A
Alan Pearson
Researcher at University of Adelaide
Publications - 185
Citations - 6061
Alan Pearson is an academic researcher from University of Adelaide. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Nursing research. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 184 publications receiving 5109 citations. Previous affiliations of Alan Pearson include University of New England (Australia) & The Joanna Briggs Institute.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach
TL;DR: The development and use of the ConQual approach will assist users of qualitative systematic reviews to establish confidence in the evidence produced in these types of reviews and can serve as a practical tool to assist in decision making.
Journal ArticleDOI
The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI).
Zachary Munn,Edoardo Aromataris,Catalin Tufanaru,Cindy Stern,Kylie Porritt,James Farrow,Craig Lockwood,Matthew Stephenson,Sandeep Moola,Lucylynn Lizarondo,Alexandra McArthur,Micah D J Peters,Alan Pearson,Zoe Jordan +13 more
TL;DR: The new systematic review software, the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI), was successfully developed through an iterative process of development, feedback, testing and review.
Journal ArticleDOI
The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare.
Alan Pearson,Alan Pearson,Rick Wiechula,Rick Wiechula,Anthea Court,Anthea Court,Craig Lockwood,Craig Lockwood +7 more
TL;DR: A developmental framework of evidence-based practice is presented that builds and expands on the work of leaders in the field ofevidence-based healthcare; is contextualised; is inclusive of diverse forms of evidence; and incorporates understandings of knowledge transfer and utilisation.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Comparative Analysis of Three Online Appraisal Instruments’ Ability to Assess Validity in Qualitative Research
TL;DR: Comparing three online critical appraisal instruments’ ability to facilitate an assessment of validity found CASP appears to be less sensitive to aspects of validity than the evaluation tool for qualitative studies (ETQS) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Systematic Review: An Overview
Edoardo Aromataris,Alan Pearson +1 more
TL;DR: The purpose of the series is to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review-one step at a time, one that influences health care decisions.