Topic
Social psychology (sociology)
About: Social psychology (sociology) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 18151 publications have been published within this topic receiving 907731 citations. The topic is also known as: Social psychology & sociological social psychology.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
01 Jan 2004
232 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, two major approaches to the study of social problems are examined: the functionalist statement by Merton, and the value-conflict view of Waller, and Fuller and Myers.
Abstract: Two major approaches to the study of social problems are examined: the functionalist statement by Merton, and the value-conflict view of Waller, and Fuller and Myers. The ambiguities of the relationship between the concepts “objective conditions” and “social problem” contained in the statements of these writers are identified and analyzed. Some preliminary suggestions are made to define the subject matter of the sociology of social problems as a specialized area of study.
230 citations
•
08 Jan 2007
TL;DR: In this paper, Baumeister and Bushman's book Social Psychology and Human Nature can help make sense of the always fascinating and sometimes bizarre and baffling diversity of human behavior and it's also just plain interesting to learn about how and why people act the way they do.
Abstract: You are a member of a social world on a planet containing about 7 billion people. This social world is filled with paradox, mystery, suspense, and outright absurdity. Explore how social psychology can help you make sense of your own social world with this engaging and accessible book. Roy F. Baumeister and Brad J. Bushman's SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND HUMAN NATURE can help you make sense of the always fascinating and sometimes bizarre and baffling diversity of human behavior-and it's also just plain interesting to learn about how and why people act the way they do.
230 citations
••
TL;DR: For instance, the authors argues that there is nothing inherent in the symbolic interactionism perspective that precludes the analysis of social organization and social structure, which is the central thrust of the perspective.
Abstract: Through communication processes, people transform themselves and their environments and then respond to those transformations (Stone & Farberman 1970:v). This paraphrase, for the most part, defines the central thrust of the perspective of symbolic interactionism. It easily subsumes those topics traditionally associated with the perspective, such as interaction processes, socialization, the establishment and maintenance of meaning, systematic symbolization, as well as social roles, identities, and the reflexive self, which are products of human association. For the purposes of this review, however, the important point is that it does not exclude or deny the existence of phenomena such as social class, bureaucracy, social institutions, power structures, international relations, or social stratification, which are usually included in considerations of social organization and social structure. Nor has the perspective ever completely ignored social structural considerations, although it is probably fair to say that symbolic interactionists have not devoted the attention to those matters that functionalists or conflict theorists have. It has been a relatively benign neglect, however, pertaining more to the selection of topics and research problems rather than to the explanatory power of the perspective itself. Even here, though, the perspective's critics have underemphasized symbolic interactionism's contributions to the analysis of social organization. In this review, I attempt to document some of those contributions, and argue that there is nothing inherent in the perspective that precludes the analysis of social organization and social structure. Since there is a considerable range in both theory and practice in symbolic interactionism (Petras & Meltzer 1973), I do not pretend to speak for all who adhere to the perspective. Rather, my objectives are limited to merely presenting evidence of a social organizational approach in symbolic interactionism that is much better developed than commonly believed by sociologists.
230 citations