Secondary caries and microleakage

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reinforcing effect of fibre-reinforced composites (FRC) applied in premolar teeth with different techniques and minimally invasive post space preparation. Fifty extracted and endodontically treated premolar teeth were used. The teeth were divided into five groups (n = 10) depending on the restorative technique (Groups 1-5). Group 1: one single conventional post, Group 2: one main conventional and one collateral post, Group 3: one elastic post, Group 4: one main elastic and one collateral post, and Group 5: individual post formed of elastic posts. After cementation and core build-up, the specimens were submitted to static fracture resistance test. Fracture thresholds and fracture patterns were measured and evaluated. Group 4 showed the highest average fracture resistance among the tested groups. The multi-post techniques (group 2 and 4) exhibited statistically higher fracture resistance compared to group 1. Regarding fracture patterns, there was no statistically significant difference between the tested groups. Within the limitations of this study, the application of multiple elastic or conventional FRC posts or a single elastic post in the same root canal is beneficial in terms of fracture resistance compared to a single conventional FRC post. The elasticity or the number of posts did not influence the fracture patterns.

In vitro fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with fibre-reinforced composite posts using a single or a multi-post technique.

This first article in the series (Part I) aims to present an updated rationale and treatment approach for indirect adhesive posterior restorations based on the best scientific and long-term clinical evidence available. The proposed treatment concept relies on the basic ideas of (1) the placement of an adhesive base/liner (Dual Bonding [DB] and Cavity Design Optimization [CDO]) and, when needed, (2) a simultaneous relocation of deep cervical margins (Cervical Margin Relocation [CMR]), prior to (3) impression taking to ensure a more conservative preparation and easier-to-follow clinical steps, and the use of (4) a highly filled, light-curing restorative material for the cementation (Controlled Adhesive Cementation [CAC]), together with restoration insertion facilitation, the application of sonic/ultrasonic energy, and/or material heating. The suggested clinical protocol will help the practitioner to eliminate the most frequently experienced difficulties relating to the preparation, isolation, impression taking and cementation of tooth-colored inlays and onlays. This protocol can be applied to both ceramics and composites as no material has been proven to be the most feasible or reliable in all clinical indications regarding its physicochemical and handling characteristics. For the time being, however, we have to regard such indirect restorations as a biosubstitution due to the monolithic nature of the restoration, with still very imperfect replication of the specific natural dentin-enamel assemblage.

Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part I. Historical perspectives and clinical rationale for a biosubstitutive approach.

Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.

Marginal leakage of bulk fill composites in Class II restorations: A microCT and digital microscope analysis

Clinical Relevance In vitro research remains of primary importance to selecting and validating the techniques and products to be used in vivo. However, the clinical predictive value of such tests n...

A Argente

Papers

In Vitro Performance of Class I and II Composite Restorations: A Literature Review on Nondestructive Laboratory Trials—Part I