scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Andrea Decensi published in 1992"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The preliminary data suggest that 4‐HPR may affect theDNA content and abnormal cytology in patients with previously resected superficial bladder cancer.
Abstract: The ability of the synthetic retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR) to affect the outcome of previously resected superficial bladder cancer was investigated in a pilot study using DNA content flow cytometry and conventional cytology as intermediate endpoints. Twelve patients were treated with oral 4-HPR (200 mg daily) and compared with 17 non-randomized, untreated controls. The median interval between transurethral resection and 4-HPR administration was 5.5 months (range 0-36). The median follow-up period was 12 months (range 3-31) in the 4-HPR group and 9 months (range 2-22) in the control group. The proportion of patients with DNA aneuploid stemlines in bladder-washed cells decreased from 7/12 (58%) to 5/11 (45%) in the 4-HPR group, but increased from 7/17 (41%) to 10/17 (59%) in the control group. In patients with stable diploid profiles, mean (+/- SE) S-phase and G2+M-phase fractions decreased in the course of retinoid treatment from basal levels of 15.2 +/- 4.1% to 7.5 +/- 3.3% and 10.3 +/- 2.2% to 5.2 +/- 0.4%, respectively. The same parameters in the control group changed from basal levels of 14.6 +/- 3.4% to 12.4 +/- 2.7% and 9.8 +/- 1.6% to 12.6 +/- 1.6%, respectively. Positive or suspicious cytologic examinations were present in 3/12 (25%) treated cases prior to 4-HPR administration and all subsequently reverted to normal. The same parameter in the control group increased from 4/17 (24%) to 6/17 (35%) during follow-up. Impaired adaptation to darkness was recorded in 4 patients, and transient dermatologic alterations were observed in one-third of the patients, requiring dose reduction in one case.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

23 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
30 Apr 1992-Tumori
TL;DR: This therapeutic approach with lonidamine is not active in hormone-refractory prostatic cancer patients with distant metastasis, and it is concluded that these patients with metastatic prostate cancer who had become refractory to hormonal therapies are not treated with this approach.
Abstract: Twenty-one patients with metastatic prostate cancer who had become refractory to hormonal therapies received lonidamine (150 mg tid and 600 mg daily dose in 17 and 4 patients, respectively). In all but 4 patients, treatment was continued until disease progression or the development of severe toxicity. Toxicity was minimal and reversible (score 1 or 2) and included myalgia (8 cases), arthralgia (6 cases), gastrointestinal toxicity (11 cases), fatigue (14 cases) and testicular pain (9 cases). The response was evaluated after at least one month of therapy with lonidamine, according to NPCP-USA recommendations. Of 21 patients who entered the study, only 15 were evaluable for response; 2 died (1 for severe toxicity and 1 for drug-unrelated reasons). No objective response was obtained in the series. In fact, only 6 patients achieved stable disease and 9 progressed. Median survival time from the beginning of treatment was no longer than that of patients in a similar condition who were treated with standard palliative maneuvers. We conclude that this therapeutic approach with lonidamine is not active in hormone-refractory prostatic cancer patients with distant metastasis.

5 citations