scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Soil structure interaction

About: Soil structure interaction is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3653 publications have been published within this topic receiving 48890 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a displacement-based, reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column fiber model with distributed lateral deformable supports is presented to represent the salient features of the soil-pile interaction, including dragging force and gap formation along the pile-soil interfaces.

25 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of soil-structure interaction on the form of the control rule and on the effectiveness of active control of the seismic response of structures are examined, where the structure is modeled as a uniform shear beam supported on a rigid foundation embedded in an elastic soil.
Abstract: The effects of soil‐structure interaction on the form of the control rule and on the effectiveness of active control of the seismic response of structures are examined. The structure is modeled as a uniform shear beam supported on a rigid foundation embedded in an elastic soil. The seismic excitation is represented by vertically incident shear waves. Active control in the form of an absorbing boundary located at the top of the structure is considered. The active absorbing boundary cancels the reflection of waves at the top of the structure and eliminates resonance within the superstructure. It is found that the form of the control rule changes as a result of the rocking of the foundation associated with the kinematic and inertial interaction. However, the effectiveness of this form of active control remains unchanged or is improved when soil‐structure interaction effects are included.

25 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the seismic investigation components and methods, measurement of P- and S-wave velocities in the field and estimation of important dynamic parameters such as maximum shear modulus, modulus reduction curve, damping ratio, seismic site classification, predominant site period, liquefaction analysis through case studies for nuclear structures at Ka lpakkam and Kudankulam and power plant structures at New Delhi and Konaseema.
Abstract: Seismic site characterization is carried out for the co nstruction of nuclear structures and power plants in earthquake-prone areas to establish the occurrence of severe seismic hazards such as tectonic rupture, surface faulting, large scale liquefaction, sliding and seismic settlement which may alter the overall stability of the site. Seismic characterization is required to finalize the design earthquake parameters including choosing input seismic data. As a part of the investigation, mea surements of relevant dynamic parameters both in laboratory and in situ have been made for carrying out dynamic soil structure interaction analysis, for dete rmination of dynamic deformation, seismic settlement and dynamic response spectrum of the site, and for calculating dynamic earth pressure acting on retaining structures. We discuss here the seismic investigation components and methods, measurement of P- and S-wave velocities in the field and estimation of important dynamic parameters such as maximum shear modulus, modulus reduction curve, damping ratio, seismic site classific ation, predominant site period, liquefaction analysis through case studies for nuclear structures at Ka lpakkam and Kudankulam and power plant structures at New Delhi and Konaseema. GEOTECHNICAL site investigations in seismically active regions should include gathering of information about the physical nature of the site and its environment that will allow an adequate evaluation of seismic hazard. The scope of the investigation will be a matter of professional judgement, depending on the seismicity of the area and nature of the site as well as of the proposed or existing construction. In addition to the effects of local soil conditions upon the severity of ground motion, the investigation should cover possible earthquake danger from geological or other cons equential hazards such as fault displacement, subsidence, liquefaction, landslides, mudflows, etc. In this paper, var ious components and methods of seismic site characteri zation for nuclear structures and power plants are discussed through case studies: Prototype Fast Bre eder Reactor (PFBR) site and Spent Fuel Storage Facility (SFSF) site, Kalpakkam (TN); Atomic power project site, Kudankulam (TN); Pragati power project site, New Delhi; and combined cyclic power plant, Konaseema (AP). Investigation components and methods The major components of investigation specified here are particularly pertinent to the conceptual earthquake -resistant design of nuclear structures and power plants to be built in an earthquake zone.

25 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the effectiveness of energy dissipation in foundation soil (during rocking) with the effect of structural energy dissipation devices during seismic loading, and showed that if properly designed (with reliable capacity and tolerable settlements), adverse effects of foundation rocking can be minimized, while taking advantage of the favorable features of foundation-shallow foundations and hence they can be used as efficient and economical seismic energy disipation mechanisms in buildings and bridges.

25 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Buckling
30.3K papers, 465.8K citations
80% related
Constitutive equation
24.9K papers, 665.1K citations
78% related
Compressive strength
64.4K papers, 1M citations
77% related
Stiffness
26.2K papers, 424.4K citations
76% related
Landslide
24.6K papers, 472.1K citations
75% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202378
2022179
2021209
2020174
2019182
2018190