scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Agnes Soucat published in 2009"


01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: The Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health with special applications for low- and middle-income countries and its applications for lo... is published.
Abstract: Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health , Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health , کتابخانه دیجیتال جندی شاپور اهواز

93 citations


Book
01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health with special applications for low and middle-income countries as discussed by the authors, Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluation of Human Resources for Health with Special Applications for Low and Middle-Income Countries.
Abstract: Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health with special applications for low- and middle-income countries , Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health with special applications for lo... , کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران

65 citations


01 Jan 2009
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the impact of P4P on the use and quality of prenatal, institutional delivery, and child preventive care using data produced from a prospective quasi-experimental evaluation nested into the national rollout of P2P in Rwanda.
Abstract: Paying for performance (P4P) provides financial incentives for providers to increase the use and quality of care. P4P can affect health care by providing incentives for providers to put more effort into specific activities, and by increasing the amount of resources available to finance the delivery of services. This paper evaluates the impact of P4P on the use and quality of prenatal, institutional delivery, and child preventive care using data produced from a prospective quasi-experimental evaluation nested into the national rollout of P4P in Rwanda. Treatment facilities were enrolled in the P4P scheme in 2006 and comparison facilities were enrolled two years later. The incentive effect is isolated from the resource effect by increasing comparison facilities' input-based budgets by the average P4P payments to the treatment facilities. The data were collected from 166 facilities and a random sample of 2158 households. P4P had a large and significant positive impact on institutional deliveries and preventive care visits by young children, and improved quality of prenatal care. The authors find no effect on the number of prenatal care visits or on immunization rates. P4P had the greatest effect on those services that had the highest payment rates and needed the lowest provider effort. P4P financial performance incentives can improve both the use of and the quality of health services. Because the analysis isolates the incentive effect from the resource effect in P4P, the results indicate that an equal amount of financial resources without the incentives would not have achieved the same gain in outcomes.

11 citations