scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Software portability

About: Software portability is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 8987 publications have been published within this topic receiving 164922 citations. The topic is also known as: portability.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Through the analysis and comparison of A-star algorithm and Dijkstra algorithm, path planning problem supporting multiple cars run parallely in a static and dynamic obstacles co-existing environment is studied.
Abstract: Path planning algorithm is a key issue among robot control areas. In practical engineering applications, traditional methods have some limitations to a certain degrees in key aspects of cost, efficiency, security, flexibility, portability, etc. Through the analysis and comparison of A-star algorithm and Dijkstra algorithm, path planning problem supporting multiple cars run parallely (PPSMC for short) in a static and dynamic obstacles co-existing environment is studied. An A-STAR-Dijkstra-integrated algorithm is promoted to make multiple cars moving parallely without collision or deadlock. Both two algorithms are optimized too. The algorithm has applied in smart park.

70 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2013
TL;DR: This paper proposes a kernel-adapter based design (OmniDB), a portable yet efficient query processor on parallel CPU/GPU architectures that attempts to develop an extensible query processing kernel (qKernel) based on an abstract model for parallel architectures, and to leverage an architecture-specific layer (adapter) to make qKernel be aware of the target architecture.
Abstract: Driven by the rapid hardware development of parallel CPU/GPU architectures, we have witnessed emerging relational query processing techniques and implementations on those parallel architectures. However, most of those implementations are not portable across different architectures, because they are usually developed from scratch and target at a specific architecture. This paper proposes a kernel-adapter based design (OmniDB), a portable yet efficient query processor on parallel CPU/GPU architectures. OmniDB attempts to develop an extensible query processing kernel (qKernel) based on an abstract model for parallel architectures, and to leverage an architecture-specific layer (adapter) to make qKernel be aware of the target architecture. The goal of OmniDB is to maximize the common functionality in qKernel so that the development and maintenance efforts for adapters are minimized across different architectures. In this demo, we demonstrate our initial efforts in implementing OmniDB, and present the preliminary results on the portability and efficiency.

69 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
29 Oct 2013
TL;DR: This relatively simple, priority based API, LAB, may serve as a blueprint for future API design in an increasingly complex design space that must tradeoff latency, accuracy, and efficiency to meet application needs and attain portability across evolving, sensor-rich, heterogeneous, and power constrained hardware.
Abstract: Emerging mobile applications that sense context are poised to delight and entertain us with timely news and events, health tracking, and social connections. Unfortunately, sensing algorithms quickly drain the phone's battery. Developers can overcome battery drain by carefully optimizing context sensing but that makes programming with context arduous and ties applications to current sensing hardware. These types of applications embody a twist on the classic tension between programmer productivity and performance due to their combination of requirements.This paper identifies the latency, accuracy, battery (LAB) abstraction to resolve this tension. We implement and evaluate LAB in a system called Senergy. Developers specify their LAB requirements independent of inference algorithms and sensors. Senergy delivers energy efficient context while meeting the requirements and adapts as hardware changes. We demonstrate LAB's expressiveness by using it to implement 22 context sensing algorithms for four types of context (location, driving, walking, and stationary) and six diverse applications. To demonstrate LAB's energy optimizations, we show often an order of magnitude improvements in energy efficiency on applications compared to prior approaches. This relatively simple, priority based API, may serve as a blueprint for future API design in an increasingly complex design space that must tradeoff latency, accuracy, and efficiency to meet application needs and attain portability across evolving, sensor-rich, heterogeneous, and power constrained hardware.

69 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
09 Jan 2010
TL;DR: Lazy Binary Splitting is presented, a user-level scheduler of nested parallelism for shared-memory multiprocessors that builds on existing Eager binary Splitting work-stealing, but improves performance and ease-of-programming.
Abstract: We present Lazy Binary Splitting (LBS), a user-level scheduler of nested parallelism for shared-memory multiprocessors that builds on existing Eager Binary Splitting work-stealing (EBS) implemented in Intel's Threading Building Blocks (TBB), but improves performance and ease-of-programming. In its simplest form (SP), EBS requires manual tuning by repeatedly running the application under carefully controlled conditions to determine a stop-splitting-threshold (sst)for every do-all loop in the code. This threshold limits the parallelism and prevents excessive overheads for fine-grain parallelism. Besides being tedious, this tuning also over-fits the code to some particular dataset, platform and calling context of the do-all loop, resulting in poor performance portability for the code. LBS overcomes both the performance portability and ease-of-programming pitfalls of a manually fixed threshold by adapting dynamically to run-time conditions without requiring tuning.We compare LBS to Auto-Partitioner (AP), the latest default scheduler of TBB, which does not require manual tuning either but lacks context portability, and outperform it by 38.9% using TBB's default AP configuration, and by 16.2% after we tuned AP to our experimental platform. We also compare LBS to SP by manually finding SP's sst using a training dataset and then running both on a different execution dataset. LBS outperforms SP by 19.5% on average. while allowing for improved performance portability without requiring tedious manual tuning. LBS also outperforms SP with sst=1, its default value when undefined, by 56.7%, and serializing work-stealing (SWS), another work-stealer by 54.7%. Finally, compared to serializing inner parallelism (SI) which has been used by OpenMP, LBS is 54.2% faster.

69 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2002
TL;DR: A comparative survey of the implementation issues of skeleton-based parallel programming techniques, according to a set of four criteria (efficiency, expressivity, portability, predictability), of these implementation techniques is made.
Abstract: This paper is a general overview of the SKIPPER project, run at Blaise Pascal University between 1996 and 2002. The main goal of the SKIPPER project was to demonstrate the applicability of skeleton-based parallel programming techniques to the fast prototyping of reactive vision applications. This proiect has produced several versions of a full-fledged integrated parallel programming environment (PPE). These PPEs have been used to implement realistic vision applications, such as road following or vehicle tracking for assisted driving, on embedded parallel platforms embarked on semi-autonomous vehicles. All versions of SKIPPER share a common front-end and repertoire of skeletons--presented in previous papers--but differ in the techniques used for implementing skeletons. This paper focuses on these implementation issues, by making a comparative survey, according to a set of four criteria (efficiency, expressivity, portability, predictability), of these implementation techniques. It also gives an account of the lessons we have learned, both when dealing with these implementation issues and when using the resulting tools for prototyping vision applications.

69 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Software
130.5K papers, 2M citations
90% related
Cloud computing
156.4K papers, 1.9M citations
83% related
The Internet
213.2K papers, 3.8M citations
83% related
Wireless sensor network
142K papers, 2.4M citations
82% related
Artificial neural network
207K papers, 4.5M citations
82% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20241
2023580
20221,257
2021290
2020308
2019381