Comparison between handgrip strength subjective global assessment and prognostic nutritional index in assessing malnutrition and predicting clinical outcome in cirrhotic outpatients.

Body composition, muscle function, and energy expenditure in patients with liver cirrhosis: a comprehensive study

Cirrhosis is the consequence of progression of many forms of necro-inflammatory disorders of the liver with hepatic fibrosis, hepatocellular dysfunction, and vascular remodeling. Reversing the primary hepatic disorder, liver transplantation, and controlling the complications are the major management goals. Since the former options are not available to the majority of cirrhotics, treating complications remains the mainstay of therapy. Sarcopenia and/or cachexia is the most common complication and adversely affects survival, quality of life, development of other complications of cirrhosis, and outcome after liver transplantation. With the increase in number of cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the number of patients waiting for a liver transplantation is likely to continue to increase above the currently estimated 72.3/100,000 population. One of the critical clinical questions is to determine if we can treat sarcopenia of cirrhosis without transplantation. No effective therapies exist to treat sarcopenia because the mechanism(s) of sarcopenia in cirrhosis is as yet unknown. The reasons for this include the predominantly descriptive studies to date and the advances in our understanding of skeletal muscle biology and molecular regulation of atrophy and hypertrophy not being translated into the clinical practice of hepatology. Satellite cell biology, muscle autophagy and apoptosis, and molecular signaling abnormalities in the skeletal muscle of cirrhotics are also not known. Aging of the cirrhotic and transplanted population, use of mTOR inhibitors, and the lack of definitive outcome measures to define sarcopenia and cachexia in this population add to the difficulty in increasing our understanding of hepatic sarcopenia/cachexia and developing treatment options. Recent data on the role of myostatin, AMP kinase, impaired mTOR signaling resulting in anabolic resistance in animal models, and the rapidly developing field of nutriceuticals as signaling molecules need to be evaluated in human cirrhotics. Finally, the benefits of exercise reported in other disease states with sarcopenia may not be safe in cirrhotics due to the risk of gastrointestinal variceal bleeding due to an increase in portal pressure. This article focuses on the problems facing both muscle biologists and hepatologists in developing a comprehensive approach to sarcopenia in cirrhosis.

/pdf/consilience-in-sarcopenia-of-cirrhosis-ylwn7gctqx.pdf

Consilience in sarcopenia of cirrhosis

Malnutrition in Cirrhosis: Contribution and Consequences of Sarcopenia on Metabolic and Clinical Responses

Background and Objective: Liver cirrhosis is characterized by a decrease in functional hepatocytes, lowered circulating levels of plasma proteins and alterations in blood flow due to the development of portacaval shunts. Depending on the interplay between these parameters and the characteristics of an administered drug, varying degrees of impaired systemic clearance and first-pass metabolism are anticipated. The Simcyp Population-based ADME Simulator has already been used successfully to incorporate genetic, physiological and demographic attributes of certain subgroups within healthy populations into in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) of xenobiotic clearance. The objective of this study was to extend population models to predict systemic and oral drug clearance in relation to the severity of liver cirrhosis. Methods: Information on demographics, changes in hepatic blood flow, cytochrome P450 enzymes, liver size, plasma protein binding and renal function was incorporated into three separate population libraries. The latter corresponded to Child-Pugh were used to predict tscores A (mild), B (moderate) and C (severe) liver cirrhosis. These libraries, together with mechanistic IVIVE within the Simcyp Simulator, he clearance of intravenous and oral midazolam, oral caffeine, intravenous and oral theophylline, intravenous and oral metoprolol, oral nifedipine, oral quinidine, oral diclofenac, oral sildenafil, and intravenous and oral omeprazole. The simulated patients matched the clinical studies as closely as possible with regard to demographics and Child-Pugh scores. Predicted clearance values in both healthy control and liver cirrhosis populations were compared with observed values, as were the fold increases in clearance values between these populations. Results: There was good agreement (lack of statistically significant difference, two-tailed paired t-test) between observed and predicted clearance ratios, with the exception of those for two studies of intravenous omeprazole. Predicted clearance ratios were within 0.8- to 1.25-fold of observed ratios in 65% of cases (range 0.34- to 2.5-fold). Conclusion: The various drugs that were studied showed different changes in clearance in relation to disease severity, and a ‘one size fits all’ solution does not exist without considering the multiple sources of the changes. Predictions of the effects of liver cirrhosis on drug clearance are of potential value in the design of clinical studies during drug development and, clinically, in the assessment of likely dosage adjustment.

Aphasnee Sobhonslidsuk

Papers

Nutritional assessment in various stages of liver cirrhosis.