scispace - formally typeset
A

Ali Ahmadinia

Researcher at California State University San Marcos

Publications -  123
Citations -  2360

Ali Ahmadinia is an academic researcher from California State University San Marcos. The author has contributed to research in topics: System on a chip & Network on a chip. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 118 publications receiving 2169 citations. Previous affiliations of Ali Ahmadinia include University of Erlangen-Nuremberg & University of Edinburgh.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Evaluation of LoRa and LoRaWAN for wireless sensor networks

TL;DR: The results indicated that this technology can be a reliable link for low cost remote sensing applications.
Posted Content

DyNoC: A Dynamic Infrastructure for Communication in Dynamically Reconfigurable Devices

TL;DR: In this paper, a new paradigm to support the communication among modules dynamically placed on a reconfigurable device at run-time is presented, based on the network on chip (NoC) infrastructure.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

DyNoC: A dynamic infrastructure for communication in dynamically reconfugurable devices

TL;DR: A new paradigm to support the communication among modules dynamically placed on a reconfigurable device at run-time is presented and the unrestricted reachability of components and pins, the deadlock-freeness and the feasibility are proved.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Erlangen Slot Machine: A Dynamically Reconfigurable FPGA-based Computer

TL;DR: The development of a new FPGA-based reconfigurable computer called the Erlangen Slot Machine, which overcomes many architectural constraints of existing platforms and allows a user to partially reconfigure hardware modules arranged in so-called slots.
Journal ArticleDOI

Smart Random Neural Network Controller for HVAC Using Cloud Computing Technology

TL;DR: A model for the intelligent controller by integrating internet of things (IoT) with cloud computing and web services is proposed, and the results have shown that by embedding the intelligence in the base station and sensor nodes, the power consumption of the intelligent controllers was 4.4% less than Case 1 and 19.23% more than Case 2.