scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Subthreshold conduction

About: Subthreshold conduction is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 6343 publications have been published within this topic receiving 131957 citations. The topic is also known as: Subthreshold leakage.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a conformal mapping analysis of the potential distribution in the device body arising from the interelectrode capacitive coupling, combined with a self-consistent procedure to include the effects of the inversion charge is presented.
Abstract: A precise modeling framework for short-channel nanoscale double-gate (DG) and gate-all-around (GAA) MOSFETs is presented. For the DG MOSFET, the modeling is based on a conformal mapping analysis of the potential distribution in the device body arising from the interelectrode capacitive coupling, combined with a self-consistent procedure to include the effects of the inversion charge. The DG interelectrode coupling, which dominates the subthreshold behavior of the device, can also be applied with a high degree of precision to the cylindrical GAA MOSFET by performing a simple geometric scaling transformation to account for the difference in gate control in the two devices. Near threshold, self-consistent procedures invoking Poisson's equation in combination with boundary conditions and suitable modeling expressions for the potential are applied to the two devices. In strong inversion, these solutions converge to those of the respective long-channel devices. The drain current is calculated as part of the self-consistent treatment. The results for both the electrostatics and the current are in excellent agreement with numerical simulations.

53 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Integration and differentiation are shown to be implemented by the slow feedback mediated by oppositely directed subthreshold currents expressed in different neurons, which predicts that sensitivity to the rate of change of stimulus intensity differs qualitatively between integrators and differentiators.
Abstract: Neurons rely on action potentials, or spikes, to encode information. But spikes can encode different stimulus features in different neurons. We show here through simulations and experiments how neurons encode the integral or derivative of their input based on the distinct tuning properties conferred upon them by subthreshold currents. Slow-activating subthreshold inward (depolarizing) current mediates positive feedback control of subthreshold voltage, sustaining depolarization and allowing the neuron to spike on the basis of its integrated stimulus waveform. Slow-activating subthreshold outward (hyperpolarizing) current mediates negative feedback control of subthreshold voltage, truncating depolarization and forcing the neuron to spike on the basis of its differentiated stimulus waveform. Depending on its direction, slow-activating subthreshold current cooperates or competes with fast-activating inward current during spike initiation. This explanation predicts that sensitivity to the rate of change of stimulus intensity differs qualitatively between integrators and differentiators. This was confirmed experimentally in spinal sensory neurons that naturally behave as specialized integrators or differentiators. Predicted sensitivity to different stimulus features was confirmed by covariance analysis. Integration and differentiation, which are themselves inverse operations, are thus shown to be implemented by the slow feedback mediated by oppositely directed subthreshold currents expressed in different neurons.

53 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The history of technology scaling that follows Moore's law from the prespective of microprocessor designs is reviewed and a model that predicts system leakage based on first principles will be presented and circuit techniques to reduce system leakage will be discussed.
Abstract: The driving force for the semiconductor industry growth has been the elegant scaling nature of CMOS technology. In this article, we will first review the history of technology scaling that follows Moore's law from the prespective of microprocessor designs. Challenges to continue the historical scaling trends will be highlighted and design choices to address two specific challenges, process variation and leakage power, will be discussed. In nanoscale CMOS technology generations, supply and threshold voltages will have to continually scale to sustain performance increase, limit energy consumption, control power dissipation, and maintain reliability. These continual scaling requirements on supply and threshold voltages pose several technology and circuit design challenges. One such challenge is the expected increase in process variation and the resulting increase in design margins. Concept of adaptive circuit schemes to deal with increasing design margins will be explained. Next, with threshold voltage scaling, subthreshold leakage power has become a significant portion of total power in nanoscale CMOS systems. Therefore, it has become imperative to accurately predict and minimize leakage power of such systems, especially with increasing within-die threshold voltage variation. A model that predicts system leakage based on first principles will be presented and circuit techniques to reduce system leakage will be discussed. It is essential to point out that this article does not cover all challenges that nanoscale CMOS systems face. Challenges that are not detailed in the main sections of the article and speculation on what future nanoscale silicon based CMOS systems might resemble are summarized.

53 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2017
TL;DR: A 0.5V 0.0023mm2 recursive all-digital LDO (RLDO) in 65nm with hybrid PD-SAR and PWM duty control that achieves 15.1ns and 100ns response and settling times, respectively, while maintaining 5.6mV/mA load regulation and loop stability across a 20,000× dynamic load range, eclipsing state-of-the-art active area, response time, settling time, and dynamic range metrics.
Abstract: Modern subthreshold SoC designs feature multiple power domains to dynamically track the maximum energy-efficiency point (0.32–0.45V [1]) in response to application demands. While analog low-drop-out (LDO) regulators have shown rapid response times (e.g. T R = 0.65ns [2]) and excellent steady-state performance, they fail to operate at the low input voltages, V IN , typically supplied to such SoCs via either a high-efficiency switching DC-DC converter or an external harvesting source (e.g., V IN = 0.5V). On the other hand, digital LDOs (DLDOs) are becoming popular in low-voltage SoC designs where they can operate reliably from supplies down to 0.5V. However, conventional DLDOs respond slowly to large current steps, especially at low voltages (e.g., T R = ∼44ns, 57.1ns, and 4µs at V IN =1V [3–5], and 20µs at V IN =0.5V [1]). Furthermore, they suffer from limited dynamic range over which the load is regulated and stable (e.g. s , this comes at increased power consumption and, importantly, reduced loop stability. To address these issues, this paper presents a 0.5V 0.0023mm2 recursive all-digital LDO (RLDO) in 65nm with hybrid PD-SAR and PWM duty control that achieves 15.1ns and 100ns response and settling times, respectively, while maintaining 5.6mV/mA load regulation and loop stability across a 20,000× dynamic load range, eclipsing state-of-the-art active area, response time, settling time, and dynamic range metrics across prior-art digital LDOs by over an order of magnitude.

53 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
CMOS
81.3K papers, 1.1M citations
78% related
Transistor
138K papers, 1.4M citations
77% related
Integrated circuit
82.7K papers, 1M citations
75% related
Amplifier
163.9K papers, 1.3M citations
74% related
Field-effect transistor
56.7K papers, 1M citations
73% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023153
2022349
2021172
2020196
2019242
2018272