scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Arlen D. Hanssen published in 1998"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that a surgical site infection not involving the joint prosthesis, an NNIS System surgical patient risk index score of 1 or 2, the presence of a malignancy, and a history of a joint arthroplasty are associated with an increased risk of prosthetic joint infection.
Abstract: We conducted a matched case-control study to determine risk factors for the development of prosthetic joint infection. Cases were patients with prosthetic hip or knee joint infection. Controls were patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty and did not develop prosthetic joint infection. A multiple logistic regression model indicated that risk factors for prosthetic joint infection were the development of a surgical site infection not involving the prosthesis (odds ratio [OR], 35.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-154.6), a National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System surgical patient risk index score of 1 (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3) or 2 (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.0-7.5), the presence of a malignancy (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.2), and a history of joint arthroplasty (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-3.0). Our findings suggest that a surgical site infection not involving the joint prosthesis, an NNIS System surgical patient risk index score of 1 or 2, the presence of a malignancy, and a history of a joint arthroplasty are associated with an increased risk of prosthetic joint infection.

798 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Infection following total joint replacement remains a major problem that has not been solved during the last thirty years and factors leading to deep infection must be considered with respect to the host, wound, operative technique, operating-room environment, and microbiological characteristics of the infecting organisms.
Abstract: Infection following total joint replacement remains a major problem that has not been solved during the last thirty years. The prevalence of infection at the Mayo Clinic between 1969 and 1996 was 1.7 per cent of 30,680 total hip arthroplasties and 2.5 per cent of 18,749 total knee arthroplasties. After primary operations, the rate of infection was 1.3 per cent of 23,519 hips and 2.0 per cent of 16,035 knees. After revision operations, the rate was 3.2 per cent of 7161 hips and 5.6 per cent of 2714 knees (Table I). The rate of infection has been remarkably constant despite the use of different regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis, operating-room configurations, operative techniques, and modes of fixation of the implant. Factors leading to deep infection must be considered with respect to the host, wound, operative technique, operating-room environment, and microbiological characteristics of the infecting organisms. A prompt diagnosis of infection will facilitate treatment and minimize morbidity. View this table: TABLE I PREVALENCE OF INFECTION AFTER TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE YEARS 1969 THROUGH 1996 As stated, in discussing the etiology of infection, the host, wound, operating-room environment, operative technique, and microbiological characteristics of the infecting organisms must be considered. The patient as host is an important risk factor for infection. The operative wound is contaminated to some extent in all procedures, but the immune-defense mechanisms of the host prevent infection in most instances. Immunocompromised patients are clearly at increased risk for deep infection as are patients who have rheumatoid arthritis110,140. In a series of 4171 total knee replacements, an infection developed after sixteen (0.9 per cent) of 1854 replacements in patients who had osteoarthrosis compared with forty-five (2.2 per cent) of 2076 replacements in those who had rheumatoid arthritis140. In a series of 4240 total hip, knee, and …

456 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Débridement with retention of the prosthesis is a potentially successful treatment for early postoperative infection or acute hematogenous infection, provided that it is performed in the first two weeks after the onset of symptoms and that the prostheses previously had been functioning well.
Abstract: Forty-two patients (forty-two hips) who had an infection following a hip arthroplasty were managed with open debridement, retention of the prosthetic components, and antibiotic therapy. After a mean duration of follow-up of 6.3 years (range, 0.14 to twenty-two years), only six patients (14 per cent) -- four of nineteen who had had an early postoperative infection and two of four who had had an acute hematogenous infection -- had been managed successfully. Of the remaining thirty-six patients, three (7 per cent of the entire group) were being managed with chronic suppression with oral administration of antibiotics and thirty-three (79 per cent of the entire group) had had a failure of treatment. All nineteen patients who had a late chronic infection were deemed to have had a failure of treatment. Debridement had been performed at a mean of six days (range, two to fourteen days) after the onset of symptoms in the patients who had been managed successfully and at a mean of twenty-three days (range, three to ninety-three days) in those for whom treatment had failed. Debridement with retention of the prosthesis is a potentially successful treatment for early postoperative infection or acute hematogenous infection, provided that it is performed in the first two weeks after the onset of symptoms and that the prosthesis previously had been functioning well. In our experience, this procedure has not been successful when it has been performed more than two weeks after the onset of symptoms. Retention of the prosthesis should not be attempted in patients who have a chronic infection at the site of a hip arthroplasty as this approach universally fails.

304 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A revision operation that focuses on balancing the flexion and extension spaces, in conjunction with a posterior stabilized knee implant, seems to be a reliable treatment for symptomatic flexion instability after posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Abstract: Between 1990 and 1995, 25 painful primary posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasties were revised for flexion instability. These patients shared typical clinical presentations that included a sense of instability without frank giving way, recurrent knee joint effusion, soft tissue tenderness involving the pes anserine tendons and the retinacular tissue, posterior instability of 2+ or 3+ with a posterior drawer or a posterior sag sign at 90° flexion, and above average motion of their total knee arthroplasty. The primary total knee arthroplasty was performed for osteoarthritis in 23 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in two patients. There were 13 male and 12 female patients and their mean age was 65 years (range, 35-77 years). Before the revision operation, Knee Society knee scores averaged 45 points (range, 17-68 points) and function scores averaged 42 points (range, 0-60 points). Twenty-two of the knee replacements were revised to posterior stabilized implants and three underwent tibial polyethylene liner exchange only. Nineteen of the 22 knee replacements revised to a posterior stabilized implant were improved markedly after the revision surgery. Only one of three knee replacements that underwent tibial polyethylene exchange was improved. After the revision for flexion instability, Knee Society knee scores averaged 90 points (range, 82-99 points) and function scores averaged 75 points (range, 45-100 points) for the 20 knees with a successful outcome. This study suggests that flexion instability can be a cause of persistent pain and functional impairment after posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty. A revision operation that focuses on balancing the flexion and extension spaces, in conjunction with a posterior stabilized knee implant, seems to be a reliable treatment for symptomatic flexion instahility after posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

287 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Initial cup placement medial to the approximate femoral head center was predictive of successful long term acetabular component fixation and the method of acetABular reconstruction did not affect eventual cup loosening.
Abstract: From 1969 through 1980, 90 hips in 82 patients had cemented total hip arthroplasty for Type III developmental hip dysplasia. Seventy hips were reviewed at an average of 16.6 years (range, 5-23 years) after operation. Aseptic loosening developed in 53% of acetabular cups and 40% of femoral stems. Despite attempts to place acetabular components in the anatomic center, 18 cups (25.7%) were placed outside that area. Using a measurement method to determine the true acetabular region and approximate femoral head center, final acetabular loosening strongly correlated with initial cup placement. Loosening occurred in 15 of 18 cups (83.3%) initially positioned outside of the true acetabular region compared with loosening in 22 of 52 cups (42.3%) initially positioned within the true acetabular region. Acetabular loosening also correlated with initial lateral displacement or initial superior displacement of the hip center from the approximate femoral head center. Initial cup placement medial to the approximate femoral head center was predictive of successful long term acetabular component fixation. The method of acetabular reconstruction did not affect eventual cup loosening. Placement of the hip arthroplasty center of rotation in or near the true acetabular region is recommended.

119 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: To decrease the risk of reactivation of infection after prosthesis implantation in patients with quiescent tuberculous septic arthritis who have not received prior antituberculous therapy, consideration should be given to preoperative or perioperative antitubculous prophylaxis.
Abstract: Prosthetic joint replacement is being performed more frequently for patients with prior septic arthritis due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Prosthetic joint infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis does occur, but is rare. We report the clinical characteristics and outcome of seven cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis prosthetic joint infection seen at our institution over a 22-year period and summarize the English-language literature regarding current prophylaxis and treatment strategies. Tuberculous prosthetic joint infection most often represents reactivation of prior tuberculous septic arthritis. The diagnosis of tuberculous prosthetic joint disease is often delayed, because a history of prior Mycobacterium tuberculosis septic arthritis is not known. Treatment of tuberculous prosthetic joint infection requires a combined medical and surgical approach. Removal of the prosthesis has been the traditional surgical modality, followed by appropriate antituberculous therapy, but other surgical methods have been used successfully in selected cases. To decrease the risk of reactivation of infection after prosthesis implantation in patients with quiescent tuberculous septic arthritis who have not received prior antituberculous therapy, consideration should be given to preoperative or perioperative antituberculous prophylaxis.

81 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: It is proposed that the presence of metal-backed patellar failure represents a "prosthesis at risk" for the development of late prosthetic infection in patients implanted with primary total knee arthroplasty.
Abstract: Between 1985 and 1987, 1837 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses were implanted in 1503 patients. Group I included 843 knee with metal-backed patellar components (MBPC), and group II included 994 knees with all polyethylene patellar components (APPC). Follow-up averaged 5.7 years (range, 2 to 11 years). Twenty-four MBPC (2.9%) and 16 APPC TKA cases (1.6%) developed deep infection. In the time interval between arthroplasty and 2-year follow-up, eight MBPC and 11 APPC knees developed deep periprosthetic infection. The difference in the cumulative probability of infection between the two groups during this time interval was not significant (relative risk, 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-2.1; P = 0.73). However, after the 2-year follow-up, 16 MBPC and 5 APPC knees developed late infection, and the difference in the cumulative probability of infection between the MBPC and APPC knees during this time interval was significant (relative risk, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-8.5; P = 0.02). Although the mechanism for this increased risk of these late infections is not well understood, the attendant synovitis, effusion, and relative hyperemia of these knees in the presence of the particulate metal and polyethylene debris may increase the potential of bacterial seeding to these prostheses. Particulate metal debris has been previously shown to suppress bacterial phagocytosis and may play a role in the pathogenesis of these infections. We propose that the presence of metal-backed patellar failure represents a "prosthesis at risk" for the development of late prosthetic infection.

32 citations