ContextAntioxidant supplements are used for prevention of several diseases.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of antioxidant supplements on mortality in randomized primary and secondary prevention trials.Data Sources and Trial SelectionWe searched electronic databases and bibliographies published by October 2005. All randomized trials involving adults comparing beta carotene, vitamin A, vitamin C (ascorbic acid), vitamin E, and selenium either singly or combined vs placebo or vs no intervention were included in our analysis. Randomization, blinding, and follow-up were considered markers of bias in the included trials. The effect of antioxidant supplements on all-cause mortality was analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses and reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression was used to assess the effect of covariates across the trials.Data ExtractionWe included 68 randomized trials with 232 606 participants (385 publications).Data SynthesisWhen all low- and high-bias risk trials of antioxidant supplements were pooled together there was no significant effect on mortality (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98-1.06). Multivariate meta-regression analyses showed that low-bias risk trials (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.29) and selenium (RR, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.997-0.9995) were significantly associated with mortality. In 47 low-bias trials with 180 938 participants, the antioxidant supplements significantly increased mortality (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08). In low-bias risk trials, after exclusion of selenium trials, beta carotene (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11), vitamin A (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.24), and vitamin E (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07), singly or combined, significantly increased mortality. Vitamin C and selenium had no significant effect on mortality.ConclusionsTreatment with beta carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E may increase mortality. The potential roles of vitamin C and selenium on mortality need further study.

/pdf/mortality-in-randomized-trials-of-antioxidant-supplements-kzu0xla57m.pdf

Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this evidence summary is to provide the best available information on the effect of anti-oxidants on mortality in patients with various diseases.

/pdf/antioxidant-supplements-for-prevention-of-mortality-in-4y5qa95qy1.pdf

Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases

BACKGROUND: Riluzole 100 mg probably prolongs survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by about two months and the safety of the drug is not a major concern. The evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates that patients taking riluzole probably survive longer than patients taking placebo. The beneficial effects are very modest and the drug is expensive. Adverse effects from riluzole are relatively minor and for the most part reversible after stopping the drug. Riluzole has been approved for treatment of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in many countries but not all. Questions persist about its clinical utility because of high cost, modest efficacy and concern over adverse effects.OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of riluzole in prolonging survival, and in delaying the use of surrogates (tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation) to sustain survival.SEARCH STRATEGY: Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Register for randomized trials and enquiry from authors ...

/pdf/riluzole-for-amyotrophic-lateral-sclerosis-als-motor-neuron-2fa0w5rpzx.pdf

Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND)

Background
Riluzole has been approved for treatment of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in many countries but not all. Questions persist about its clinical utility because of high cost, modest efficacy and concern over adverse effects.

Objectives
To examine the efficacy of riluzole in prolonging survival, and in delaying the use of surrogates (tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation) to sustain survival.

Search strategy
Search of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Register for randomized trials and enquiry from authors of trials, Aventis (manufacturer of riluzole) and other experts in the field. The most recent search was November 2002.

Selection criteria
Types of studies: randomized trials
Types of participants: adults with a diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Types of interventions: treatment with riluzole or placebo
Types of outcome measures:
Primary: pooled hazard ratio of tracheostomy-free survival over all time points with riluzole 100 mg.
Secondary: per cent mortality as a function of time with riluzole 100 mg and other doses of riluzole; neurologic function, quality of life, muscle strength and adverse events.

Data collection and analysis
We identified four eligible randomized trials. Each reviewer graded them for methodological quality. Data extraction was performed by a single reviewer and checked by two others. We obtained some missing data from investigators and regulatory agencies. We performed meta-analyses with Review Manager 4.1 software using a fixed effects model. A test of drug efficacy was based on the Parmar pooled hazard ratio.

Main results
The three trials examining tracheostomy-free survival included a total of 876 riluzole treated patients and 406 placebo treated patients. The data for tracheostomy-free survival was not available from the fourth trial. The methodological quality was acceptable and the three trials were easily comparable, although one trial included older patients in more advanced stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Riluzole 100 mg per day provided a benefit for the homogeneous group of patients in the first two trials (p = 0.039, hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.99) and there was no evidence of heterogeneity (p = 0.33). When the third trial (which included older and more seriously affected patients) is added, there is evidence of heterogeneity (p<0.0001) and the random effects model, which takes this into account results in the overall treatment effect estimate falling just short of significance (p = 0.056, hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.01). This represents a 9% gain in the probability of surviving one year (57% in the placebo and 66% in the riluzole group). In secondary analyses of survival at separate time points, there was a significant survival advantage with riluzole 100 mg at six, nine, 12 and 15 months, but not at three or 18 months. There was a small beneficial effect on both bulbar and limb function, but not on muscle strength. There were no data on quality of life, but patients treated with riluzole remained in a more moderately affected health state significantly longer than placebo-treated patients (weighted mean difference 35.5 days, 95% confidence interval 5.9 to 65.0). A threefold increase in serum alanine transferase was more frequent in riluzole treated patients than controls (weighted mean difference 2.62, 95% confidence interval 1.59 to 4.31).

Authors' conclusions
Riluzole 100 mg daily is reasonably safe and probably prolongs survival by about two months in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. More studies are needed, especially to clarify its effect in older patients (over 75 years), and those with more advanced disease.

/pdf/riluzole-for-amyotrophic-lateral-sclerosis-als-motor-neuron-2tl1kbil1x.pdf

Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND).

Objective: To systematically review evidence bearing on the management of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods: The authors analyzed studies from 1998 to 2007 to update the 1999 practice parameter. Topics covered in this section include slowing disease progression, nutrition, and respiratory management for patients with ALS. Results: The authors identified 8 Class I studies, 5 Class II studies, and 43 Class III studies in ALS. Important treatments are available for patients with ALS that are underutilized. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and riluzole are particularly important and have the best evidence. More studies are needed to examine the best tests of respiratory function in ALS, as well as the optimal time for starting PEG, the impact of PEG on quality of life and survival, and the effect of vitamins and supplements on ALS. Recommendations: Riluzole should be offered to slow disease progression (Level A). PEG should be considered to stabilize weight and to prolong survival in patients with ALS (Level B). NIV should be considered to treat respiratory insufficiency in order to lengthen survival (Level B), and may be considered to slow the decline of forced vital capacity (Level C) and improve quality of life (Level C). Early initiation of NIV may increase compliance (Level C), and insufflation/exsufflation may be considered to help clear secretions (Level C). Neurology ® 2009;73:1218 –1226 GLOSSARY AAN American Academy of Neurology; ALS amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; FVC forced vital capacity; HFCWO high frequency chest wall oscillation; MIE mechanical insufflation/exsufflation; MIP maximal inspiratory pressure; NIV noninvasive ventilation; PCEF peak cough expiratory flow; Pdi transdiaphragmatic pressure; PEG percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; QOL quality of life; RIG radiologically inserted device; SNP sniff nasal pressure; TIV tracheostomy invasive ventilation.

https://n.neurology.org/content/neurology/73/15/1218.full.pdf

Practice parameter update: the care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: drug, nutritional, and respiratory therapies (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Increasing evidence has suggested that oxidative stress may be involved in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The antioxidant vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) has been shown to slow down the onset and progression of the paralysis in transgenic mice expressing a mutation in the superoxide dismutase gene found in certain forms of familial ALS. The current study, a double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, stratified, parallel-group clinical trial, was designed to determine whether vitamin E (5000 mg per day) may be efficacious in slowing down disease progression when added to riluzole. Methods. 160 patients in 6 German centres with either probable or definite ALS (according to the El Escorial Criteria) and a disease duration of less than 5 years, treated with riluzole, were included in this study and were randomly assigned to receive either alpha-tocopherol (5000 mg per day) or placebo for 18 months. The Primary outcome measure was survival, calculating time to death, tracheostomy or permanent assisted ventilation, according to the WFN-Criteria of clinical trials. Secondary outcome measures were the rate of deterioration of function assessed by the modified Norris limb and bulbar scales, manual muscle testing (BMRC), spasticity scale, ventilatory function and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP ALS/19). Patients were assessed at entry and every 4 months thereafter during the study period until month 16 and at a final visit at month 18. Vitamin E samples were taken for compliance check and Quality Control of the trial. For Safety, a physical examination was performed at baseline and then every visit until the treatment discontinuation at month 18. Height and weight were recorded at baseline and weight alone at the follow-up visits. A neurological examination as well as vital signs (heart rate and blood pressure), an ECG and VEP’s were recorded at each visit. Furthermore, spontaneously reported adverse experiences and serious adverse events were documented and standard laboratory tests including liver function tests performed. For Statistical Analysis, the population to be considered for the primary outcome measure was an “intent-to-treat” (ITT) population which included all randomised patients who had received at least one treatment dose (n = 160 patients). For the secondary outcome measures, a two way analysis of variance was performed on a patient population that included all randomised patients who had at least one assessment after inclusion. Results. Concerning the primary endpoint, no significant difference between placebo and treatment group could be detected either with the stratified Logrank or the Wilcoxon test. The functional assessments showed a marginal trend in favour of vitamin E, without reaching significance. Conclusion. Neither the primary nor the secondary outcome measures could determine whether a megadose of vitamin E is efficacious in slowing disease progression in ALS as an add-on therapy to riluzol. Larger or longer studies might be needed. However, administration of this megadose does not seem to have any significant side effects in this patient population.

B. Neundörfer

Papers

High dose vitamin E therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as add-on therapy to riluzole: results of a placebo-controlled double-blind study