Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer management in middle-resource countries (MRCs): Consensus statement from the Breast Health Global Initiative

Discordances in ER, PR and HER2 receptors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Recent reports suggest increase in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) negative breast cancer yet little is known about histology or receptor status of breast cancer in Indian/Pakistani women.in the U.S. We examined the United States National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer program to assess: a) frequency of breast cancer by age, b) histologic subtypes, c) receptor status of breast cancer and, d) survival in Indians/Pakistanis compared to Caucasians. There were 360,933 breast cancer cases diagnosed 1988-2006. Chi-Square analyses and Cox proportional hazards models, to estimate relative risks for breast cancer mortality after adjusting for confounders, were performed using Statistical Analysis Software 9.2. Among Asian Indian/Pakistani breast cancer patients, 16.2% were < 40 yrs. old compared to 6.23% in Caucasians (p < 0.0001). Asian Indian women had more invasive ductal carcinoma (69.1 vs. 65.7%, p < 0.0001), inflammatory cancer (1.4% vs. 0.8, p < 0.0001) and less invasive lobular carcinoma (4.2% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.0001) than Caucasians. Asian Indian/Pakistani women had more ER/PR negative breast cancer (30.6% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.0095) than Caucasians. Adjusting for stage at diagnosis, age, tumor grade, nodal status, and histology, Asian Indian/Pakistani women's survival was similar to Caucasians, while African Americans' was worse. Asian Indian/Pakistani women have higher frequency of breast cancer (particularly in age < 40), ER/PR negative invasive ductal and inflammatory cancer than Caucasians.

/pdf/breast-cancer-histology-and-receptor-status-characterization-1nwbqwzx0g.pdf

Breast cancer histology and receptor status characterization in Asian Indian and Pakistani women in the U.S. - a SEER analysis

Aims: 1) To evaluate the estrogen receptor(ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Her-2 /neu expression in invasive breast carcinomas by immunohistochemistry and 2) to compare the pattern of expression with clinicopathological parameters like patient’s age, tumor size, mitotic index, histological type and grade and lymph node metastasis. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 321 female invasive breast carcinomas diagnosed in the Department of Histopathology, Apollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai from January 2009 to June 2010. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 24 to 99 years, with a mean of 53.8, and the majority of the tumors were T2 (83.8% in range of 2-5 cms), predominantly histological grade 2 (57.3%), followed by grade 3 (33.3%). ER, PR and Her-2/neu expression was seen in 59, 51 and 27% of cases respectively. Triple-negative breast cancers constituted 25 % of our cases. We also found characteristic associations between hormonal receptor and Her-2/ neu expression and various clinico-pathological parameters. Conclusions: The hormonal receptor expression appears to be lower in the Indian population compared to the West. A significant proportion of tumors in our study with Her2/neu overexpression also showed ER and PR positivity. Triple-negative breast tumors were most commonly grade 3, in women aged more than 50 years.

/pdf/immunohistochemical-profile-of-breast-cancer-patients-at-a-5azexbnj87.pdf

Immunohistochemical Profile of Breast Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India

This study was carried out to observe the trend in hormone receptors over the last 8 years in a tertiary cancer center in India. A total of 11,780 tumors analyzed for hormone receptors over the last 7 years were compared with the results of hormone receptor expression in a prior published study on 798 cases of breast cancer from the same institute. The patient's ages ranged from 18 to 102 years, Sixty percent of the patients were in the age group of 31-50 years. Seventy percent of the tumors were grade III tumors. The percentage of hormone receptor expression in breast cancer in the last 8 years varied from 52 to 57%. The overall receptor expression in the last 8 years shifted within a 5% range, confirming that the hormone receptor expression in Indian patients with breast cancer is low. However, there was redistribution within the pattern of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression among tumors showing hormone receptor expression. Breast cancers showing only PR expression reduced dramatically from 21% in the year 1999 to in the year 2006, with a parallel increase in breast cancers showing combined ER and PR positivity (from 25 to 41.8%) and only ER expression (from 7.4 to 10.6%). The hormone receptor expression in breast cancers in India is and continues to be low but the high incidence of only PR-positive tumors in our population reported earlier was misrepresented.

Hormone receptors over the last 8 years in a cancer referral center in India: What was and what is?

There is insurgence of literature evaluating prognostic and predictive factors in breast carcinomas treated with chemotherapy, with a parallel need to develop guidelines for the pathologist interpreting such excisions. Prechemotherapy gun biopsy and postchemotherapy excision specimens from 78 women with locally advanced breast cancer were analyzed for histological changes in the tumor, changes in the tumor grade, hormone receptors, cerb2, and bcl2 and their impact on disease-free survival (DFS). An unusually prominent granulomatous response to tumor was seen in three cases. The tumor grade changed in five patients, estrogen receptor (ER) expression was altered in 10 cases, progesterone receptor detection changed in 16 cases, cerb2 in one case and bcl2 in 16 cases. Fixation of the gun biopsy in Bouin's fluid and severe damage of nuclei after chemotherapy were the reasons for shift in the expression of hormone receptors. A low-grade tumor was associated with better response to chemotherapy. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis the ER expression and a low-grade tumor (grade I and II) significantly affected DFS. None of the factors evaluated impacted the overall survival of patients. To conclude there is a change in the tumor grade, bcl2, cerb2 and hormone receptors after chemotherapy. A pathologist interpreting specimens of breast cancer after chemotherapy must always record the postchemotherapy grade as it is an indicator of better response to chemotherapy and survival.

Atin Agrawal

Papers

Hormone receptors over the last 8 years in a cancer referral center in India: What was and what is?

Changes in the tumor grade and biological markers in locally advanced breast cancer after chemotherapy--implications for a pathologist.