SUMMARY The common approach to the multiplicity problem calls for controlling the familywise error rate (FWER). This approach, though, has faults, and we point out a few. A different approach to problems of multiple significance testing is presented. It calls for controlling the expected proportion of falsely rejected hypotheses -the false discovery rate. This error rate is equivalent to the FWER when all hypotheses are true but is smaller otherwise. Therefore, in problems where the control of the false discovery rate rather than that of the FWER is desired, there is potential for a gain in power. A simple sequential Bonferronitype procedure is proved to control the false discovery rate for independent test statistics, and a simulation study shows that the gain in power is substantial. The use of the new procedure and the appropriateness of the criterion are illustrated with examples.

/pdf/controlling-the-false-discovery-rate-a-practical-and-431ouqffk6.pdf

Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

In comparative high-throughput sequencing assays, a fundamental task is the analysis of count data, such as read counts per gene in RNA-seq, for evidence of systematic changes across experimental conditions. Small replicate numbers, discreteness, large dynamic range and the presence of outliers require a suitable statistical approach. We present DESeq2, a method for differential analysis of count data, using shrinkage estimation for dispersions and fold changes to improve stability and interpretability of estimates. This enables a more quantitative analysis focused on the strength rather than the mere presence of differential expression. The DESeq2 package is available at http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html
 .

/pdf/moderated-estimation-of-fold-change-and-dispersion-for-rna-3ywnbkcan0.pdf

Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2

Whole-genome association studies (WGAS) bring new computational, as well as analytic, challenges to researchers. Many existing genetic-analysis tools are not designed to handle such large data sets in a convenient manner and do not necessarily exploit the new opportunities that whole-genome data bring. To address these issues, we developed PLINK, an open-source C/C++ WGAS tool set. With PLINK, large data sets comprising hundreds of thousands of markers genotyped for thousands of individuals can be rapidly manipulated and analyzed in their entirety. As well as providing tools to make the basic analytic steps computationally efficient, PLINK also supports some novel approaches to whole-genome data that take advantage of whole-genome coverage. We introduce PLINK and describe the five main domains of function: data management, summary statistics, population stratification, association analysis, and identity-by-descent estimation. In particular, we focus on the estimation and use of identity-by-state and identity-by-descent information in the context of population-based whole-genome studies. This information can be used to detect and correct for population stratification and to identify extended chromosomal segments that are shared identical by descent between very distantly related individuals. Analysis of the patterns of segmental sharing has the potential to map disease loci that contain multiple rare variants in a population-based linkage analysis.

http://ibgwww.colorado.edu/cdrom2009/ScriptsA/purcell/GWAS/boulder_09_plink_intro.pdf

PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses

limma is an R/Bioconductor software package that provides an integrated solution for analysing data from gene expression experiments. It contains rich features for handling complex experimental designs and for information borrowing to overcome the problem of small sample sizes. Over the past decade, limma has been a popular choice for gene discovery through differential expression analyses of microarray and high-throughput PCR data. The package contains particularly strong facilities for reading, normalizing and exploring such data. Recently, the capabilities of limma have been significantly expanded in two important directions. First, the package can now perform both differential expression and differential splicing analyses of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. All the downstream analysis tools previously restricted to microarray data are now available for RNA-seq as well. These capabilities allow users to analyse both RNA-seq and microarray data with very similar pipelines. Second, the package is now able to go past the traditional gene-wise expression analyses in a variety of ways, analysing expression profiles in terms of co-regulated sets of genes or in terms of higher-order expression signatures. This provides enhanced possibilities for biological interpretation of gene expression differences. This article reviews the philosophy and design of the limma package, summarizing both new and historical features, with an emphasis on recent enhancements and features that have not been previously described.

/pdf/limma-powers-differential-expression-analyses-for-rna-4yl7ae3arh.pdf

limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies

In comparative high-throughput sequencing assays, a fundamental task is the analysis of count data, such as read counts per gene in RNA-Seq data, for evidence of systematic changes across experimental conditions. Small replicate numbers, discreteness, large dynamic range and the presence of outliers require a suitable statistical approach. We present DESeq2, a method for differential analysis of count data. DESeq2 uses shrinkage estimation for dispersions and fold changes to improve stability and interpretability of the estimates. This enables a more quantitative analysis focused on the strength rather than the mere presence of differential expression and facilitates downstream tasks such as gene ranking and visualization. DESeq2 is available as an R/Bioconductor package.

/pdf/moderated-estimation-of-fold-change-and-dispersion-for-rna-59glcgpwlk.pdf

The problem of multiple comparisons is discussed in the context of medical research. The need for more powerful procedures than classical multiple comparison procedures is indicated. To this end some new, general and simple procedures are discussed and demonstrated by two examples from the medical literature: the neuropsychologic effects of unidentified childhood exposure to lead, and the sleep patterns of sober chronic alcoholics.

More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing.

PROCEDURES BASED ON CLASSICAL APPROACHES FOR FIXED--EFFECTS LINEAR MODELS WITH NORMAL HOMOSCEDASTIC INDEPENDENT ERRORS. Some Theory of Multiple Comparisons Procedure Fixed--effects Linear Models. Single--step Procedures for Pairwise and More General Comparisons Among All Treatments. Stepwise Procedures for Pairwise and More General Comparisons Among All Treatments. Procedures for Some Other Nonhierarchical Finite Families of Comparisons. Designing Experiments for Multiple Comparisons. PROCEDURES FOR OTHER MODELS AND PROBLEMS, AND PROCEDURES BASED ON ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES. Procedures for One--way Layouts with Unequal Variances. Procedures for Some Mixed--effects Models. Distribution--free and Robust Procedures. Some Miscellaneous Multiple Comparison Problems. Optimal Procedures Using Decision--theoretic, Bayesian, and Other Approaches. Appendixes. Tables. References. Index.

Multiple Comparison Procedures

Multiple Comparison Procedures.

A new approach to problems of multiple significance testing was presented in Benjamini and Hochberg (1995), which calls for controlling the expected ratio of the number of erroneous rejections to the number of rejections–the False Discovery Rate (FDR). The procedure given there was shown to control the FDR for independent test statistics. When some of the hypotheses are in fact false, that procedure is too conservative. We present here an adaptive procedure, where the number of true null hypotheses is estimated first as in Hochberg and Benjamini (1990), and this estimate is used in the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg (1995). The result is still a simple stepwise procedure, to which we also give a graphical companion. The new procedure is used in several examples drawn from educational and behavioral studies, addressing problems in multi-center studies, subset analysis and meta-analysis. The examples vary in the number of hypotheses tested, and the implication of the new procedure on the conclusions. I...

Yosef Hochberg

Papers

Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing.

Multiple Comparison Procedures

Multiple Comparison Procedures.

On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics