scispace - formally typeset
Topic

Social responsibility

About: Social responsibility is a(n) research topic. Over the lifetime, 26369 publication(s) have been published within this topic receiving 626231 citation(s).

...read more

Papers
  More

Open accessJournal ArticleDOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.52.1.1
Albert Bandura1Institutions (1)
Abstract: The capacity to exercise control over the nature and quality of one's life is the essence of humanness. Human agency is characterized by a number of core features that operate through phenomenal and functional consciousness. These include the temporal extension of agency through intentionality and forethought, self-regulation by self-reactive influence, and self-reflectiveness about one's capabilities, quality of functioning, and the meaning and purpose of one's life pursuits. Personal agency operates within a broad network of sociostructural influences. In these agentic transactions, people are producers as well as products of social systems. Social cognitive theory distinguishes among three modes of agency: direct personal agency, proxy agency that relies on others to act on one's behest to secure desired outcomes, and collective agency exercised through socially coordinative and interdependent effort. Growing transnational embeddedness and interdependence are placing a premium on collective efficacy to exercise control over personal destinies and national life.

...read more

Topics: Agency (philosophy) (62%), Sense of agency (56%), Social responsibility (52%) ...read more

10,003 Citations


Book ChapterDOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
01 Jan 2007-
Abstract: When I hear businessmen speak eloquently about the “social responsibilities of business in a free-enterprise system”, I am reminded of the wonderful line about the Frenchman who discovered at the age of 70 that he had been speaking prose all his life. The businessmen believe that they are defending free enterprise when they declaim that business is not concerned “merely” with profit but also with promoting desirable “social” ends; that business has a “social conscience” and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers. In fact they are — or would be if they or anyone else took them seriously -preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades.

...read more

Topics: Social responsibility (53%)

9,256 Citations


Open accessJournal Article
Michael E. Porter1, Mark R. KramerInstitutions (1)
Abstract: Governments, activists, and the media have become adept at holding companies to account for the social consequences of their actions. In response, corporate social responsibility has emerged as an inescapable priority for business leaders in every country. Frequently, though, CSR efforts are counterproductive, for two reasons. First, they pit business against society, when in reality the two are interdependent. Second, they pressure companies to think of corporate social responsibility in generic ways instead of in the way most appropriate to their individual strategies. The fact is, the prevailing approaches to CSR are so disconnected from strategy as to obscure many great opportunities for companies to benefit society. What a terrible waste. If corporations were to analyze their opportunities for social responsibility using the same frameworks that guide their core business choices, they would discover, as Whole Foods Market, Toyota, and Volvo have done, that CSR can be much more than a cost, a constraint, or a charitable deed--it can be a potent source of innovation and competitive advantage. In this article, Michael Porter and Mark Kramer propose a fundamentally new way to look at the relationship between business and society that does not treat corporate growth and social welfare as a zero-sum game. They introduce a framework that individual companies can use to identify the social consequences of their actions; to discover opportunities to benefit society and themselves by strengthening the competitive context in which they operate; to determine which CSR initiatives they should address; and to find the most effective ways of doing so. Perceiving social responsibility as an opportunity rather than as damage control or a PR campaign requires dramatically different thinking--a mind-set, the authors warn, that will become increasingly important to competitive success.

...read more

7,002 Citations


Journal ArticleDOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Archie B. Carroll1Institutions (1)
01 Jul 1991-Business Horizons
Abstract: F or the better part of 30 years now, corporate executives have struggled with the issue of the firm's responsibility to its society. Early on it was argued by some that the corporation's sole responsibility was to provide a maximum financial return to shareholders. It became quickly apparent to everyone, however, that this pursuit of financial gain had to take place within the laws of the land. Though social activist groups and others throughout the 1960s advocated a broader notion of corporate responsibility, it was not until the significant social legislation of the early 1970s that this message became indelibly clear as a result of the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).

...read more

Topics: Social responsibility (62%), Corporate governance (59%), Corporate social responsibility (59%) ...read more

6,369 Citations


Journal ArticleDOI: 10.1177/0170840603024003910
Abstract: Most theorizing on the relationship between corporate social/environmental performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) assumes that the current evidence is too fractured or too variable to draw any generalizable conclusions. With this integrative, quantitative study, we intend to show that the mainstream claim that we have little generalizable knowledge about CSP and CFP is built on shaky grounds. Providing a methodologically more rigorous review than previous efforts, we conduct a meta-analysis of 52 studies (which represent the population of prior quantitative inquiry) yielding a total sample size of 33,878 observations. The meta-analytic findings suggest that corporate virtue in the form of social responsibility and, to a lesser extent, environmental responsibility is likely to pay off, although the operationalizations of CSP and CFP also moderate the positive association. For example, CSP appears to be more highly correlated with accounting-based measures of CFP than with market-based ...

...read more

Topics: Population (52%), Social responsibility (51%)

5,881 Citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202214
20211,163
20201,498
20191,435
20181,385
20171,537

Top Attributes

Show by:

Topic's top 5 most impactful authors

Samuel O. Idowu

22 papers, 392 citations

Matjaž Mulej

21 papers, 139 citations

Duygu Turker

16 papers, 710 citations

David Crowther

13 papers, 114 citations

Antonio Argandoña

11 papers, 493 citations

Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Public policy

76.7K papers, 1.6M citations

86% related
Organizational culture

31.5K papers, 926.7K citations

86% related
Restructuring

25.6K papers, 505.4K citations

86% related
Stakeholder

35.4K papers, 1M citations

86% related
Corporate governance

118.5K papers, 2.7M citations

86% related