Psychological Factors Affecting the Outcome of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Patient expectations and their fulfilment are an important factor in determining patient-reported outcome and satisfaction of hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to examine the expectations of patients undergoing THR and TKR, and to identify differences in expectations, predictors of high expectations and the relationship between the fulfilment of expectations and patient-reported outcome measures. During the study period, patients who underwent 346 THRs and 323 TKRs completed an expectation questionnaire, Oxford score and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) score pre-operatively. At one year post-operatively, the Oxford score, SF-12, patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment were assessed. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed. Improvements in mobility and daytime pain were the most important expectations in both groups. Expectation level did not differ between THR and TKR. Poor Oxford score, younger age and male gender significantly predicted high pre-operative expectations (p < 0.001). The level of pre-operative expectation was not significantly associated with the fulfilment of expectations or outcome. THR better met the expectations identified as important by patients. TKR failed to meet expectations of kneeling, squatting and stair climbing. High fulfilment of expectation in both THR and TKR was significantly predicted by young age, greater improvements in Oxford score and high pre-operative mental health scores. The fulfilment of expectations was highly correlated with satisfaction.

Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee

The aim of this study was to perform a cost–utility
analysis of total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR). Arthritis is
a disabling condition that leads to long-term deterioration in quality
of life. Total joint replacement, despite being one of the greatest
advances in medicine of the modern era, has recently come under
scrutiny. The National Health Service (NHS) has competing demands,
and resource allocation is challenging in times of economic restraint. Patients
who underwent THR (n = 348) or TKR (n = 323) between January and
July 2010 in one Scottish region were entered into a prospective
arthroplasty database. A health–utility score was derived from the
EuroQol (EQ-5D) score pre-operatively and at one year, and was combined
with individual life expectancy to derive the quality-adjusted life years
(QALYs) gained. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare
QALYs gained between procedures, while controlling for baseline
differences. The number of QALYs gained was higher after THR than
after TKR (6.5 vs 4.0 years, p < 0.001). The
cost per QALY for THR was £1372 compared with £2101 for TKR. The
predictors of an increase in QALYs gained were poorer health before
surgery (p < 0.001) and younger age (p < 0.001). General health
(EQ-5D VAS) showed greater improvement after THR than after TKR
(p < 0.001). This study provides up-to-date cost-effectiveness
data for total joint replacement. THR and TKR are extremely effective
both clinically and in terms of cost effectiveness, with costs that
compare favourably to those of other medical interventions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:115–21.

Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: A health economic analysis

https://www.oarsijournal.com/article/S1063-4584(13)00940-0/pdf

Anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study

Despite the overall effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA), a subset of patients remain dissatisfied with their results because of persistent pain or functional limitations. It is therefore important to develop predictive tools capable of identifying patients at risk for poor outcomes before surgery. The purpose of this study was to use preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores to predict which patients undergoing THA are most likely to experience a clinically meaningful change in functional outcome 1 year after surgery. A retrospective cohort study design was used to evaluate preoperative and 1-year postoperative SF-12 version 2 (SF12v2) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) scores from 537 selected patients who underwent primary unilateral THA. Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) were calculated using a distribution-based method. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate threshold values, defined as the levels at which substantial changes occurred, and their predictive ability. MCID values for HOOS and SF12v2 physical component summary (PCS) scores were calculated to be 9.1 and 4.6, respectively. We analyzed the effect of SF12v2 mental component summary (MCS) scores, which measure mental and emotional health, on SF12v2 PCS and HOOS threshold values. Threshold values for preoperative HOOS and PCS scores were a maximum of 51.0 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.74; p < 0.001) and 32.5 (AUC, 0.62; p < 0.001), respectively. As preoperative mental and emotional health improved, which was reflected by a higher MCS score, HOOS and PCS threshold values also increased. When preoperative mental and emotional health were taken into account, both HOOS and PCS threshold values’ predictive ability improved (AUCs increased to 0.77 and 0.69, respectively). We identified PROM threshold values that predict clinically meaningful improvements in functional outcome after THA. Patients with a higher level of preoperative function, as suggested by HOOS or PCS scores above the defined threshold values, are less likely to obtain meaningful improvement after THA. Lower preoperative mental and emotional health decreases the likelihood of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in function after THA. The results of this study may be used to facilitate discussion between physicians and patients regarding the expected benefit after THA and to support the development of patient-based informed decision-making tools. For example, despite significant disease, patients with high preoperative function, as measured by PROM scores, may choose to delay surgery given the low likelihood of experiencing a meaningful improvement postoperatively. Similarly, patients with notably low MCS scores might best be counseled to address mental health issues before embarking on surgery. Level III, prognostic study.

/pdf/john-charnley-award-preoperative-patient-reported-outcome-47kwuu08k9.pdf

John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA.

We conducted a prospective cohort study investigating the rate and predictors of dissatisfaction among patients after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Eight hundred fifty patients were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively using Patient Reported Outcome Measures. There was a 7% rate of dissatisfaction after THA. After univariate analysis, depression, preoperative Short Form 12 mental component score, and symptomatic arthritis of another major joint predicted dissatisfaction at 1 year, but after multivariate analysis, only symptomatic arthritis in another major joint was significant. The development of a major complication did not predict dissatisfaction. Satisfaction also correlates strongly with postoperative functional scores, relief of pain, restoration of function, and success in meeting patient expectations. Pain relief and expectation management are critical in maximizing patient satisfaction after THA.

Raymond E. Anakwe

Papers

Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients.