scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Temporal logic

About: Temporal logic is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 7637 publications have been published within this topic receiving 262046 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: An interval-based temporal logic is introduced, together with a computationally effective reasoning algorithm based on constraint propagation, which is notable in offering a delicate balance between space and time.
Abstract: An interval-based temporal logic is introduced, together with a computationally effective reasoning algorithm based on constraint propagation. This system is notable in offering a delicate balance between

7,466 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an interval-based temporal logic is introduced, together with a computationally effective reasoning algorithm based on constraint propagation, which is notable in offering a delicate balance between time and space.
Abstract: An interval-based temporal logic is introduced, together with a computationally effective reasoning algorithm based on constraint propagation. This system is notable in offering a delicate balance between

7,362 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
30 Sep 1977
TL;DR: A unified approach to program verification is suggested, which applies to both sequential and parallel programs, and the main proof method is that of temporal reasoning in which the time dependence of events is the basic concept.
Abstract: A unified approach to program verification is suggested, which applies to both sequential and parallel programs. The main proof method suggested is that of temporal reasoning in which the time dependence of events is the basic concept. Two formal systems are presented for providing a basis for temporal reasoning. One forms a formalization of the method of intermittent assertions, while the other is an adaptation of the tense logic system Kb, and is particularly suitable for reasoning about concurrent programs.

5,174 citations

Book ChapterDOI
29 Mar 2004
TL;DR: This work introduces a temporal logic of calls and returns (CaRet) for specification and algorithmic verification of correctness requirements of structured programs and presents a tableau construction that reduces the model checking problem to the emptiness problem for a Buchi pushdown system.
Abstract: Model checking of linear temporal logic (LTL) specifications with respect to pushdown systems has been shown to be a useful tool for analysis of programs with potentially recursive procedures. LTL, however, can specify only regular properties, and properties such as correctness of procedures with respect to pre and post conditions, that require matching of calls and returns, are not regular. We introduce a temporal logic of calls and returns (CaRet) for specification and algorithmic verification of correctness requirements of structured programs. The formulas of CaRet are interpreted over sequences of propositional valuations tagged with special symbols call and ret. Besides the standard global temporal modalities, CaRet admits the abstract-next operator that allows a path to jump from a call to the matching return. This operator can be used to specify a variety of non-regular properties such as partial and total correctness of program blocks with respect to pre and post conditions. The abstract versions of the other temporal modalities can be used to specify regular properties of local paths within a procedure that skip over calls to other procedures. CaRet also admits the caller modality that jumps to the most recent pending call, and such caller modalities allow specification of a variety of security properties that involve inspection of the call-stack. Even though verifying context-free properties of pushdown systems is undecidable, we show that model checking CaRet formulas against a pushdown model is decidable. We present a tableau construction that reduces our model checking problem to the emptiness problem for a Buchi pushdown system. The complexity of model checking CaRet formulas is the same as that of checking LTL formulas, namely, polynomial in the model and singly exponential in the size of the specification.

3,516 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Model checking
16.9K papers, 451.6K citations
93% related
Component-based software engineering
24.2K papers, 461.9K citations
85% related
Distributed algorithm
20.4K papers, 548.1K citations
85% related
Data structure
28.1K papers, 608.6K citations
85% related
Time complexity
36K papers, 879.5K citations
84% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202380
2022233
2021219
2020260
2019270
2018267