scispace - formally typeset
L

Lee Goldman

Researcher at Harvard University

Publications -  194
Citations -  27928

Lee Goldman is an academic researcher from Harvard University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cost effectiveness & Myocardial infarction. The author has an hindex of 79, co-authored 191 publications receiving 27129 citations. Previous affiliations of Lee Goldman include University of California, Berkeley & Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Multifactorial Index of Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgical Procedures

TL;DR: If validated by prospective application, the multifactorial index may allow preoperative estimation of cardiac risk independent of direct surgical risk.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards.

TL;DR: Qualitative standards that can be used to decide whether a prediction rule is suitable for adoption in a clinician's practice are described and applied to 33 reports of prediction rules.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The SUPPORT investigators (Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments)

TL;DR: Patients and caregivers should be aware of the likelihood of poor outcomes following hospitalization for exacerbation of COPD associated with hypercarbia, and are advised to report a good, very good, or excellent quality of life.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale.

Lee Goldman, +3 more
- 01 Dec 1981 - 
TL;DR: The easily administered Specific Activity Scale was equally reproducible and valid when used by a nonphysician and was especially better than the other systems for the evaluation of true class II patients and was significantly less likely to underestimate treadmill performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

TL;DR: It is concluded that advances in diagnostic technology have not reduced the value of the autopsy, and that a goal-directed autopsy remains a vital component in the assurance of good medical care.