scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

State (polity)

About: State (polity) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 36954 publications have been published within this topic receiving 719822 citations. The topic is also known as: state (polity).


Papers
More filters
Book
01 Dec 1989
TL;DR: In this article, a cultural framework for studying state policy is proposed, where the subculture of state education policy makers and state policy mechanisms are considered as cultural products public values in the policy culture political culture and policy patterns among the states cultural values embedded in statutes.
Abstract: A cultural framework for studying state policy the subculture of state education policy makers state policy mechanisms as cultural products public values in the policy culture political culture and policy patterns among the states cultural values embedded in statutes understanding cultural influences on educational policy.

149 citations

MonographDOI
09 Sep 2004
TL;DR: The authors revisited the politics of international recognition and the quest for sovereignty in the 1990s, focusing on the case of Kosovo and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus under Turkey's Wings.
Abstract: 1. Introduction: The Quest for Sovereignty 2. Political Realities and Legal Anomalies: Revisiting the Politics of International Recognition 3. Can Clans Form Nations?: Somaliland in the Making 4. Bougainville: The Quest for Self-Determination 5. Sovereign Law vs Sovereign Nation: The Case of Kosovo 6. Montenegro and Serbia: Disassociation, Negotiation, Resolution? 7. Chechnya 8. From Frozen Conflict to Frozen Agreement: The Unrecognized State of Transnistria 9. Palestine 2003: The Perils of De Facto Statehood 10. The Abkhazians: A National Minority in their Own Homeland 11. Republika Srpska 12. The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus: Striving for International Acceptance under Turkey's Wings 13. Conclusion: States in Waiting, Nations Tired of Waiting

149 citations

Book
08 Feb 1989
TL;DR: Gelb as discussed by the authors provides a comparative analysis of women's movements in England, the United States, and Sweden from the 1960s to the present, focusing not only on the internal dynamics of the movements themselves, but also on the relationship of feminist politics to the political process as a whole and to the economic and ideological context.
Abstract: This incisive work provides a comparative political analysis of the women's movement in England, the United States, and Sweden from the 1960s to the present. Based on extensive interviews in each of the three countries, "Feminism and Politics" focuses not only on the internal dynamics of the movements themselves, but also on the relationship of feminist politics to the political process as a whole and to the economic and ideological context. Gelb finds that differences in the feminist movements in each country relate to systemic and cultural differences. In Britain the closed nature of the political system has greatly narrowed opportunities for feminist political activities. By contrast, the feminist movement in the United States has enjoyed relative autonomy and success, primarily because it has been unconstrained by the necessity of working through existing groups such as unions and political parties. In Sweden Gelb finds an anomalous situation in which the state has implemented many feminist policies but has allowed little ideological or political space for an autonomous movement. In its scope and analysis, "Feminism and Politics" offers a valuable new perspective on women's political activities.

148 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an ethnographic and theoretical exploration of shadow networks of goods, services, people and exchanges that flow outside formal and legal state channels and international laws is presented, and it is shown these are more formalized, integrated and rule-bound than traditional studies have suggested.
Abstract: This is an ethnographic and theoretical exploration of the `shadows': vast transnational networks of goods, services, people and exchanges that flow outside formal and legal state channels and international laws. These networks involve millions of people and more than a trillion dollars yearly worldwide, and my research demonstrates these are more formalized, integrated and rule-bound than traditional studies have suggested. Thus, `shadow' networks broker political, economic and social power that can rival many of the world's states, and they are profoundly implicated in world markets. This article explores core characteristics and cultures defining extant extra-state systems, and the power and potentialities for social sovereignty they wield. Investigation into shadow realities prompts a reassessment of the basic theoretical ideas concerning the nexus of legality/illegality, state/non-state and formal/non-formal power relations defining the world today.

148 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The Shadow State is a form of personal rule that is based on the decisions and interests of an individual, not a set of written laws and procedures, even though these formal aspects of government may exist as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: "... rulers have intervened in local economies in informal ways that diminish overall economic well-being and undermine the bureaucracies that are critical to sustaining economic growth." Africa attracts attention for its reputation for disorder. One in very 150 Africans is a refugee, the highest proportion of any continent.(1) Two major regional wars have affected the continent in the last decade: one centered on the Democratic Republic of Congo which involves ten countries, the other on an axis from southern Senegal to Liberia's borders, which involves five more. This disorder, coupled with weak government administration in many countries, offers opportunities for entrepreneurs to conceal illicit transactions and avoid regulations. Nigerians, for example, reportedly carry 40 percent of the heroin that reaches the United States.(2) Pirates appear off the coasts of Somalia and Sierra Leone and government soldiers are accused of attacking foreign ships.(3) The Angolan insurgency, UNITA (Unio Nacional para a Independencia Total do Angola), has reportedly earned as much as US$600 million annually from illicit sales of diamonds.(4) Liberia's president, popularly known as "Superglue" for his personal habit of keeping anything he touches, hosts various former South African intelligence operatives. Ukrainian arms merchants and American "missionaries" set up their own bank in Monrovia. These activities demonstrate the extent to which formally recognized governments can be involved in what officials in other countries consider illicit commerce. A central feature of regimes such as the one in Liberia is the extent to which its officials engage in what most outsiders--and most Liberians--consider to be clandestine commerce, which is a critically important way for these regimes to stay in power. As I will show below, this commerce accompanies armed conflict, and plays an important role in provoking and prolonging much of the warfare in Africa. In this article, I develop a model of clandestine economies as they operate in parts of contemporary Africa. The model will explain how clandestine economies contribute to the strengthening of political authority in seemingly chaotic parts of Africa. It shows how a range of activities that are commonly defined as corruption and evasion of government authority, or as consequences of incompetent administration and bad policies, actually grows out of the purposeful strategies of rulers. I will identify an archetypical Shadow State as one that is constructed behind the facade of laws and government institutions. The Shadow State is a form of personal rule; that is, an authority that is based upon the decisions and interests of an individual, not a set of written laws and procedures, even though these formal aspects of government may exist. The Shadow State is founded on rulers' abilities to manipulate external actors' access to markets, both formal and clandestine, in such a way as to enhance their power. This alternative manner of rule permits rulers to undermine the formal institutions of government itself. As I explain below, some rulers fear that these formal institutions may acquire interests and powers at odds with their efforts to retain power.(5) This article also addresses how this formally clandestine but dominant economy and system of political control is managed. In particular, Shadow State rulers recruit and arm youths to help intimidate opponents in economic markets and politics, and aspiring politicians recruit youths to attack their rivals. Free-lancing among these politicians, and among youths themselves, however, complicates Shadow State rulers' efforts to hold together their non-bureaucratic regimes. The next section will explore how Shadow State rulers address this internal dilemma. These rulers attempt to address the contradictions that beset the ensuing political structure by seeking out foreign partners. They use these foreign commercial partners, who often shun legal markets elsewhere, to partially replace their internal associates. …

148 citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202214
2021837
20201,140
20191,144
20181,239
20171,447