scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Topic

Value (ethics)

About: Value (ethics) is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 21347 publications have been published within this topic receiving 461372 citations.


Papers
More filters
MonographDOI
01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: In this paper, the environment as an ethical question and the value of nature as a source of inspiration for human morality and the future of nature are discussed, and a meta-ethics approach is proposed.
Abstract: Preface 1. The environment as an ethical question 2. Human morality 3. Meta-ethics 4. Normative ethics 5. Humans and other animals 6. The value of nature 7. Nature's future.

135 citations

Book
15 Dec 2003
TL;DR: The Body Impolitic is a critical study of tradition, not merely as an ornament of local and national heritage, but also as a millstone around the necks of those who are condemned to produce it as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: "The Body Impolitic" is a critical study of tradition, not merely as an ornament of local and national heritage, but also as a millstone around the necks of those who are condemned to produce it.

134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors argue that accounting acts always and already are implicated in the teleological possibilities and actualities that inform objective, intersubjective, and private experience; and, because accounting is so implicated, its legitimacy is seen to depend upon democratic adjudication of reasons for and protests against particular forms of accounting practice.

134 citations

Book
01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: In this article, Solove exposes the fallacies of pro-security arguments that have often been used to justify government surveillance and data mining, such as the "Luddite Argument", the "War-Powers Argument," the "All-or-nothing Argument," and the "Suspicionless-Searches Argument".
Abstract: "If you've got nothing to hide," many people say, "you shouldn't worry about government surveillance." Others argue that we must sacrifice privacy for security. But as Daniel J. Solove argues in this book, these arguments and many others are flawed. They are based on mistaken views about what it means to protect privacy and the costs and benefits of doing so. In addition to attacking the "Nothing-to Hide Argument," Solove exposes the fallacies of pro-security arguments that have often been used to justify government surveillance and data mining. These arguments - such as the "Luddite Argument,"the "War-Powers Argument," the "All-or-Nothing Argument," the "Suspicionless-Searches Argument," the "Deference Argument," and the "Pendulum Argument" - have skewed law and policy to favor security at the expense of privacy.The debate between privacy and security has been framed incorrectly as a zero-sum game in which we are forced to choose between one value and the other. But protecting privacy isn't fatal to security measures; it merely involves adequate oversight and regulation. The primary focus of the book is on common pro-security arguments, but Solove also discusses concrete issues of law and technology, such as the Fourth Amendment Third Party Doctrine, the First Amendment, electronic surveillance statutes, the USA-Patriot Act, the NSA surveillance program, and government data mining.

134 citations

01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: The cultural sector faces the conundrum of proving its value in a way that can be understood by decision-makers as discussed by the authors, and it will not be enough for arts and culture to resort to claiming to be a unique or special case compared with other government sectors.
Abstract: The cultural sector faces the conundrum of proving its value in a way that can be understood by decision-makers. As Smith (2010b) has noted, arts and cultural organisations face a ‘cooler climate’ than the one that prevailed during the early 2000s. As a result it will not be enough for arts and culture to resort to claiming to be a unique or special case compared with other government sectors (Matarasso 2009). Since the 1980s the value of the cultural sector has been demonstrated through the lens of ‘impact’, whether economic (e.g. Myerscough 1988) or social (e.g. Matarasso 1997). However in recent years there has been recognition, both within central government and in parts of the publically funded cultural sector, of the need to more clearly articulate the value of culture using methods which fit in with central government’s decision-making. Thus the cultural sector will need to use the tools and concepts of economics to fully state their benefits in the prevailing language of policy appraisal and evaluation (Bakhshi, Freeman and Hitchen, 2009).

134 citations


Performance
Metrics
No. of papers in the topic in previous years
YearPapers
202212
2021864
2020886
2019898
2018824
2017977