Starting from known properties of non-specific salt effects on the surface tension at an air–water interface, we propose the first general, detailed qualitative molecular mechanism for the origins of ion-specific (Hofmeister) effects on the surface potential difference at an air–water interface; this mechanism suggests a simple model for the behaviour of water at all interfaces (including water–solute interfaces), regardless of whether the non-aqueous component is neutral or charged, polar or non-polar Specifically, water near an isolated interface is conceptually divided into three layers, each layer being 1 water-molecule thick We propose that the solute determines the behaviour of the adjacent first interfacial water layer ( I 1 ); that the bulk solution determines the behaviour of the third interfacial water layer ( I 3 ), and that both I 1 and I 3 compete for hydrogen-bonding interactions with the intervening water layer ( I 2 ), which can be thought of as a transition layer The model requires that a polar kosmotrope (polar water-structure maker) interact with I 1 more strongly than would bulk water in its place; that a chaotrope (water-structure breaker) interact with I 1 somewhat less strongly than would bulk water in its place; and that a non-polar kosmotrope (non-polar water-structure maker) interact with I 1 much less strongly than would bulk water in its place We introduce two simple new postulates to describe the behaviour of I 1 water molecules in aqueous solution The first, the ‘relative competition’ postulate, states that an I 1 water molecule, in maximizing its free energy (—δG), will favour those of its highly directional polar (hydrogen-bonding) interactions with its immediate neighbours for which the maximum pairwise enthalpy of interaction (—δ H ) is greatest; that is, it will favour the strongest interactions We describe such behaviour as ‘compliant’, since an I 1 water molecule will continually adjust its position to maximize these strong interactions Its behaviour towards its remaining immediate neighbours, with whom it interacts relatively weakly (but still favourably), we describe as ‘recalcitrant’, since it will be unable to adjust its position to maximize simultaneously these interactions The second, the ‘charge transfer’ postulate, states that the strong polar kosmotrope–water interaction has at least a small amount of covalent character, resulting in significant transfer of charge from polar kosmotropes to water–especially of negative charge from Lewis bases (both neutral and anionic); and that the water-structuring effect of polar kosmotropes is caused not only by the tight binding (partial immobilization) of the immediately adjacent ( I 1 ) water molecules, but also by an attempt to distribute among several water molecules the charge transferred from the solute When extensive, cumulative charge transfer to solvent occurs, as with macromolecular polyphosphates, the solvation layer (the layer of solvent whose behaviour is determined by the solute) can become up to 5- or 6-water-molecules thick We then use the ‘relative competition’ postulate, which lends itself to simple diagramming, in conjunction with the ‘charge transfer’ postulate to provide a new, startlingly simple and direct qualitative explanation for the heat of dilution of neutral polar solutes and the temperature dependence of relative viscosity of neutral polar solutes in aqueous solution This explanation also requires the new and intriguing general conclusion that as the temperature of aqueous solutions is lowered towards o °C, solutes tend to acquire a non-uniform distribution in the solution, becoming increasingly likely to cluster 2 water molecules away from other solutes and surfaces (the driving force for this process being the conversion of transition layer water to bulk water) The implications of these conclusions for understanding the mechanism of action of general (gaseous) anaesthetics and other important interfacial phenomena are then addressed

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0033583500005369

The Hofmeister effect and the behaviour of water at interfaces.

This article presents evidence for the existence of a specific linear relationship between the entropy change and the enthalpy change in a variety of processes of small solutes in water solution. The processes include solvation of ions and nonelectrolytes, hydrolysis, oxidation–reduction, ionization of weak electrolytes, and quenching of indole fluorescence among others. The values of the proportionality constant, called the compensation temperature, lie in a relatively narrow range, from about 250 to 315 °K, for all these processes. Such behavior can be a consequence of experimental errors but for a number of the processes the precision of the data is sufficient to show that the enthalpy–entropy compensation pattern is real. It is tentatively concluded that the pattern is real, very common and a consequence of the properties of liquid water as a solvent regardless of the solutes and the solute processes studied. As such the phenomenon requires that theoretical treatments of solute processes in water be expanded by inclusion of a specific treatment of the characteristic of water responsible for compensation behavior. The possible bases of the effect are proposed to be temperature-independent heat-capacity changes and/or shifts in concentrations of the two phenomenologically significant species of water. The relationship of these alternatives to the two-state process of water suggested by spectroscopic and relaxation studies is examined. The existence of a similar and probably identical relationship between enthalpy and entropy change in a variety of protein reactions suggests that liquid water plays a direct role in many protein processes and may be a common participant in the physiological function of proteins. It is proposed that the linear enthalpy–entropy relationship be used as a diagnostic test for the participation of water in protein processes. On this basis the catalytic processes of chymotrypsin and acetylcholinesterase are dominated by the properties of bulk water. The binding of oxygen by hemoglobin may fall in the same category. Similarities and differences in the behavior of small-solute and protein processes are examined to show how they may be related. No positive conclusions are established, but it is possible that protein processes are coupled to water via expansions and contractions of the protein and that in general the special pattern of enthalpy–entropy compensation is a consequent of the properties of water which require that expansions and contractions of solutes effect changes in the free volume of the nearby liquid water. It is shown that proteins can be expected to respond to changes in nearby water and interfacial free energy by expansions and contractions. Such responses may explain a variety of currently unexplained characteristics of protein solutions. More generally, the enthalpy–entropy compensation pattern appears to be the thermodynamic manifestation of “structure making” and “structure breaking,” operationally defined terms much used in discussions of water solutions. If so, the compensation pattern is ubiquitous and requires re-examination of a large body of molecular interpretations derived from quantitative studies of processes in water. Theories of processes in water may have to be expanded to accommodate this aspect of water behavior.

Enthalpy-entropy compensation phenomena in water solutions of proteins and small molecules: a ubiquitous property of water.

When a simple alcohol such as methanol or ethanol is mixed with water, the entropy of the system increases far less than expected for an ideal solution of randomly mixed molecules. This well-known effect has been attributed to hydrophobic headgroups creating ice-like or clathrate-like structures in the surrounding water, although experimental support for this hypothesis is scarce. In fact, an increasing amount of experimental and theoretical work suggests that the hydrophobic headgroups of alcohol molecules in aqueous solution cluster together. However, a consistent description of the details of this self-association is lacking. Here we use neutron diffraction with isotope substitution to probe the molecular-scale structure of a concentrated alcohol–water mixture (7:3 molar ratio). Our data indicate that most of the water molecules exist as small hydrogen-bonded strings and clusters in a 'fluid' of close-packed methyl groups, with water clusters bridging neighbouring methanol hydroxyl groups through hydrogen bonding. This behaviour suggests that the anomalous thermodynamics of water–alcohol systems arises from incomplete mixing at the molecular level and from retention of remnants of the three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network structure of bulk water.

Molecular segregation observed in a concentrated alcohol–water solution

Publisher Summary It is noted that the gel is the most typical state for polysaccharides, both in biological and artificial systems. The polymer chains usually form an interconnected network that gives rise to characteristic texture and properties. Polysaccharide gels have various biological functions essentially in the wall of the young plant-cell, in animal fluids and connective tissues, and in the bacterial capsule. They also have widespread commercial uses, particularly in foodstuffs, cosmetics, paper, and textiles. The gel state is considered characteristic of polysaccharides in the way that polypeptides and globular proteins can characteristically occur as compact particles having a high degree of internal order, or nucleic acids can occur as chain pairs in highly ordered and complementary association. Polysaccharides also make a distinctive contribution to natural-polymer chemistry in showing, in terms of molecular structure, interaction of chain molecules in three-dimensions to provide physical and biological properties of gels.

Structure, Conformation, and Mechanism in the Formation of Polysaccharide Gels and Networks

Publisher Summary This chapter reviews the effects of alcohols on microorganisms. Alcohols are ubiquitous small molecules, which are produced both chemically and as products of microbial fermentation. Accumulation of alcohols in the microbial environment represents a form of environmental stress, analogous to extremes in pH value and temperature. The chapter discusses the action of ethanol and other alcohols on microorganisms, explains several important mechanisms of action. Alcohols have been employed for many years both as a disinfectant and as a preservative. Concentrations of ethanol above 15% result in immediate inactivation of most vegetative organisms, with spores being considerably more resistant. Low concentrations of ethanol also render bacteria more sensitive to inactivation by ionizing radiation and by lipophilic acids. The chapter concludes that the basic actions of alcohols on both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms share the same general principles. These effects appear to be dominated by the physicochemical properties of alcohols rather than involving specific receptors. All hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in the cytosolic and envelope components of cells can potentially be affected. These include membranes, conformations of enzymes and macromolecules, activity coefficients of metabolites, permitivity, ionization potentials, pK values of functional groups, and pH value.

F. Franks

Papers

The structural properties of alcohol–water mixtures