scispace - formally typeset
A

Aleksey Tetenov

Researcher at University of Geneva

Publications -  20
Citations -  671

Aleksey Tetenov is an academic researcher from University of Geneva. The author has contributed to research in topics: Statistical hypothesis testing & Population. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 20 publications receiving 508 citations. Previous affiliations of Aleksey Tetenov include Collegio Carlo Alberto & University of Bristol.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Who should be treated? Empirical welfare maximization methods for treatment choice

TL;DR: The authors proposed the empirical welfare maximization (EWM) method, which estimates a treatment assignment policy by maximizing the sample analog of average social welfare over a class of candidate treatment policies, and provided an asymptotically valid inference procedure for the population welfare gain obtained by exercising the EWM rule.
ReportDOI

Who Should Be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice

Toru Kitagawa, +1 more
- 10 Mar 2015 - 
TL;DR: It is shown that when the propensity score is known, the average social welfare attained by EWM rules converges at least at n^(-1/2) rate to the maximum obtainable welfare uniformly over a minimally constrained class of data distributions, and this uniform convergence rate is minimax optimal.
Posted Content

Statistical Treatment Choice Based on Asymmetric Minimax Regret Criteria

TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of treatment choice between a status quo treatment with a known outcome distribution and an innovation whose outcomes are observed only in a representative finite sample was studied, and the authors derived exact finite sample solutions for experiments with normal, Bernoulli and bounded distributions of individual outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical treatment choice based on asymmetric minimax regret criteria

TL;DR: In this article, the problem of treatment choice between a status quo treatment with a known outcome distribution and an innovation whose outcomes are observed only in a finite sample is studied, where the regret is the expected welfare loss due to assigning inferior treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Admissible treatment rules for a risk-averse planner with experimental data on an innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider a planner choosing treatments for observationally identical persons who vary in their response to treatment, and assume that the objective is to maximize a concave-monotone function f( ·) of the success rate and show that admissibility depends on the curvature of f ( ·).