Since the discovery of organic azides by Peter Griess more than 140 years ago, numerous syntheses of these energy-rich molecules have been developed. In more recent times in particular, completely new perspectives have been developed for their use in peptide chemistry, combinatorial chemistry, and heterocyclic synthesis. Organic azides have assumed an important position at the interface between chemistry, biology, medicine, and materials science. In this Review, the fundamental characteristics of azide chemistry and current developments are presented. The focus will be placed on cycloadditions (Huisgen reaction), aza ylide chemistry, and the synthesis of heterocycles. Further reactions such as the aza-Wittig reaction, the Sundberg rearrangement, the Staudinger ligation, the Boyer and Boyer-Aube rearrangements, the Curtius rearrangement, the Schmidt rearrangement, and the Hemetsberger rearrangement bear witness to the versatility of modern azide chemistry.

Organic Azides: An Exploding Diversity of a Unique Class of Compounds

▪ Abstract The neonicotinoids, the newest major class of insecticides, have outstanding potency and systemic action for crop protection against piercing-sucking pests, and they are highly effective for flea control on cats and dogs. Their common names are acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, thiacloprid, and thiamethoxam. They generally have low toxicity to mammals (acute and chronic), birds, and fish. Biotransformations involve some activation reactions but largely detoxification mechanisms. In contrast to nicotine, epibatidine, and other ammonium or iminium nicotinoids, which are mostly protonated at physiological pH, the neonicotinoids are not protonated and have an electronegative nitro or cyano pharmacophore. Agonist recognition by the nicotinic receptor involves cation-π interaction for nicotinoids in mammals and possibly a cationic subsite for interaction with the nitro or cyano substituent of neonicotinoids in insects. The low affinity of neonicotinoids for vertebrate ...

NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDE TOXICOLOGY: Mechanisms of Selective Action

Since their discovery in the late 1980s, neonicotinoid pesticides have become the most widely used class of insecticides worldwide, with large-scale applications ranging from plant protection (crops, vegetables, fruits), veterinary products, and biocides to invertebrate pest control in fish farming. In this review, we address the phenyl-pyrazole fipronil together with neonicotinoids because of similarities in their toxicity, physicochemical profiles, and presence in the environment. Neonicotinoids and fipronil currently account for approximately one third of the world insecticide market; the annual world production of the archetype neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, was estimated to be ca. 20,000 tonnes active substance in 2010. There were several reasons for the initial success of neonicotinoids and fipronil: (1) there was no known pesticide resistance in target pests, mainly because of their recent development, (2) their physicochemical properties included many advantages over previous generations of insecticides (i.e., organophosphates, carbamates, pyrethroids, etc.), and (3) they shared an assumed reduced operator and consumer risk. Due to their systemic nature, they are taken up by the roots or leaves and translocated to all parts of the plant, which, in turn, makes them effectively toxic to herbivorous insects. The toxicity persists for a variable period of time—depending on the plant, its growth stage, and the amount of pesticide applied. A wide variety of applications are available, including the most common prophylactic non-Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) application by seed coating. As a result of their extensive use and physicochemical properties, these substances can be found in all environmental compartments including soil, water, and air. Neonicotinoids and fipronil operate by disrupting neural transmission in the central nervous system of invertebrates. Neonicotinoids mimic the action of neurotransmitters, while fipronil inhibits neuronal receptors. In doing so, they continuously stimulate neurons leading ultimately to death of target invertebrates. Like virtually all insecticides, they can also have lethal and sublethal impacts on non-target organisms, including insect predators and vertebrates. Furthermore, a range of synergistic effects with other stressors have been documented. Here, we review extensively their metabolic pathways, showing how they form both compound-specific and common metabolites which can themselves be toxic. These may result in prolonged toxicity. Considering their wide commercial expansion, mode of action, the systemic properties in plants, persistence and environmental fate, coupled with limited information about the toxicity profiles of these compounds and their metabolites, neonicotinoids and fipronil may entail significant risks to the environment. A global evaluation of the potential collateral effects of their use is therefore timely. The present paper and subsequent chapters in this review of the global literature explore these risks and show a growing body of evidence that persistent, low concentrations of these insecticides pose serious risks of undesirable environmental impacts.

/pdf/systemic-insecticides-neonicotinoids-and-fipronil-trends-iqykc9qemm.pdf

Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites

https://www.boerenlandvogels.nl/sites/default/files/Morrissey%20et%20al_2015_Neonicotinoid%20contamination%20of%20global%20surface%20water%20%20%20.pdf

Neonicotinoid contamination of global surface waters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates: A review

■ Abstract Neonicotinoids, the most important new class of synthetic insecticides of the past three decades, are used to control sucking insects both on plants and on companion animals. Imidacloprid (the principal example), nitenpyram, acetamiprid, thiacloprid, thiamethoxam, and others act as agonists at the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). The botanical insecticide nicotine acts at the same target without the neonicotinoid level of effectiveness or safety. Fundamental differences between the nAChRs of insects and mammals confer remarkable selectivity for the neonicotinoids. Whereas ionized nicotine binds at an anionic subsite in the mammalian nAChR, the negatively tipped (“magic” nitro or cyano) neonicotinoids interact with a proposed unique subsite consisting of cationic amino acid residue(s) in the insect nAChR. Knowledge reviewed here of the functional architecture and molecular aspects of the insect and mammalian nAChRs and their neonicotinoid-binding site lays the foundation for continued development and use of this new class of safe and effective insecticides. CONTENTS

Selective toxicity of neonicotinoids attributable to specificity of insect and mammalian nicotinic receptors

The insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is a major target for insecticide action. The rapidly expanding use of neonicotinoid insecticides of varied structures makes it increasingly important to define similarities and differences in their action, particularly for the first-generation chloropyridinyl compounds versus the second-generation chlorothiazolyl derivatives. We have shown with Musca domestica that a convenient and relevant determination of the neonicotinoid insecticide target is a binding site assay with [(3)H]imidacloprid ([(3)H]IMI). This study uses membranes from the aphids MYZUS: persicae and Aphis craccivora and from heads of the flies Drosophila melanogaster and Musca domestica to characterize the [(3)H]IMI binding sites relative to their number and possible species variation in structure-activity relationships. With emphasis on commercial neonicotinoids, six potent chloropyridinyl compounds are compared with the corresponding six chlorothiazolyl analogues (syntheses are given for chemicals prepared differently than previously described). The preference for chloropyridinyl versus chlorothiazolyl is not dependent on the insect species examined but instead on other structural features of the molecule. The chlorothiazolyl substituent generally confers higher potency in the clothianidin and desmethylthiamethoxam series and the chloropyridinyl moiety in the imidacloprid, thiacloprid, acetamiprid, and nitenpyram series. Two chlorothiazolyl compounds compete directly with the chloropyridinyl [(3)H]IMI for the same binding sites in Myzus and Drosophila membranes. This study shows conserved neonicotinoid specificity of the [(3)H]IMI binding site in each of the four insect species examined.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.751294.x

Insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: conserved neonicotinoid specificity of [(3)H]imidacloprid binding site.

The 5-azido analogue of the major insecticide imidacloprid, 1-(5-azido-6-chloropyridin-3-ylmethyl)-2-nitroiminoimidaz olidine (1), and an acyclic analogue, N-(5-azido-6-chloropyridin-3-ylmethyl)-N'-methyl-N' '-nitroguanidine (2), were prepared in good yields as candidate photoaffinity probes for mammalian and insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) The essential intermediate was 5-azido-6-chloropyridin-3-ylmethyl chloride (3) prepared in two ways: from 6-chloro-5-nitronicotinic acid by selective reduction and then diazotization, and from N-(6-chloropyridin-3-ylmethyl)morpholine by an electrophilic azide introduction with lithium diisopropylamide followed by chlorine substitution of morpholine with ethyl chloroformate Coupling of 3 with 2-nitroiminoimidazolidine gave 1 Conversion of 3 to 2 was achieved in good yields via the hexahydrotriazine intermediate 14 Fortuitously, the azido substituent in 1 and 2 increases the affinity 7-79-fold for rat brain and recombinant alpha4beta2 nAChRs (K(i)s 44-60 nM competing with [(3)H](-)-nicotine) while maintaining high potency on both insect nAChRs (Drosophila and Myzus) (K(i)s 1-15 nM competing with [(3)H]imidacloprid) Azidopyridinyl compounds 1 and 2 are therefore candidate photoaffinity probes for characterization of both mammalian and insect receptors

Aiguo Zhang

Papers

Insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: conserved neonicotinoid specificity of [(3)H]imidacloprid binding site.

5-Azidoimidacloprid and an Acyclic Analogue as Candidate Photoaffinity Probes for Mammalian and Insect Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors