scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Transcription Factor CHOP

About: Transcription Factor CHOP is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 443 publications have been published within this topic receiving 46408 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the translocation t(12;16)(q13:p11) in malignant myxoid liposarcoma can be a fusion of the CHOP dominant negative transcription factor gene with a novel gene, FUS, which can result in fusion of.
Abstract: The search for tumour–specific markers is one of the chief goals in cancer biology. We show that the translocation t(12;16)(q13:p11) in malignant myxoid liposarcoma can be a fusion of the CHOP dominant negative transcription factor gene with a novel gene, FUS, which can result in fusion of the FUS glycine–rich protein with the whole CHOP coding region. The data support the concept that protein fusion may commonly occur in solid tumours resulting in tumour–specific markers of potential clinical importance. The data also indicate the importance of transcription disruption in the pathogenesis of solid tumours.

542 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: CHOP turns on ERO1-α to release calcium via IP3R and trigger cell death in response to ER stress.
Abstract: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress–induced apoptosis is involved in many diseases, but the mechanisms linking ER stress to apoptosis are incompletely understood. Based on roles for C/EPB homologous protein (CHOP) and ER calcium release in apoptosis, we hypothesized that apoptosis involves the activation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) receptor (IP3R) via CHOP-induced ERO1-α (ER oxidase 1 α). In ER-stressed cells, ERO1-α is induced by CHOP, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of ERO1-α suppresses apoptosis. IP3-induced calcium release (IICR) is increased during ER stress, and this response is blocked by siRNA-mediated silencing of ERO1-α or IP3R1 and by loss-of-function mutations in Ero1a or Chop. Reconstitution of ERO1-α in Chop−/− macrophages restores ER stress–induced IICR and apoptosis. In vivo, macrophages from wild-type mice but not Chop−/− mice have elevated IICR when the animals are challenged with the ER stressor tunicamycin. Macrophages from insulin-resistant ob/ob mice, another model of ER stress, also have elevated IICR. These data shed new light on how the CHOP pathway of apoptosis triggers calcium-dependent apoptosis through an ERO1-α–IP3R pathway.

498 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that numerous members of the ATF/CREB family are involved in the cellular stress response, and that regulation of stress-induced biphasic Gadd153 expression in PC12 cells involves the ordered, sequential binding of multiple transcription factor complexes to the C/EBP-ATF composite site.
Abstract: Gadd153, also known as chop, encodes a member of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) transcription factor family and is transcriptionally activated by cellular stress signals. We recently demonstrated that arsenite treatment of rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells results in the biphasic induction of Gadd153 mRNA expression, controlled in part through binding of C/EBPbeta and two uncharacterized protein complexes to the C/EBP-ATF (activating transcription factor) composite site in the Gadd153 promoter. In this report, we identified components of these additional complexes as two ATF/CREB (cAMP-responsive-element-binding protein) transcription factors having differential binding activities dependent upon the time of arsenite exposure. During arsenite treatment of PC12 cells, we observed enhanced binding of ATF4 to the C/EBP-ATF site at 2 h as Gadd153 mRNA levels increased, and enhanced binding of ATF3 complexes at 6 h as Gadd153 expression declined. We further demonstrated that ATF4 activates, while ATF3 represses, Gadd153 promoter activity through the C/EBP-ATF site. ATF3 also repressed ATF4-mediated transactivation and arsenite-induced activation of the Gadd153 promoter. Our results suggest that numerous members of the ATF/CREB family are involved in the cellular stress response, and that regulation of stress-induced biphasic Gadd153 expression in PC12 cells involves the ordered, sequential binding of multiple transcription factor complexes to the C/EBP-ATF composite site.

460 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that the stress of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) activates P58IPK gene transcription through an ER stress-response element in its promoter region and plays a functional role in the expression of downstream markers of PERK activity in the later phase of the ER-stress response.
Abstract: P58IPK is an Hsp40 family member known to inhibit the interferon (IFN)-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated, eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) protein kinase R (PKR) by binding to its kinase domain. We find that the stress of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) activates P58IPK gene transcription through an ER stress-response element in its promoter region. P58IPK interacts with and inhibits the PKR-like ER-localized eIF2α kinase PERK, which is normally activated during the ER-stress response to protect cells from ER stress by attenuating protein synthesis and reducing ER client protein load. Levels of phosphorylated eIF2α were lower in ER-stressed P58IPK-overexpressing cells and were enhanced in P58IPK mutant cells. In the ER-stress response, PKR-like ER kinase (PERK)-mediated translational repression is transient and is followed by translational recovery and enhanced expression of genes that increase the capacity of the ER to process client proteins. The absence of P58IPK resulted in increased expression levels of two ER stress-inducible genes, BiP and Chop, consistent with the enhanced eIF2α phosphorylation in the P58IPK deletion cells. Our studies suggest that P58IPK induction during the ER-stress response represses PERK activity and plays a functional role in the expression of downstream markers of PERK activity in the later phase of the ER-stress response.

387 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2007-Diabetes
TL;DR: ER stress is a mechanism by which IAPP induces β-cell apoptosis and is characteristic of β-cells in humans with type 2 diabetes but not type 1 diabetes, consistent with a role of protein misfolding in β- cell apoptosis in type 2abetes.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE —Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress–induced apoptosis may be a common cause of cell attrition in diseases characterized by misfolding and oligomerisation of amyloidogenic proteins. The islet in type 2 diabetes is characterized by islet amyloid derived from islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) and increased β-cell apoptosis. We questioned the following: 1 ) whether IAPP-induced β-cell apoptosis is mediated by ER stress and 2 ) whether β-cells in type 2 diabetes are characterized by ER stress. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —The mechanism of IAPP-induced apoptosis was investigated in INS-1 cells and human IAPP (HIP) transgenic rats. ER stress in humans was investigated by β-cell C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) expression in 7 lean nondiabetic, 12 obese nondiabetic, and 14 obese type 2 diabetic human pancreata obtained at autopsy. To assure specificity for type 2 diabetes, we also examined pancreata from eight cases of type 1 diabetes. RESULTS —IAPP induces β-cell apoptosis by ER stress in INS-1 cells and HIP rats. Perinuclear CHOP was rare in lean nondiabetic (2.6 ± 2.0%) and more frequent in obese nondiabetic (14.6 ± 3.0%) and obese diabetic (18.5 ± 3.6%) pancreata. Nuclear CHOP was not detected in lean nondiabetic and rare in obese nondiabetic (0.08 ± 0.04%) but six times higher ( P < 0.01) in obese diabetic (0.49 ± 0.17%) pancreata. In type 1 diabetic pancreata, perinuclear CHOP was rare (2.5 ± 2.3%) and nuclear CHOP not detected. CONCLUSIONS —ER stress is a mechanism by which IAPP induces β-cell apoptosis and is characteristic of β-cells in humans with type 2 diabetes but not type 1 diabetes. These findings are consistent with a role of protein misfolding in β-cell apoptosis in type 2 diabetes.

384 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Signal transduction
122.6K papers, 8.2M citations
86% related
Transcription factor
82.8K papers, 5.4M citations
85% related
Protein kinase A
68.4K papers, 3.9M citations
85% related
Regulation of gene expression
85.4K papers, 5.8M citations
85% related
Cellular differentiation
90.9K papers, 6M citations
84% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
20213
20203
20193
201811
201719
201648