scispace - formally typeset
V

Veena S. Rao

Researcher at Narayana Health

Publications -  38
Citations -  1117

Veena S. Rao is an academic researcher from Narayana Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Prothrombinase. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 37 publications receiving 1048 citations. Previous affiliations of Veena S. Rao include Indian Institute of Science & National University of Singapore.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Friend Turns Foe: Transformation of Anti-Inflammatory HDL to Proinflammatory HDL during Acute-Phase Response

TL;DR: The functional heterogeneity of HDL is discussed, how alterations in these particles in inflammatory states result in loss of both antioxidant activity and reverse cholesterol transport in relation to atherosclerosis, and the need for assays to predict its functionality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Procoagulant proteins from snake venoms.

TL;DR: An overview of snake venom procoagulant factors is presented and it is shown that the prothrombin activators with serine proteinase activity are structurally and functionally similar to mammalian coagulation factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pseutarin C, a prothrombin activator from Pseudonaja textilis venom: its structural and functional similarity to mammalian coagulation factor Xa-Va complex.

TL;DR: In this paper, a protein complex consisting of an enzymatic and a non-enzymatic subunit was extracted from the venom of the Australian brown snake (Pseudonaja textilis) and their interactions with bovine factor Xa and factor Va were studied.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevalence and component analysis of metabolic syndrome: An Indian atherosclerosis research study perspective

TL;DR: In conclusion, the revision of definition criteria for MS with lowered cut-offs for WC and BMI is critical for the accurate assessment of MS among Asian Indians.
Journal ArticleDOI

Application of cardiovascular disease risk prediction models and the relevance of novel biomarkers to risk stratification in Asian Indians

TL;DR: The argument that alternative approaches to risk stratification are required in order to make them more adaptable and applicable to different populations with varying risk factor and disease patterns is substantiated.