Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey

Purpose
The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among radiation oncology patients, the coping strategies that influenced this use, and the rates of disclosure of CAM use to their healthcare providers.

Complementary and alternative medicine: use and disclosure in radiation oncology community practice

Objective: To investigate the use of and expenditure on 17 of the most popular forms of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by adult Australians, sociodemographic characteristics of CAM users, and communication between CAM users and their doctors. Methods: In May–June 2005, a sample of 1067 adults, 18 years and older, from all Australian states and territories, was recruited by random-digit telephone dialing and interviewed about their CAM use in the previous 12 months. Results: In the 12-month period, 68.9% (95% CI: 66.1%–71.7%) of those interviewed used at least one of the 17 forms of CAM and 44.1% (95% confidence interval: 41.1%–47.1%) visited a CAM practitioner. The estimated number of visits to CAM practitioners by adult Australians in the 12-month period (69.2 million) was almost identical to the estimated number of visits to medical practitioners (69.3 million). The annual “out of pocket” expenditure on CAM, nationally, was estimated as 4.13 billion Australian dollars (US $3.12 billion). L...

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Australia: A National Population-Based Survey

Background. No comprehensive systematic review has been published since 1998 about the frequency with which cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Methods. MEDLINE, AMED, and Embase databases were searched for surveys published until January 2009. Surveys conducted in Australia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, and the United States with at least 100 adult cancer patients were included. Detailed information on methods and results was independently extracted by 2 reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using a criteria list developed according to the STROBE guideline. Exploratory random effects metaanalysis and metaregression were applied. Results. Studies from 18 countries (152; >65 000 cancer patients) were included. Heterogeneity of CAM use was high and to some extent explained by differences in survey methods. The combined prevalence for “current use” of CAM across all studies was 40%. The highest was in the United States and the lowest in Italy and the Netherlands. Metaanalysis suggested an increase in CAM use from an estimated 25% in the 1970s and 1980s to more than 32% in the 1990s and to 49% after 2000. Conclusions. The overall prevalence of CAM use found was lower than often claimed. However, there was some evidence that the use has increased considerably over the past years. Therefore, the health care systems ought to implement clear strategies of how to deal with this. To improve the validity and reporting of future surveys, the authors suggest criteria for methodological quality that should be fulfilled and reporting standards that should be required.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1534735411423920

How Many Cancer Patients Use Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

In 2010, approximately 222,520 new cases of lung or bronchial cancer will be diagnosed in the USA, and 157,300 patients are expected to die of this disease [1]. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 80 % of these cases. Lung cancer is most often asymptomatic in its early stages; consequently, the disease is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, when it is much more difficult to treat. One or more genes are believed to be responsible for an inherited increase in risk of developing lung cancer in the general population. Smoking remains one of the main environmental factors associated with the development of lung cancer [2]. Although the development of lung cancer seems to be the result of several sequential molecular abnormalities in individuals at high risk of developing the disease, the genetic mechanisms by which an individual develops lung cancer remain largely unknown. These steps involve abnormalities in the expression of angiogenic factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor, or VEGF and epithelial growth factor receptors, or EGFRs) [3]. The heterogeneity of lung cancer and the diversity of its morphologic appearance and molecular properties make the application of molecular targeted therapies used in other cancers more complex, but such therapies are certainly a goal for the future.

Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE: Oncologists are aware that their patients use complementary/alternative medicine (CAM). As cancer incidence rates and survival time increase, use of CAM will likely increase. This study assessed the prevalence and predictors of CAM use in a comprehensive cancer center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects were English-speaking cancer patients at least 18 years of age, attending one of eight outpatient clinics at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, between December 1997 and June 1998. After giving written informed consent, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. Differences between CAM users and nonusers were assessed by χ2 and univariate logistic regression analysis. A multivariate logistic regression model identified the simultaneous impact of demographic, clinical, and treatment variables on CAM use; P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Of the 453 participants (response rate, 51.4%), 99.3% had heard of CAM. Of those, 83.3% had used at least one CAM approac...

Complementary/Alternative Medicine Use in a Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Implications for Oncology

51.4%), 99.3% had heard of CAM. Of those, 83.3% had used at least one CAM approach. Use was greatest for spiritual practices (80.5%), vitamins and herbs (62.6%), and movement and physical therapies (59.2%) and predicted (P < .001) by sex (female), younger age, indigent pay status, and surgery. After excluding spiritual practices and psychotherapy, 95.8% of participants were aware of CAM and 68.7% of those had used CAM. Use was predicted (P < .0001) by sex (female), education, and chemotherapy. Conclusion: In most categories, CAM use was common among outpatients. Given the number of patients combining vitamins and herbs with conventional treatments, the oncology community must improve patientprovider communication, offer reliable information to patients, and initiate research to determine possible drug-herb-vitamin interactions. J Clin Oncol 18:2505-2514. © 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Anthony Greisinger

Papers

Complementary/Alternative Medicine Use in a Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Implications for Oncology

Complementary/Al ternative M edicine U se i n a Comprehensive C ancer C enter a nd t he I mplications for O ncology