D
David C. Vladeck
Researcher at Georgetown University Law Center
Publications - 23
Citations - 194
David C. Vladeck is an academic researcher from Georgetown University Law Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Supreme court & Statute. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 23 publications receiving 175 citations. Previous affiliations of David C. Vladeck include Georgetown University & Pepperdine University.
Papers
More filters
Journal Article
Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence
TL;DR: The idea that humans could, at some point, develop machines that actually "think" for themselves and act autonomously has been embedded in our literature and culture since the beginning of civilization.
Journal ArticleDOI
Truth and Consequences: The Perils of Half-Truths and Unsubstantiated Health Claims for Dietary Supplements
TL;DR: The author examines the recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Pearson v Shalala, which struck down on First Amendment grounds the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory scheme for approving health claims for dietary supplements.
Posted Content
A Critical Examination of the FDA’s Efforts to Preempt Failure-to-Warn Claims
TL;DR: The legality and wisdom of the FDA's effort to persuade courts to find most failure-to-warn claims preempted is explored and how state damages litigation helps uncover and assess risks that are not apparent to the agency during a drug's approval process is explained, and why this "feedback loop" enables the agency to better do its job.
Journal ArticleDOI
Commercial speech and the public's health: regulating advertisements of tobacco, alcohol, high fat foods and other potentially hazardous products.
Posted Content
Judicial Triage: Reflections on the Debate over Unpublished Opinions
David C. Vladeck,G. Mitu Gulati +1 more
TL;DR: The second-order effects of the dual-track system of the federal judiciary are discussed in this paper, where the authors point out three gaps in existing discussion: the lack of consideration of second order effects, how lawyers alter their litigation strategies in response to the dual track system, and what rule of law consequences may attach to those strategic decisions.