzing changes in the collective action frames of SMOs in the religious pro-choice movement from 1967 to 1992. He argues that this perspective may explain findings where a frame fails to resonate with potential participants - the frame may not have been created with them in mind

130 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The proposed federal regulation of organic agriculture in the United States raises questions both about the nature and character of organic farming, as well as its relation to the agro-food system at large as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The proposed federal regulation oforganic agriculture in the United States raisesquestions both about the nature and character oforganic farming, as well as its relation to theagro-food system at large The regulatory process hasengendered a public debate about conventional andalternative approaches to agricultural production,which in turn raises issues of environmental politicsand society-nature relations An analysis oftranscripts from public hearings, organic farmingmovement literature, and interviews with organicpractitioners and advocates reveals the broaderecological, social, and political ramifications Inexamining the proposed federal rule and its criticalopposition, we encounter two different worldviews; twoconflicting visions of agriculture, rural life, andnature itself Whether this is a fundamental impasse,or a controversy that can be fruitfully resolved,remains an open question But organic farming hasarrived at a critical juncture, both fraught withperil, and full of opportunity The enormous publicresponse to this issue indicates the renewed potentialon the part of civil society to participate ingrassroots environmental social movements in supportof alternative agriculture

130 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Capitalism
27.7K papers, 858K citations
91% related
Politics
263.7K papers, 5.3M citations
90% related
Democracy
108.6K papers, 2.3M citations
90% related
Social change
61.1K papers, 1.7M citations
84% related
Globalization
81.8K papers, 1.7M citations
84% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20241
2023342
2022758
2021829
20201,073
20191,050