Preface to the Princeton Landmarks in Biology Edition vii Preface xi Symbols Used xiii 1. The Importance of Islands 3 2. Area and Number of Speicies 8 3. Further Explanations of the Area-Diversity Pattern 19 4. The Strategy of Colonization 68 5. Invasibility and the Variable Niche 94 6. Stepping Stones and Biotic Exchange 123 7. Evolutionary Changes Following Colonization 145 8. Prospect 181 Glossary 185 References 193 Index 201

The Theory of Island Biogeography

The invasion of ecosystems by exotic species is currently viewed as one of the most important sources of biodiversity loss. The largest part of this loss occurs on islands, where indigenous species have often evolved in the absence of strong competition, herbivory, parasitism or predation. As a result, introduced species thrive in those optimal insular ecosystems affecting their plant food, competitors or animal prey. As islands are characterised by a high rate of endemism, the impacted populations often correspond to local subspecies or even unique species. One of the most important taxa concerning biological invasions on islands is mammals. A small number of mammal species is responsible for most of the damage to invaded insular ecosystems: rats, cats, goats, rabbits, pigs and a few others. The effect of alien invasive species may be simple or very complex, especially since a large array of invasive species, mammals and others, can be present simultaneously and interact among themselves as well as with the indigenous species. In most cases, introduced species generally have a strong impact and they often are responsible for the impoverishment of the local flora and fauna. The best response to these effects is almost always to control the alien population, either by regularly reducing their numbers, or better still, by eradicating the population as a whole from the island. Several types of methods are currently used: physical (trapping, shooting), chemical (poisoning) and biological (e.g. directed use of diseases). Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, depending on the mammal species targeted. The best strategy is almost always to combine several methods. Whatever the strategy used, its long-term success is critically dependent on solid support from several different areas, including financial support, staff commitment, and public support, to name only a few. In many cases, the elimination of the alien invasive species is followed by a rapid and often spectacular recovery of the impacted local populations. However, in other cases, the removal of the alien is not sufficient for the damaged ecosystem to revert to its former state, and complementary actions, such as species re-introduction, are required. A third situation may be widespread: the sudden removal of the alien species may generate a further disequilibrium, resulting in further or greater damage to the ecosystem. Given the numerous and complex population interactions among island species, it is difficult to predict the outcome of the removal of key species, such as a top predator. This justifies careful pre-control study and preparation prior to initiating the eradication of an alien species, in order to avoid an ecological catastrophe. In addition, long-term monitoring of the post-eradication ecosystem is crucial to assess success and prevent reinvasion.

http://max2.ese.u-psud.fr/epc/conservation/PDFs/BiolReviews.pdf

Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact

Island populations are much more prone to extinction than mainland populations. The reasons for this remain controversial. If inbreeding and loss of genetic variation are involved, then genetic variation must be lower on average in island than mainland populations. Published data on levels of genetic variation for allozymes, nuclear DNA markers, mitochondrial DNA, inversions and quantitative characters in island and mainland populations were analysed. A large and highly significant majority of island populations have less allozyme genetic variation than their mainland counterparts (165 of 202 comparisons), the average reduction being 29 per cent. The magnitude of differences was related to dispersal ability. There were related differences for all the other measures. Island endemic species showed lower genetic variation than related mainland species in 34 of 38 cases. The proportionate reduction in genetic variation was significantly greater in island endemic than in nonendemic island populations in mammals and birds, but not in insects. Genetic factors cannot be discounted as a cause of higher extinction rates of island than mainland populations.

/pdf/do-island-populations-have-less-genetic-variation-than-17siuwjycj.pdf

Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations

The evolutionary significance of genetic diversity of proteins in nature remains controversial despite the numerous protein studies conducted electrophoretically during the last two decades. Ironically, the discovery of extensive protein polymorphisms in nature (reviewed by Lewontin, 1974; Powell, 1975; Selander, 1976; Nevo 1978, 1983b; Hamrick et al., 1979; Nelson and Hedgecock, 1980), did not resolve the disagreement between the die ho torn ou s explanatory models of selection (e.g., Ayala, 1977; Milkman, 1978; Clarke, 1979; Wills, 1981) versus neutrality (Kimura, 1968; Kimura and Chta, 1971; Nei, 1975; and modifications in Kimura, 1979atb). The more general problem of the relative importance of the evolutionary forces interacting in genetic population differentiation at the molecular levels of proteins and DNA, i.e., mutation, migration, natural selection and genetic drift, remains now as enigmatic as ever.

The Evolutionary Significance of Genetic Diversity: Ecological, Demographic and Life History Correlates

Natural disturbances such as lava flows, landslides and glacial moraines, and human-damaged sites such as pavement, road edges and mine wastes often leave little or no soil or biological legacy. This 2003 book provided the first comprehensive summary of how plant, animal and microbial communities develop under the harsh conditions following such dramatic disturbances. The authors examine the basic principles that determine ecosystem development and apply the general rules to the urgent practical need for promoting the reclamation of damaged lands. Written for ecologists concerned with disturbance, landscape dynamics, restoration, life histories, invasions, modeling, soil formation and community or population dynamics, this book will also serve as an authoritative text for graduate students and a valuable reference for professionals involved in land management.

/pdf/primary-succession-and-ecosystem-rehabilitation-46xfnlnrj7.pdf

Primary Succession and Ecosystem Rehabilitation

How to respond to growing elephant numbers in the Kruger National Park and elsewhere in southern Africa continues to be a contentious issue. In contrast to the public perception, scientists have attained a high degree of consensus on the ecological basis for such decisions. In this article we summarize these ecological principles and the management responses that are indicated, in order to counter some of the misunderstanding that has been evident in the popular media.

A scientific perspective on the management of elephants in the Kruger National Park and elsewhere : elephant conservation

http://www7.nau.edu/mpcer/direnet/publications/publications_d/files/deBeer-2006.pdf

Elephants and low rainfall alter woody vegetation in Etosha National Park, Namibia

Do landscape heterogeneity and water distribution explain aspects of elephant home range in southern Africa's arid savannas?

This paper reviews the history of the feral cat eradication programme on sub-Antarctic Marion Island based on unpublished minutes of meetings, reports, letters, theses and published scientific papers; and reflects on the outcome of the eradication campaign. The 19-year programme comprised seven phases, commencing with a description of the effect of the cats on the Marion Island ecosystem, the characteristics of the cat population and the formulation of a management policy (phase 1: 1974-1976). Methods for control were selected and preparations were made for the implementation of the primary control mea- sure, biological control with the feline panleucopaenia virus (phase 2: 1976/77). The virus was released in 1977 (phase 3: 1977), followed by the determination of its effects (phase 4: 1977-1980). Monitoring of the effects of the virus continued, and the secondary control measure of hunting at night was tested (phase 5: 1981-1983). Full-scale implementation of hunting and continued monitoring of the effects of both the disease and hunting followed (phase 6: 1986-1989). The inclusion of intensive trapping and poisoning as tertiary control measures culminated in the final eradication of cats from Marion Island in 1991 (phase 7: 1989-1993).

A review of the successful eradication of feral cats from sub-Antarctic Marion Island, Southern Indian Ocean

https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/21519/Roever_Functional_2013.pdf?sequence=1

R. J. van Aarde

Papers

A scientific perspective on the management of elephants in the Kruger National Park and elsewhere : elephant conservation

Elephants and low rainfall alter woody vegetation in Etosha National Park, Namibia

Do landscape heterogeneity and water distribution explain aspects of elephant home range in southern Africa's arid savannas?

A review of the successful eradication of feral cats from sub-Antarctic Marion Island, Southern Indian Ocean

Functional connectivity within conservation networks: Delineating corridors for African elephants