scispace - formally typeset
M

Mary Kalfoss

Researcher at University of Oslo

Publications -  36
Citations -  913

Mary Kalfoss is an academic researcher from University of Oslo. The author has contributed to research in topics: Quality of life & Construct validity. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 36 publications receiving 778 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality of life in Polish respondents: psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL-Bref.

TL;DR: Correlational and multivariate analyses confirmed the relevancy of individual items and domains supporting the construct validity of the Bref, and the physical domain was found to be strongest in differentiating between unhealthy and healthy subjects, followed by psychological and social domains.
Journal ArticleDOI

The conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in older adults: a review of empirical studies published during 1994-2006.

TL;DR: Quality control standards, which can guide measurement assessment and subsequent data interpretation, are needed to enhance more consistent reporting of the psychometric properties of QoL instruments utilized.
Journal ArticleDOI

The importance of facets of quality of life to older adults: an international investigation.

TL;DR: It appears that many of the physical aspects of QOL such as energy, freedom from pain, ability to do activities of daily living and to move around are particularly important to older adults.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparing the importance of different aspects of quality of life to older adults across diverse cultures

TL;DR: Understanding the self-reported importance of diverse aspects of QOL for different cultures and for healthy and less healthy people may assist national and international policy makers to decide on priorities for the development of programmes for the ageing population.
Journal ArticleDOI

The suitability of the WHOQOL–BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults

TL;DR: Empirical support was found for the construct validity of the WHOQOL–BREF in older adults, and it appears that the instrument is reliable, valid, and facilitates cross-cultural comparisons.