A
Arthur C. Graesser
Researcher at University of Memphis
Publications - 623
Citations - 41856
Arthur C. Graesser is an academic researcher from University of Memphis. The author has contributed to research in topics: Intelligent tutoring system & Reading (process). The author has an hindex of 95, co-authored 614 publications receiving 38549 citations. Previous affiliations of Arthur C. Graesser include University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign & University of California.
Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Is it an Agent, or Just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents
Stan Franklin,Arthur C. Graesser +1 more
TL;DR: This work proposes a formal definition of an autonomous agent which clearly distinguishes a software agent from just any program, and offers the beginnings of a natural kinds taxonomy of autonomous agents.
Journal ArticleDOI
Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.
TL;DR: The authors describe a constructionist theory that accounts for the knowledge-based inferences that are constructed when readers comprehend narrative text, and present empirical evidence that addresses this theory and contrasts it with alternative theoretical frameworks.
Journal ArticleDOI
Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language
TL;DR: Standard text readability formulas scale texts on difficulty by relying on word length and sentence length, whereas Coh-Metrix is sensitive to cohesion relations, world knowledge, and language and discourse characteristics.
BookDOI
Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
TL;DR: In this article, T.O. Nelson et al. link Metacognitive Theory to Education by linking Metacognition to education and show that it can be used to support monitoring, reflection, and revision.
Journal ArticleDOI
Question Asking During Tutoring
TL;DR: The authors investigated the questions asked in tutoring sessions on research methods (college students) and algebra (7th graders) and found that student questions were approximately 240 times more frequent in tutor settings as classroom settings, whereas teacher questions were only slightly more frequent than teacher questions.