scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Tree-adjoining grammar

About: Tree-adjoining grammar is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2491 publications have been published within this topic receiving 57813 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper describes an efficient procedure to compute the relative entropy between two stochastic deterministic regular tree grammars.

17 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
30 Mar 2009
TL;DR: This work presents several algorithms for assigning heads in phrase structure trees, based on different linguistic intuitions on the role of heads in natural language syntax, and evaluates algorithms based on the match with gold standard head-annotations, and the comparative parsing accuracy of the lexicalized grammars they give rise to.
Abstract: We present several algorithms for assigning heads in phrase structure trees, based on different linguistic intuitions on the role of heads in natural language syntax. Starting point of our approach is the observation that a head-annotated treebank defines a unique lexicalized tree substitution grammar. This allows us to go back and forth between the two representations, and define objective functions for the unsupervised learning of head assignments in terms of features of the implicit lexicalized tree grammars. We evaluate algorithms based on the match with gold standard head-annotations, and the comparative parsing accuracy of the lexicalized grammars they give rise to. On the first task, we approach the accuracy of hand-designed heuristics for English and inter-annotation-standard agreement for German. On the second task, the implied lexicalized grammars score 4% points higher on parsing accuracy than lexicalized grammars derived by commonly used heuristics.

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It has been pointed out that context-free grammars of a certain class have the property that a one-one mapping exists between the structural descriptions of its sentences and the sentences generated by a finite state grammar.
Abstract: It has been pointed out that context-free grammars of a certain class have the property that a one-one mapping exists between the structural descriptions of its sentences and the sentences generated by a finite state grammar. Given a grammar, it is decidable whether it belongs to this specific class or not. The grammars of this class can be divided into a countable hierarchy of increasing complexity.

17 citations

Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: It is proved that history preserving bisimulation is decidable for finite-state graph grammars, by showing how the problem can be reduced to deciding the equivalence of finite causal automata.
Abstract: Along the years the concurrent behaviour of graph grammars has been widely investigated, and, in particular, several classical approaches to the semantics of Petri nets have been extended to graph grammars. Most of the existing semantics for graph grammars provide a (possibly concurrent) operational model of computation, while little interest has been devoted to the definition of abstract observational semantics. The aim of this paper is to introduce and study a behavioural equivalence over graph grammars, inspired by the classical history preserving bisimulation. Several choices are conceivable according to the kind of concurrent observation one is interested in. We concentrate on the basic case where the concurrent nature of a graph grammar computation is described by means of a prime event structure. As it happens for Petri nets, history preserving bisimulation can be studied in the general framework of causal automata -- a variation of ordinary automata introduced to deal with history dependent formalisms. In particular, we prove that history preserving bisimulation is decidable for finite-state graph grammars, by showing how the problem can be reduced to deciding the equivalence of finite causal automata.

16 citations

Book ChapterDOI
04 Jun 1991
TL;DR: The nature and rationale of Affix Grammars and their application in describing programming languages are concerned and some parsing and affix evaluation methods for deterministic and nondeterministic Affix grammars are discussed.
Abstract: Affix Grammars are members of the family of Two-Level Grammars, along with W-grammars, Metamorphosis Grammars and Attribute Grammars. In this tutorial we shall be concerned with the nature and rationale of Affix Grammars and their application in describing programming languages. Some parsing and affix evaluation methods for deterministic and nondeterministic Affix Grammars are discussed. By means of an example, a comparison is made with W-grammars and Attribute Grammars.

16 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Graph (abstract data type)
69.9K papers, 1.2M citations
85% related
Parsing
21.5K papers, 545.4K citations
85% related
Time complexity
36K papers, 879.5K citations
84% related
Semantics
24.9K papers, 653K citations
82% related
Tree (data structure)
44.9K papers, 749.6K citations
81% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202315
202225
20217
20205
20196
201811