scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Undecidable problem

About: Undecidable problem is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 3135 publications have been published within this topic receiving 71238 citations.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
09 Jul 2018
TL;DR: This paper studies the rational synthesis problem for turn-based multiplayer non zero-sum games played on finite graphs for omega-regular objectives and shows that this problem is ExpTime-C for parity objectives in the two-player case (even if both players are imperfectly informed) and undecidable for more than 2 players.
Abstract: In this paper, we study the rational synthesis problem for turn-based multiplayer non zero-sum games played on finite graphs for omega-regular objectives. Rationality is formalized by the concept of Nash equilibrium (NE). Contrary to previous works, we consider here the more general and more practically relevant case where players are imperfectly informed. In sharp contrast with the perfect information case, NE are not guaranteed to exist in this more general setting. This motivates the study of the NE existence problem. We show that this problem is ExpTime-C for parity objectives in the two-player case (even if both players are imperfectly informed) and undecidable for more than 2 players. We then study the rational synthesis problem and show that the problem is also ExpTime-C for two imperfectly informed players and undecidable for more than 3 players. As the rational synthesis problem considers a system (Player 0) playing against a rational environment (composed of k players), we also consider the natural case where only Player 0 is imperfectly informed about the state of the environment (and the environment is considered as perfectly informed). In this case, we show that the ExpTime-C result holds when k is arbitrary but fixed. We also analyse the complexity when k is part of the input.

19 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proved that the torsion problem for elements of the Brin-Thompson group 2V is undecidable, and it is shown that there does not exist an algorithm to determine whether an element of the rational group R of Grigorchuk, Nekrashevich, and Sushchanskii has finite order.
Abstract: Using a result of Kari and Ollinger, we prove that the torsion problem for elements of the Brin-Thompson group 2V is undecidable. As a result, we show that there does not exist an algorithm to determine whether an element of the rational group R of Grigorchuk, Nekrashevich, and Sushchanskii has finite order. A modification of the construction gives other undecidability results about the dynamics of the action of elements of 2V on Cantor Space. Arzhantseva, Lafont, and Minasyanin prove in 2012 that there exists a finitely presented group with solvable word problem and unsolvable torsion problem. To our knowledge, 2V furnishes the first concrete example of such a group, and gives an example of a direct undecidability result in the extended family of R. Thompson type groups.

19 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the problem of learning a non-deterministic probabilistic system consistent with a given finite set of positive and negative tree samples is considered, where consistency is defined with respect to strong simulation conformance.
Abstract: We consider the problem of learning a non-deterministic probabilistic system consistent with a given finite set of positive and negative tree samples. Consistency is defined with respect to strong simulation conformance. We propose learning algorithms that use traditional and a new "stochastic" state-space partitioning, the latter resulting in the minimum number of states. We then use them to solve the problem of "active learning", that uses a knowledgeable teacher to generate samples as counterexamples to simulation equivalence queries. We show that the problem is undecidable in general, but that it becomes decidable under a suitable condition on the teacher which comes naturally from the way samples are generated from failed simulation checks. The latter problem is shown to be undecidable if we impose an additional condition on the learner to always conjecture a "minimum state" hypothesis. We therefore propose a semi-algorithm using stochastic partitions. Finally, we apply the proposed (semi-) algorithms to infer intermediate assumptions in an automated assume-guarantee verification framework for probabilistic systems.

19 citations

Book ChapterDOI
Artur Jeż1
08 Jul 2014
TL;DR: It is shown that context unification is in PSPACE, so as word equations, and NP is still the best known lower-bound.
Abstract: Contexts are terms with one ‘hole’, i.e. a place in which we can substitute an argument. In context unification we are given an equation over terms with variables representing contexts and ask about the satisfiability of this equation. Context unification at the same time is subsumed by a second-order unification, which is undecidable, and subsumes satisfiability of word equations, which is in PSPACE. We show that context unification is in PSPACE, so as word equations. For both problems NP is still the best known lower-bound.

19 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown, assuming the linear case of Schinzel's Hypothesis, that the first-order theory of the structure 〈ω; +, P 〉, where P is the set of primes, is undecidable and, in fact, that multiplication of natural numbers is first- order definable in this structure.
Abstract: It is shown, assuming the linear case of Schinzel's Hypothesis, that the first-order theory of the structure 〈ω; +, P〉, where P is the set of primes, is undecidable and, in fact, that multiplication of natural numbers is first-order definable in this structure. In the other direction, it is shown, from the same hypothesis, that the monadic second-order theory of 〈ω S, P〉 is decidable, where S is the successor function. The latter result is proved using a general result of A. L. Semenov on decidability of monadic theories, and a proof of Semenov's result is presented.

19 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Model checking
16.9K papers, 451.6K citations
89% related
Concurrency
13K papers, 347.1K citations
88% related
Logic programming
11.1K papers, 274.2K citations
88% related
Temporal logic
7.6K papers, 262K citations
87% related
Mathematical proof
13.8K papers, 374.4K citations
86% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
2023119
2022220
2021120
2020147
2019134
2018136