scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Supreme court

About: Supreme court is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 41858 publications have been published within this topic receiving 306787 citations. The topic is also known as: court of last resort & highest court of appeal.


Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1962
TL;DR: In this article, the power of the Supreme Court and its relationship with other political institutions is examined, and specific cases which illustrate the relationship between the court and other institutions are discussed.
Abstract: Examines the power of the Supreme Court and cites specific cases which illustrate its relationship with other political institutions

697 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using content analytic techniques, this paper derived independent and reliable measures of the values of all Supreme Court justices from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy, providing strong support for the attitudinal model.
Abstract: It is commonly assumed that Supreme Court justices' votes largely reflect their attitudes, values, or personal policy preferences. Nevertheless, this assumption has never been adequately tested with independent measures of the ideological values of justices, that is, measures not taken from their votes on the Court. Using content analytic techniques, we derive independent and reliable measures of the values of all Supreme Court justices from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy. These values correlate highly with the votes of the justices, providing strong support for the attitudinal model.

633 citations

Book
15 Nov 1987
TL;DR: The Federal Government in the United States is a government "of the people, by the people and for the people" as mentioned in this paper, and it is composed of three branches of government: the Presidency, the Senate, and the House of Representatives.
Abstract: The Federal Government in the United States is a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people." Presidents are elected by popular vote in the nation (filtered through the electoral college), Senators are elected by popular vote in their states, and Representatives are elected by popular vote in their Congressional districts. Cabinet members and agency heads are appointed by the elected president, as are members of the Supreme Court. But this says nothing about politics. Professor Lauman and Knoke have asked, in this book, how policies were made, in the period 1977-1980, in the areas of energy and health. The question is a very different one from the question of how the positions of president and Congress are filled.

632 citations

Gary Orfield1
01 Jul 2001
TL;DR: Orfield et al. as mentioned in this paper found that segregation continued to intensify throughout the 1990s, a period in which there were three major Supreme Court decisions authorizing a return to segregated neighborhood schools and limiting the reach and duration of desegregation orders.
Abstract: Author(s): Orfield, Gary | Abstract: Almost a half century after the US Supreme Court concluded that Southern school segregation was unconstitutional and "inherently unequal," new statistics from the 1998-99 school year show that segregation continued to intensify throughout the 1990s, a period in which there were three major Supreme Court decisions authorizing a return to segregated neighborhood schools and limiting the reach and duration of desegregation orders The data from the 2000 Census and from national school statistics show that the US is an overwhelmingly metropolitan society, dominated by its suburbs The high level of suburban segregation reported for African American and Latino students in this report suggests that a major set of challenges to the future of the minority middle class and to the integration of suburbia need to be addressed

511 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper examined theories of diffuse support and institutional legitimacy by testing hypotheses about the interrelationships among the salience of courts, satisfaction with court outputs, and diffuse support for national high courts.
Abstract: The purpose of this research is to examine theories of diffuse support and institutional legitimacy by testing hypotheses about the interrelationships among the salience of courts, satisfaction with court outputs, and diffuse support for national high courts. Like our predecessors, we are constrained by essentially cross-sectional data; unlike them, we analyze mass attitudes toward high courts in eighteen countries. Because our sample includes many countries with newly formed high courts, our cross-sectional data support several longitudinal inferences, using the age of the judicial institution as an independent variable. We discover that the U.S. Supreme Court is not unique in the esteem in which it is held and, like other courts, it profits from a tendency of people to credit it for pleasing decisions but not to penalize it for displeasing ones. Generally, older courts more successfully link specific and diffuse support, most likely due to satisfying successive, nonoverlapping constituencies.

501 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Human rights
98.9K papers, 1.1M citations
81% related
International law
52K papers, 556.6K citations
80% related
Politics
263.7K papers, 5.3M citations
79% related
Racism
28.4K papers, 735.2K citations
79% related
Criminal justice
27K papers, 415.6K citations
78% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20231,077
20222,410
2021599
20201,063
20191,149
20181,225