A
Aleksey Tetenov
Researcher at University of Geneva
Publications - 20
Citations - 671
Aleksey Tetenov is an academic researcher from University of Geneva. The author has contributed to research in topics: Statistical hypothesis testing & Population. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 20 publications receiving 508 citations. Previous affiliations of Aleksey Tetenov include Collegio Carlo Alberto & University of Bristol.
Papers
More filters
Posted Content
Who should be treated? Empirical welfare maximization methods for treatment choice
Toru Kitagawa,Aleksey Tetenov +1 more
TL;DR: The authors proposed the empirical welfare maximization (EWM) method, which estimates a treatment assignment policy by maximizing the sample analog of average social welfare over a class of candidate treatment policies, and provided an asymptotically valid inference procedure for the population welfare gain obtained by exercising the EWM rule.
ReportDOI
Who Should Be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice
Toru Kitagawa,Aleksey Tetenov +1 more
TL;DR: It is shown that when the propensity score is known, the average social welfare attained by EWM rules converges at least at n^(-1/2) rate to the maximum obtainable welfare uniformly over a minimally constrained class of data distributions, and this uniform convergence rate is minimax optimal.
Posted Content
Statistical Treatment Choice Based on Asymmetric Minimax Regret Criteria
TL;DR: In this paper, the problem of treatment choice between a status quo treatment with a known outcome distribution and an innovation whose outcomes are observed only in a representative finite sample was studied, and the authors derived exact finite sample solutions for experiments with normal, Bernoulli and bounded distributions of individual outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Statistical treatment choice based on asymmetric minimax regret criteria
TL;DR: In this article, the problem of treatment choice between a status quo treatment with a known outcome distribution and an innovation whose outcomes are observed only in a finite sample is studied, where the regret is the expected welfare loss due to assigning inferior treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI
Admissible treatment rules for a risk-averse planner with experimental data on an innovation
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider a planner choosing treatments for observationally identical persons who vary in their response to treatment, and assume that the objective is to maximize a concave-monotone function f( ·) of the success rate and show that admissibility depends on the curvature of f ( ·).