scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Strategic alliance

About: Strategic alliance is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2400 publications have been published within this topic receiving 72796 citations. The topic is also known as: strategic partnership.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce a social network perspective to the study of strategic alliances and identify five key issues for the formation of alliances, the choice of governance structure, the dynamic evolution of alliances and the performance of alliances.
Abstract: This paper introduces a social network perspective to the study of strategic alliances. It extends prior research, which has primarily considered alliances as dyadic exchanges and paid less attention to the fact that key precursors, processes, and outcomes associated with alliances can be defined and shaped in important ways by the social networks within which most firms are embedded. It identifies five key issues for the study of alliances: (1) the formation of alliances, (2) the choice of governance structure, (3) the dynamic evolution of alliances, (4) the performance of alliances, and (5) the performance consequences for firms entering alliances. For each of these issues, this paper outlines some of the current research and debates at the firm and dyad level and then discusses some of the new and important insights that result from introducing a network perspective. It highlights current network research on alliances and suggests an agenda for future research. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

4,694 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Arvind Parkhe1
TL;DR: In this paper, game theoretic structural dimensions and institutional responses to perceived opportunism in the study of voluntary interfirm cooperation are examined in 111 inter-irm alliances and found that some alliance structures are inherently more likely than others to be associated with high opportunity to cheat, high behavioral uncertainty, and poor stability, longevity and performance.
Abstract: Maintaining robust cooperation in interfirm strategic alliances poses special problems. Such relationships have received growing attention in recent research grounded in game theory, which has suggested that some alliance structures are inherently more likely than others to be associated with high opportunity to cheat, high behavioral uncertainty, and poor stability, longevity, and performance. The present study merged these theoretical insights with the logic of transaction cost economics in a general model of alliance structuring and tested it with data from 111 interfirm alliances. Findings generally supported the model and hypotheses, suggesting the need for a greater focus on game theoretic structural dimensions and institutional responses to perceived opportunism in the study of voluntary interfirm cooperation.

2,726 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors combine these alternative social and strategic explanations for alliance formation and find that alliances form when firms are in vulnerable strategic positions either because they are competing in emergent or highly competitive industries or because they attempting pioneering technical strategies.
Abstract: Why do firms form strategic alliances? The traditional theoretical answer has been transaction cost explanations. Yet, these explanations which center on transaction characteristics, static efficiency, and routine situations do not capture the strategic and social factors which propel many firms into alliance formation. In this study, however, we combine these alternative social and strategic explanations for alliance formation. Consistent with these explanations, we find that alliances form when firms are in vulnerable strategic positions either because they are competing in emergent or highly competitive industries or because they are attempting pioneering technical strategies. We also find that alliances form when firms are in strong social positions such that they are led by large, experienced, and well-connected top management teams. The underlying logic of alliance formation is, thus, strategic needs and social opportunities. We develop these findings by extending the resource-based view of the firm...

2,677 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate how the interorganizational networks of young companies affect their ability to acquire the resources necessary for survival and growth and propose that third parties rely on the prominence of the affiliates of those companies to make judgments about their quality and that young companies "endorsed by prominent exchange partners will perform better than otherwise comparable ventures that lack prominent associates.
Abstract: This paper investigates how the interorganizational networks of young companies affect their ability to acquire the resources necessary for survival and growth. We propose that, faced with great uncertainty about the quality of young companies, third parties rely on the prominence of the affiliates of those companies to make judgments about their quality and that young companies “endorsed” by prominent exchange partners will perform better than otherwise comparable ventures that lack prominent associates. Results of an empirical examination of the rate of initial public offering (IPO) and the market capitalization at IPO of the members of a large sample of venture-capital-backed biotechnology firms show that privately held biotech firms with prominent strategic alliance partners and organizational equity investors go to IPO faster and earn greater valuations at IPO than firms that lack such connections. We also empirically demonstrate that much of the benefit of having prominent affiliates stems from the ...

2,620 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a dynamic, firm-level study of the role of network resources in determining alliance formation and assesses the importance of firms' capabilities with alliance formation, and material resources as determinants of their alliance decisions.
Abstract: This paper presents a dynamic, firm-level study of the role of network resources in determining alliance formation. Such resources inhere not so much within the firm but reside in the interfirm networks in which firms are placed. Data from extensive fieldwork show that by influencing the extent to which firms have access to information about potential partners, such resources are an important catalyst for new alliances, especially because alliances entail considerable hazards. This study also assesses the importance of firms’ capabilities with alliance formation and material resources as determinants of their alliance decisions. I test this dynamic framework and its hypotheses about the role of time-varying network resources and firm capabilities with comprehensive longitudinal multi-industry data on the formation of strategic alliances by a panel of firms between 1970 and 1989. The results confirm field observations that accumulated network resources arising from firm participation in the network of accumulated prior alliances are influential in firms’ decisions to enter into new alliances. This study highlights the importance of network resources that firms derive from their embeddedness in networks for explaining their strategic behavior. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

2,541 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Competitive advantage
46.6K papers, 1.5M citations
80% related
Organizational learning
32.6K papers, 1.6M citations
77% related
Supply chain
84.1K papers, 1.7M citations
77% related
Organizational commitment
33K papers, 1.5M citations
77% related
Entrepreneurship
71.7K papers, 1.7M citations
76% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202312
202251
202162
202090
201988
201884