The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread effects across the globe, and its causative agent, SARS-CoV-2, continues to spread. Effective interventions need to be developed to end this pandemic. Single and combination therapies with monoclonal antibodies have received emergency use authorization1-3, and more treatments are under development4-7. Furthermore, multiple vaccine constructs have shown promise8, including two that have an approximately 95% protective efficacy against COVID-199,10. However, these interventions were directed against the initial SARS-CoV-2 virus that emerged in 2019. The recent detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 in the UK11 and B.1.351 in South Africa12 is of concern because of their purported ease of transmission and extensive mutations in the spike protein. Here we show that B.1.1.7 is refractory to neutralization by most monoclonal antibodies against the N-terminal domain of the spike protein and is relatively resistant to a few monoclonal antibodies against the receptor-binding domain. It is not more resistant to plasma from individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 or sera from individuals who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. The B.1.351 variant is not only refractory to neutralization by most monoclonal antibodies against the N-terminal domain but also by multiple individual monoclonal antibodies against the receptor-binding motif of the receptor-binding domain, which is mostly due to a mutation causing an E484K substitution. Moreover, compared to wild-type SARS-CoV-2, B.1.351 is markedly more resistant to neutralization by convalescent plasma (9.4-fold) and sera from individuals who have been vaccinated (10.3-12.4-fold). B.1.351 and emergent variants13,14 with similar mutations in the spike protein present new challenges for monoclonal antibody therapies and threaten the protective efficacy of current vaccines.

/pdf/antibody-resistance-of-sars-cov-2-variants-b-1-351-and-b-1-1-3jty1gsdai.pdf

Antibody resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7.

The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 lineage was identified in October 2020 in India1–5. Since then, it has become dominant in some regions of India and in the UK, and has spread to many other countries6. The lineage includes three main subtypes (B1.617.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.617.3), which contain diverse mutations in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that may increase the immune evasion potential of these variants. B.1.617.2—also termed the Delta variant—is believed to spread faster than other variants. Here we isolated an infectious strain of the Delta variant from an individual with COVID-19 who had returned to France from India. We examined the sensitivity of this strain to monoclonal antibodies and to antibodies present in sera from individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 (hereafter referred to as convalescent individuals) or who had received a COVID-19 vaccine, and then compared this strain with other strains of SARS-CoV-2. The Delta variant was resistant to neutralization by some anti-NTD and anti-RBD monoclonal antibodies, including bamlanivimab, and these antibodies showed impaired binding to the spike protein. Sera collected from convalescent individuals up to 12 months after the onset of symptoms were fourfold less potent against the Delta variant relative to the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7). Sera from individuals who had received one dose of the Pfizer or the AstraZeneca vaccine had a barely discernible inhibitory effect on the Delta variant. Administration of two doses of the vaccine generated a neutralizing response in 95% of individuals, with titres three- to fivefold lower against the Delta variant than against the Alpha variant. Thus, the spread of the Delta variant is associated with an escape from antibodies that target non-RBD and RBD epitopes of the spike protein. The SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant partially evades neutralization by several monoclonal antibodies and by sera from individuals who have had COVID-19, but two doses of anti-COVID-19 vaccines still generate a strong neutralizing response.

/pdf/reduced-sensitivity-of-sars-cov-2-variant-delta-to-antibody-4vfjtit4rl.pdf

Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization.

A rapid increase in coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) cases due to the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in highly vaccinated populations has aroused concerns about the effectiveness of current vaccines. 

/pdf/covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-against-the-omicron-b-1-1-529-1t8j1ngj.pdf

Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant

The unprecedented public health and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been met with an equally unprecedented scientific response. Much of this response has focused, appropriately, on the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells, and in particular the binding of the spike (S) protein to its receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), and subsequent membrane fusion. This Review provides the structural and cellular foundations for understanding the multistep SARS-CoV-2 entry process, including S protein synthesis, S protein structure, conformational transitions necessary for association of the S protein with ACE2, engagement of the receptor-binding domain of the S protein with ACE2, proteolytic activation of the S protein, endocytosis and membrane fusion. We define the roles of furin-like proteases, transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and cathepsin L in these processes, and delineate the features of ACE2 orthologues in reservoir animal species and S protein adaptations that facilitate efficient human transmission. We also examine the utility of vaccines, antibodies and other potential therapeutics targeting SARS-CoV-2 entry mechanisms. Finally, we present key outstanding questions associated with this critical process.

/pdf/mechanisms-of-sars-cov-2-entry-into-cells-57gdww9ak6.pdf

Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the global COVID-19 pandemic. Rapidly spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants may jeopardize newly introduced antibody and vaccine countermeasures. Here, using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), animal immune sera, human convalescent sera and human sera from recipients of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, we report the impact on antibody neutralization of a panel of authentic SARS-CoV-2 variants including a B.1.1.7 isolate, chimeric strains with South African or Brazilian spike genes and isogenic recombinant viral variants. Many highly neutralizing mAbs engaging the receptor-binding domain or N-terminal domain and most convalescent sera and mRNA vaccine-induced immune sera showed reduced inhibitory activity against viruses containing an E484K spike mutation. As antibodies binding to spike receptor-binding domain and N-terminal domain demonstrate diminished neutralization potency in vitro against some emerging variants, updated mAb cocktails targeting highly conserved regions, enhancement of mAb potency or adjustments to the spike sequences of vaccines may be needed to prevent loss of protection in vivo.

/pdf/resistance-of-sars-cov-2-variants-to-neutralization-by-59hsixmpwe.pdf

Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants to neutralization by monoclonal and serum-derived polyclonal antibodies.

Recently identified SARS-CoV-2 variants Mu and C.1.2 have mutations in the receptor binding domain and N- and C-terminal domains that might confer resistance to natural and vaccine-elicited antibody. Analysis with pseudotyped lentiviruses showed that viruses with the Mu and C.1.2 spike proteins were partially resistant to neutralization by antibodies in convalescent sera and those elicited by mRNA and adenoviral vector-based vaccine-elicited antibodies. Virus with the C.1.2 variant spike, which is heavily mutated, was more neutralization-resistant than that of any of variants of concern. The resistance of the C.1.2 spike was caused by a combination of the RBD mutations N501Y, Y449H and E484K and the NTD mutations. Although Mu and C.1.2 were partially resistant to neutralizing antibody, neutralizing titers elicited by mRNA vaccination remained above what is found in convalescent sera and thus are likely to remain protective against severe disease. The neutralizing titers of sera from infection-experienced BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals, those with a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, were as much as 15-fold higher than those of vaccinated individuals without previous infection and effectively neutralized all of the variants. The findings demonstrate that individuals can raise a broadly neutralizing humoral response by generating a polyclonal response to multiple spike protein epitopes that should protect against current and future variants.

https://biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.19.463727v1.full.pdf

Neutralization of Mu and C.1.2 SARS-CoV-2 Variants by Vaccine-elicited Antibodies in Individuals With and Without Previous History of Infection

http://www.cell.com/article/S2589004223001694/pdf

Prophylaxis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection by an ACE2 receptor decoy in a preclinical animal model

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with highly mutated spike proteins has presented an obstacle to the use of monoclonal antibodies for the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We show that a high affinity receptor decoy protein in which a modified ACE2 ectodomain is fused to a single domain of an immunoglobulin heavy chain Fc region dramatically suppressed virus loads in mice upon challenge with a high dose of parental SARS-CoV-2 or Omicron variants. The decoy also potently suppressed virus replication when administered shortly post-infection. The decoy approach offers protection against the current viral variants and, potentially, against SARS-CoV-2 variants that may emerge with the continued evolution of the spike protein or novel viruses that use ACE2 for virus entry.

Prophylaxis and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection by an ACE2 Receptor Decoy

Vectored immunoprophylaxis was first developed as a means to establish engineered immunity to HIV through the use of an adeno-associated viral vector expressing a broadly neutralizing antibody. We have applied this concept to establish long-term prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 by adeno-associated and lentiviral vectors expressing a high affinity ACE2 decoy receptor. Administration of decoy-expressing AAV vectors based on AAV2.retro and AAV6.2 by intranasal instillation or intramuscular injection protected mice against high-titered SARS-CoV-2 infection. AAV and lentiviral vectored immunoprophylaxis was durable and active against recent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. The AAV vectors were also effective when administered up to 24 hours post-infection. Vectored immunoprophylaxis could be of value for immunocompromised individuals for whom vaccination is not practical and as a means to rapidly establish protection from infection. Unlike monoclonal antibody therapy, the approach is expected to remain active despite continued evolution viral variants.

/pdf/vectored-immunoprophylaxis-and-treatment-of-sars-cov-2-2cvclcoq.pdf

Vectored Immunoprophylaxis and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines induce humoral and cellular responses to epitopes in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, though the relative roles of antibodies and T cells in protection are not well understood. To understand the role of vaccine-elicited T cell responses in protection, we established a T cell–only vaccine using a DC-targeted lentiviral vector expressing single CD8+ T cell epitopes of the viral nucleocapsid, spike, and ORF1. Immunization of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2–transgenic mice with ex vivo lentiviral vector–transduced DCs or by direct injection of the vector induced the proliferation of functional antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, resulting in a 3-log decrease in virus load upon live virus challenge that was effective against the ancestral virus and Omicron variants. The Pfizer/BNT162b2 vaccine was also protective in mice, but the antibodies elicited did not cross-react on the Omicron variants, suggesting that the protection was mediated by T cells. The studies suggest that the T cell response plays an important role in vaccine protection. The findings suggest that the incorporation of additional T cell epitopes into current vaccines would increase their effectiveness and broaden protection.

/pdf/single-epitope-t-cell-based-vaccine-protects-against-sars-1xu005vz.pdf

Belinda M Dcosta

Papers

Neutralization of Mu and C.1.2 SARS-CoV-2 Variants by Vaccine-elicited Antibodies in Individuals With and Without Previous History of Infection

Prophylaxis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection by an ACE2 receptor decoy in a preclinical animal model

Prophylaxis and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection by an ACE2 Receptor Decoy

Vectored Immunoprophylaxis and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Single-epitope T cell–based vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a preclinical animal model