scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Upper ontology

About: Upper ontology is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 9767 publications have been published within this topic receiving 220721 citations. The topic is also known as: top-level ontology & foundation ontology.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper proposes a new ontology, called OM (Ontology of units of Measure and related concepts), which defines the complete set of concepts in the domain as distinguished in the textual standards, and can answer a wider range of competency questions than the existing approaches do.

74 citations

Book ChapterDOI
06 Nov 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, a framework for reasoning with multi-version ontology, in which a temporal logic is developed to serve as its semantic foundation, is proposed, which can provide a solid semantic foundation which can support various requirements on multiview ontology reasoning.
Abstract: In this paper we propose a framework for reasoning with multi-version ontology, in which a temporal logic is developed to serve as its semantic foundation. We show that the temporal logic approach can provide a solid semantic foundation which can support various requirements on multi-version ontology reasoning. We have implemented the prototype of MORE (Multi-version Ontology REasoner), which is based on the proposed framework. We have tested MORE with several realistic ontologies. In this paper, we also discuss the implementation issues and report the experiments with MORE.

74 citations

01 Jan 1999
TL;DR: This work presents SHOE, a web-based knowledge representation language that supports multiple versions of ontologies, and discusses the features of SHOE that address ontology versioning, the affects of ontology revision on SHOE web pages, and methods for implementing ontology integration using SHOE’s extension and version mechanisms.
Abstract: We discuss the problems associated with versioning ontologies in distributed environments. This is an important issue because ontologies can be of great use in structuring and querying intemet information, but many of the Intemet’s characteristics, such as distributed ownership, rapid evolution, and heterogeneity, make ontology management difficult. We present SHOE, a web-based knowledge representation language that supports multiple versions of ontologies. We then discuss the features of SHOE that address ontology versioning, the affects of ontology revision on SHOE web pages, and methods for implementing ontology integration using SHOE’s extension and version mechanisms.

74 citations

01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: The paper discusses an approach to the practical ontology development and presents the designed ontology for teaching/learning C programming.
Abstract: Development of educational ontologies is a step towards creation of sharable and reusable adaptive educational systems. Ontology as a conceptual courseware structure may work as a mind tool for effective teaching and as a visual navigation interface to the learning objects. The paper discusses an approach to the practical ontology development and presents the designed ontology for teaching/learning C programming.

73 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The generation procedure followed by TEXCOMON, the knowledge puzzle ontology learning tool, to extract concept maps from texts is described and how these concept maps are exported into a domain ontology is explained.
Abstract: One of the goals of the knowledge puzzle project is to automatically generate a domain ontology from plain text documents and use this ontology as the domain model in computer-based education. This paper describes the generation procedure followed by TEXCOMON, the knowledge puzzle ontology learning tool, to extract concept maps from texts. It also explains how these concept maps are exported into a domain ontology. Data sources and techniques deployed by TEXCOMON for ontology learning from texts are briefly described herein. Then, the paper focuses on evaluating the generated domain ontology and advocates the use of a three-dimensional evaluation: structural, semantic, and comparative. Based on a set of metrics, structural evaluations consider ontologies as graphs. Semantic evaluations rely on human expert judgment, and finally, comparative evaluations are based on comparisons between the outputs of state-of-the-art tools and those of new tools such as TEXCOMON, using the very same set of documents in order to highlight the improvements of new techniques. Comparative evaluations performed in this study use the same corpus to contrast results from TEXCOMON with those of one of the most advanced tools for ontology generation from text. Results generated by such experiments show that TEXCOMON yields superior performance, especially regarding conceptual relation learning.

73 citations


Network Information
Related Topics (5)
Ontology (information science)
57K papers, 869.1K citations
91% related
Web service
57.6K papers, 989K citations
86% related
Web page
50.3K papers, 975.1K citations
83% related
Natural language
31.1K papers, 806.8K citations
78% related
Server
79.5K papers, 1.4M citations
77% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202343
2022155
20219
20205
20199
201838