Topic
Voice
About: Voice is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 2393 publications have been published within this topic receiving 56637 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: This paper showed that vowel lengthening in English is triggered by phonological rather than physiological "voicing" and that the acquisition of the lengthening rule is in turn motivated by perceptual factors.
17 citations
TL;DR: Research is reviewed concerning the performance of several neurological groups on the perception and production of voicing contrasts in speech and a model is presented specifying the level of phonemic processing thought to be impaired for each patient group.
17 citations
TL;DR: This study presents results from high-speed imaging recordings of the voice source, that is the pharyngo-esophageal segment, in four laryngectomized men, which show that the subjects had a high overall intelligibility as judged by the listeners.
Abstract: This study presents results from high-speed imaging recordings of the voice source, that is the pharyngo-esophageal segment, in four laryngectomized men. The subjects were asked to produce VCV-syllables with voiced and voiceless stop consonants during simultaneous high-speed imaging recordings and audio recordings. A general and detailed visuo-perceptual analysis of the shape and vibratory pattern in the pharyngo-esophageal (PE-) segment was made, as well as acoustical measurements of voice onset time (VOT) and closure duration for each syllable. The syllables were also audio-perceptually evaluated by five expert listeners. Results show that the subjects had a high overall intelligibility as judged by the listeners. All four subjects were able to make opening gestures in the PE-segment while producing voiceless stop consonants. In cases where misperceptions were predominant, the acoustical analysis with spectrograms and the detailed analysis of the vibration in the PE-segment gave information about probab...
17 citations
TL;DR: This paper investigated the influence of English learning backgrounds in the perception and production of consonant clusters by Japanese native speakers and found that monolinguals made significantly more errors than bilinguals.
Abstract: Previous research has revealed that Japanese native speakers are highly likely to both perceive and produce epenthetic vowels between consonants. The goal of the present study is to investigate the influence of English learning backgrounds in the perception and production of consonant clusters by Japanese native speakers. In Experiment 1, a forced-choice AXB task to identify VC(u)CV is assigned to 17 highly fluent Japanese-English bilinguals and 22 Japanese monolinguals. Results show that monolinguals made significantly more errors than bilinguals. In Experiment 2, the influence of English proficiency on the production of consonant clusters, and the effect of consonant voicing on vowel epenthesis are investigated. The epenthetic vowels are acoustically analyzed and categorized into three degrees: full, partial and no epenthesis. The voicing combinations of the consonant clusters are C[+voice]-C[+voice], C[−voice]-C[+voice], and C[−voice]-C[−voice]. Results show that monolinguals inserted more epenthetic vowels than bilinguals, and that the influence of consonant voicing was stronger in monolinguals than bilinguals. Furthermore, monolinguals’ epenthetic vowels between C[−voice]-C[+voice] and C[−voice]-C[−voice] tended to become devoiced than bilinguals. This result suggests a stronger L1 influence on monolinguals. The results of the two experiments thus suggest that the English proficiency influences the perception and production of consonant clusters.
17 citations
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The authors reported on an investigation of voicing and aspiration of stops in Southern American English (SAE) and discusses theoretical implications of the findings for the features of contrast in SAE, concluding that SAE appears to have both.
Abstract: This paper reports on an investigation of voicing and aspiration of stops in Southern American English (SAE) and discusses theoretical implications of the findings for the features of contrast in SAE. Languages that have a two-way stop contrast generally fall into two categories: voicing languages (Russian, Dutch, Spanish) and aspirating languages (German, English, Mandarin). Many phonologists have suggested that aspirating languages have a [spread glottis] ([sg]) contrast and true voice languages a [voice] contrast (Beckman, Jessen, & Ringen 2013, Iverson & Salmons 1995). Surface phonetic cues are intrinsically connected to these phonological features; prevoicing or aspiration in certain environments implicates the phonological feature [voice] or [sg] (Beckman et al. 2013). In utterance-initial position, voicing languages have negative VOT lenis and short-lag VOT fortis stops, while aspirating languages have short-lag lenis and long-lag fortis stops. However, Helgason and Ringen (2008) show that the two-way contrast in Swedish has phonetic cues of both [sg] and [voice]; they propose that the phonological contrast in Swedish stops is between [voice] and [sg]. Rate effects support this proposal (Beckman, Helgason, McMurray, & Ringen 2011). This study analyzed utterance-initial lenis and fortis stops across all places of articulation from 13 speakers of Southern American English (SAE). Overall, 77.8% of the 951 lenis stop tokens for SAE speakers were prevoiced in utterance-initial position, with a mean VOT of -92.0 ms for lenis stops; this far exceeds data found in Lisker and Abramson (1964) and is comparable to that found for Dutch, a [voice] contrast language. Additionally, the SAE speakers had fortis VOT values comparable to aspirating languages such as NAE (Northern American English). If prevoicing implicates phonological [voice] and aspiration implicates [spread glottis], then SAE appears to have both, as is argued for Swedish in Helgason and Ringen (2008). This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/ vol22/iss1/24 U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 22.1, 2016 Prevoicing and Aspiration in Southern American English Leigh Hunnicutt and Paul A. Morris∗
17 citations