scispace - formally typeset
J

John M. Griffin

Researcher at University of Texas at Austin

Publications -  93
Citations -  10638

John M. Griffin is an academic researcher from University of Texas at Austin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Stock (geology) & Institutional investor. The author has an hindex of 43, co-authored 83 publications receiving 9819 citations. Previous affiliations of John M. Griffin include Yale University & Arizona State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Book-to-Market Equity, Distress Risk, and Stock Returns

TL;DR: The authors examined the relationship between book-to-market equity, distress risk, and stock returns among firms with the highest distress risk as proxied by Ohlson's ~1980! O-score, finding that the difference in returns between high and low book-tomarket securities is more than twice as large as that in other firms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Momentum Investing and Business Cycle Risk: Evidence from Pole to Pole

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined whether macroeconomic risk can explain momentum profits internationally and showed that momentum profits around the world are economically large and statistically reliable in both good and bad economic states.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are the Fama and French Factors Global or Country Specific

TL;DR: This article examined whether country-specific or global versions of Fama and French's three-factor model better explain time-series variation in international stock returns and found that domestic factor models explain much more time series variation in returns and generally have lower pricing errors than the world factor model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do Market Efficiency Measures Yield Correct Inferences? A Comparison of Developed and Emerging Markets

TL;DR: The authors found that short-term reversal, post-earnings drift, and momentum strategies earn similar returns in emerging and developed markets using data from 56 markets, and showed that commonly used efficiency tests can yield misleading inferences because they do not control for the information environment.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Dynamics of Institutional and Individual Trading

TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied the daily and intradaily cross-sectional relation between stock returns and the trading of institutional and individual investors in Nasdaq 100 securities and found that the top performing decile of securities is 23.9% more likely to be bought in net by institutions and sold by individuals than those in the bottom performance decile.