Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex disorder for which currently there is no accepted definition. Having a uniform standard for diagnosing and classifying AKI would enhance our ability to manage these patients. Future clinical and translational research in AKI will require collaborative networks of investigators drawn from various disciplines, dissemination of information via multidisciplinary joint conferences and publications, and improved translation of knowledge from pre-clinical research. We describe an initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI. Members representing key societies in critical care and nephrology along with additional experts in adult and pediatric AKI participated in a two day conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in September 2005 and were assigned to one of three workgroups. Each group's discussions formed the basis for draft recommendations that were later refined and improved during discussion with the larger group. Dissenting opinions were also noted. The final draft recommendations were circulated to all participants and subsequently agreed upon as the consensus recommendations for this report. Participating societies endorsed the recommendations and agreed to help disseminate the results. The term AKI is proposed to represent the entire spectrum of acute renal failure. Diagnostic criteria for AKI are proposed based on acute alterations in serum creatinine or urine output. A staging system for AKI which reflects quantitative changes in serum creatinine and urine output has been developed. We describe the formation of a multidisciplinary collaborative network focused on AKI. We have proposed uniform standards for diagnosing and classifying AKI which will need to be validated in future studies. The Acute Kidney Injury Network offers a mechanism for proceeding with efforts to improve patient outcomes.

Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an emerging cause of kidney transplant failure affecting 1-10% of patients. As uncertainty exists regarding risk factors, diagnosis, and intervention, an independent panel of experts reviewed the currently available evidence and prepared this report. Most cases of PVAN are elicited by BK virus (BKV) in the context of intense immunosuppression. No specific immunosuppressive drug is exclusively associated with PVAN, but most cases reported to date arise while the patient is on triple immunosuppressive combinations, often comprising tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil plus corticosteroids. Immunologic control of polyomavirus replication can be achieved by reducing, switching, and/or discontinuing components of the immunosuppressive regimen, but the individual's risk of rejection should be considered. The success rate of this intervention is increased with earlier diagnosis. Therefore, it is recommended that all renal transplant recipients should be screened for BKV replication in the urine: 1) every three months during the first two years posttransplant; 2) when allograft dysfunction is noted; and 3) when allograft biopsy is performed. A positive screening result should be confirmed in <4 weeks and assessed by quantitative assays (e.g. BKV DNA or RNA load in plasma or urine). Definitive diagnosis of PVAN requires allograft biopsy. If PVAN and concurrent acute rejection is diagnosed, antirejection treatment should be considered, coupled with subsequently reducing immunosuppression. The antiviral cidofovir is not approved for PVAN, but investigational use at low doses (0.25-0.33 mg/kg intravenously biweekly) without probenicid should be considered for refractory cases. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss to PVAN remains a treatment option for patients clearing polyomavirus replication.

Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation: Interdisciplinary Analyses and Recommendations

Hyponatraemia, defined as a serum sodium concentration !135 mmol/l, is the most common disorder of body fluid and electrolyte balance encountered in clinical practice. It can lead to a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, from subtle to severe or even life threatening, and is associated with increased mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients presenting with a range of conditions. Despite this, the management of patients remains problematic. The prevalence of hyponatraemia in widely different conditions and the fact that hyponatraemia is managed by clinicians with a broad variety of backgrounds have fostered diverse institution- and speciality-based approaches to diagnosis and treatment. To obtain a common and holistic view, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) and the European Renal Association – European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA–EDTA), represented by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP), have developed the Clinical Practice Guideline on the diagnostic approach and treatment of hyponatraemia as a joint venture of three societies representing specialists with a natural interest in hyponatraemia. In addition to a rigorous approach to methodology and evaluation, we were keen to ensure that the document focused on patient-important outcomes and included utility for clinicians involved in everyday practice.

/pdf/clinical-practice-guideline-on-diagnosis-and-treatment-of-509w3449ob.pdf

Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia

https://www.kidney-international.org/article/S0085-2538(15)52823-8/pdf

Association between obesity and kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This article updates the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2007 classification of advanced heart failure and describes new diagnostic and treatment options for these patients. Recognizing the patient with advanced heart failure is critical to facilitate timely referral to advanced heart failure centres. Unplanned visits for heart failure decompensation, malignant arrhythmias, co-morbidities, and the 2016 ESC guidelines criteria for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are included in this updated definition. Standard treatment is, by definition, insufficient in these patients. Inotropic therapy may be used as a bridge strategy, but it is only a palliative measure when used on its own, because of the lack of outcomes data. Major progress has occurred with short-term mechanical circulatory support devices for immediate management of cardiogenic shock and long-term mechanical circulatory support for either a bridge to transplantation or as destination therapy. Heart transplantation remains the treatment of choice for patients without contraindications. Some patients will not be candidates for advanced heart failure therapies. For these patients, who are often elderly with multiple co-morbidities, management of advanced heart failure to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life should be emphasized. Robust evidence from prospective studies is lacking for most therapies for advanced heart failure. There is an urgent need to develop evidence-based treatment algorithms to prolong life when possible and in accordance with patient preferences, increase life quality, and reduce the burden of hospitalization in this vulnerable patient population.

Advanced heart failure : a position statement of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Over the last decades, there have been major advancements in the field of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with utilization of newer technologies and advent of various modalities Once exclusively used for treatment of renal failure and its metabolic consequences, the science of RRT has expanded to include non-renal indications such as treatment of fluid overload in patients with refractory heart failure Hepatic encephalopathy due to sudden rise in serum ammonia level in the setting of acute liver failure represents an underexplored area in which RRT can potentially be helpful While the key role of hyperammonemia in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver failure is well established, emerging data points to distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying chronic alterations in neural metabolic functions and acute changes in cerebral perfusion In the acute setting, ammonia can cross the blood-brain barrier at high levels leading to sudden formation of strong osmolytes, significant transcellular shift of water, and cerebral edema Herein, we provide a brief overview of the role of RRT in management of acute hyperammonemia in the setting of acute liver failure and discuss the practical aspects of the available therapeutic modalities Larger studies are needed to shed light on a number of clinical aspects such as the impact on the outcomes, criteria for selection of the patients that would benefit most from this therapeutic approach, optimal timing of initiation of RRT, and the most appropriate modality

Expanding the Boundaries of Combined Renal Replacement Therapy for Non-Renal Indications.

The Congestion-Creatinine Interplay in Acute Heart Failure: Time to Move Up to the Next Level

Ureteral stent placement and BK virus allograft nephropathy in renal transplant recipients.

/pdf/pulmonary-arterial-hypertension-and-the-kidney-getting-to-2ytn54ekxg.pdf

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and the Kidney: Getting to the Heart of the Matter.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) might expect their nephrologists to coordinate all their healthcare needs We performed a survey among adult patients with ESKD undergoing HD in two outpatient dialysis centers at the University of Florida to identify differences in characteristics between patients with and without primary care providers (PCP) and to explore the association of PCP utilization with adherence to preventive health measures Of the 132 participants, 894% reported having a PCP This group was more likely to be female, older, and with higher education level Having a PCP was associated with influenza, pneumococcal, and tetanus/Tdap vaccinations as well as screening for tuberculosis, depression, hypertension, and dyslipidemia The PCP group had statistically significant higher rates of influenza immunization (898% vs 714%, P = 04) as well as screening for hypertension (932% vs 643%, P = 04) and depression (788% vs 429%, P = 004), compared to the group without PCP, in the multivariable analysis Having a PCP is associated with higher rates of influenza vaccination and screening for depression and hypertension These findings could have important implications as far as identifying patients with ESKD at risk for fragmented care and potential gaps in optimal preventive care

Amir Kazory

Papers

Expanding the Boundaries of Combined Renal Replacement Therapy for Non-Renal Indications.

The Congestion-Creatinine Interplay in Acute Heart Failure: Time to Move Up to the Next Level

Ureteral stent placement and BK virus allograft nephropathy in renal transplant recipients.

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and the Kidney: Getting to the Heart of the Matter.

Preventive care for patients with end-stage kidney disease: crossroads between nephrology and primary care.