Undecidable problem

About: Undecidable problem is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3135 publications have been published within this topic receiving 71238 citations.

Almost optimal strategies in one clock priced timed games

Abstract: We consider timed games extended with cost information, and prove computability of the optimal cost and of e-optimal memoryless strategies in timed games with one clock. In contrast, this problem has recently been proved undecidable for timed games with three clocks.

Language-Theoretic abstraction refinement

Abstract: We give a language-theoretic counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) algorithm for the safety verification of recursive multi-threaded programs. First, we reduce safety verification to the (undecidable) language emptiness problem for the intersection of context-free languages. Initially, our CEGAR procedure overapproximates the intersection by a context-free language. If the overapproximation is empty, we declare the system safe. Otherwise, we compute a bounded language from the overapproximation and check emptiness for the intersection of the context free languages and the bounded language (which is decidable). If the intersection is non-empty, we report a bug. If empty, we refine the overapproximation by removing the bounded language and try again. The key idea of the CEGAR loop is the language-theoretic view: different strategies to get regular overapproximations and bounded approximations of the intersection give different implementations. We give concrete algorithms to approximate context-free languages using regular languages and to generate bounded languages representing a family of counterexamples. We have implemented our algorithms and provide an experimental comparison on various choices for the regular overapproximation and the bounded underapproximation.

Undecidability of domino games and hhp-bisimilarity

Abstract: History preserving bisimilarity (hp-bisimilarity) and hereditary history preserving bisimilarity (hhp-bisimilarity) are behavioural equivalences taking into account causal relationships between events of concurrent systems. Their prominent feature is that they are preserved under action refinement, an operation important for the top-down design of concurrent systems. It is shown that, in contrast to hp-bisimilarity, checking hhp-bisimilarity for finite labelled asynchronous transition systems is undecidable, by a reduction from the halting problem of 2-counter machines. To make the proof more transparent a novel intermediate problem of checking domino bisimilarity for origin constrained tiling systems is introduced and shown undecidable. It is also shown that the unlabelled domino bisimilarity problem is undecidable, which implies undecidability of hhp-bisimilarity for unlabelled finite asynchronous systems. Moreover, it is argued that the undecidability of hhp-bisimilarity holds for finite elementary net systems and 1-safe Petri nets.

Learning to prove safety over parameterised concurrent systems

Abstract: We revisit the classic problem of proving safety over parameterised concurrent systems, i.e., an infinite family of finite-state concurrent systems that are represented by some finite (symbolic) means. An example of such an infinite family is a dining philosopher protocol with any number n of processes (n being the parameter that defines the infinite family). Regular model checking is a well-known generic framework for modelling parameterised concurrent systems, where an infinite set of configurations (resp. transitions) is represented by a regular set (resp. regular transducer). Although verifying safety properties in the regular model checking framework is undecidable in general, many sophisticated semi-algorithms have been developed in the past fifteen years that can successfully prove safety in many practical instances. In this paper, we propose a simple solution to synthesise regular inductive invariants that makes use of Angluin's classic L∗ algorithm (and its variants). We provide a termination guarantee when the set of configurations reachable from a given set of initial configurations is regular. We have tested L∗ algorithm on standard (as well as new) examples in regular model checking including the dining philosopher protocol, the dining cryptographer protocol, and several mutual exclusion protocols (e.g. Bakery, Burns, Szymanski, and German). Our experiments show that, despite the simplicity of our solution, it can perform at least as well as existing semi-algorithms.