scispace - formally typeset
J

John Shanahan

Researcher at DePaul University

Publications -  5
Citations -  12

John Shanahan is an academic researcher from DePaul University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Library classification & Paratext. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 5 publications receiving 11 citations.

Papers
More filters

Reading Chicago Reading: Quantitative Analysis of a Repeating Literary Program.

TL;DR: This essay presents quantitative capture and predictive modeling for one of the largest and longest running mass reading programs of the past two decades: “One Book One Chicago” (OBOC) sponsored by the Chicago Public Library (CPL).
Journal ArticleDOI

From Drama to Science: Margaret Cavendish as Vanishing Mediator

TL;DR: This paper examined Margaret Cavendish's dramatic and scientific works together to find shared features among them and argued that Cavendish contributed to the conceptual formation of the new science of the seventeenth century in two ways: first, in the imagination of highly forensic spaces (that is, spaces for the examination of rival hypotheses), and second, by focusing on the inherent theatricality of empirical experimentation.

Real and Imagined Geography at City-Scale: Sentiment Analysis of Chicago's "One Book" Program.

Ana Lucic, +1 more
TL;DR: Comparison circulation data is reported for three recent OBOC choices that are Chicagocentered and three that are not Chicago-centered.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Circulation modeling of library book promotions

TL;DR: It is shown that, over six recent offerings of the ``One Book'' program, the books vary widely in their uptake by library patrons at different branches, and these differences cannot be entirely explained by demographics or the library's promotional strategies.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Unsupervised clustering with smoothing for detecting paratext boundaries in scanned documents

TL;DR: This study describes a method for paratext detection based on smoothed unsupervised clustering and shows that this method is more accurate than simple heuristics, especially for non-fiction works, and edited works with larger amounts ofParatext.