Showing papers by "Carl Erik Mogensen published in 1988"
TL;DR: It is hypothesized that IDDM patients who do not show considerable hyperfiltration in spite of poor metabolic control may be those who are to some extent protected against late diabetic nephropathy, but other mechanisms may also be involved in the renal protection of these patients, who survive long-term diabetes without nephropy.
Abstract: Hyperfiltration is a very characteristic feature in insulin-dependent diabetes. Hyperfiltration is to some extent associated with long-term glycemic control but the correlation is not very strong. Long-term hyperfiltration may play a role in the genesis of late diabetic nephropathy, but it is difficult to distinguish effects of hyperfiltration per se from effects of poor metabolic control. Long-term hyperfiltration without diabetes does not produce nephropathy. It is hypothesized that IDDM patients who do not show considerable hyperfiltration in spite of poor metabolic control may be those who are to some extent protected against late diabetic nephropathy, but other mechanisms may also be involved in the renal protection of these patients, who survive long-term diabetes without nephropathy. On the other hand, those with poor metabolic control combined with hyperfiltration are likely to develop nephropathy. In addition, it is suggested that the metabolic aberrations in diabetes, with the subsequent changes in the biochemistry of the glomerular wall, are permissive and absolutely required for the development of diabetic nephropathy. Of note, diabetic glomerulopathy in NIDDM occurs without significant hyperfiltration and extreme hyperfiltration in the one-kidney-model (without diabetes) does not produce nephropathy. Nonglycemic modalities of intervention, resulting in reduced hyperfiltration, e.g., low-protein diet or administration of somatostatin analogues, deserves interest as new potential ways of preventing or postponing diabetic nephropathy. Also intervention with aldose-reductase inhibitors may be an important therapeutic modality for those patients in whom good metabolic control is not obtainable. It is now well-established that antihypertensive treatment, including ACE-inhibition, reduces rate of decline in GFR in patients with already established nephropathy. In addition, protein excretion is diminished in IDDM patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy by antihypertensive treatment where GFR is well-preserved during treatment. No data are available for NIDDM.
80 citations
TL;DR: It is concluded that intensified glycemic control can favorably influence parasympathetic and somatosensory nerve function in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Abstract: Autonomic and somatosensory nerve function was studied in 24 insulin-dependent diabetic subjects (aged 29 +/- 7 yrs, diabetes duration 8 +/- 4 yr) randomly allocated to either continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; n = 12) or unchanged conventional insulin therapy (CIT; n = 12). Measures of glycemic control and somatosensory and autonomic nerve function were comparable in the two groups at the start. Glycemic control was significantly improved in the CSII group throughout study, whereas it remained unchanged in the CIT group. In the CIT group, vibratory perception threshold (VPT) of the great toe and the medial malleolus deteriorated, as did heart rate variation (HRV) at rest, at deep breathing (.05 less than P less than .06), and at standing. In contrast, CSII patients retained their VPT and HRV. Comparison of nerve function alterations during the 2-yr trial showed better preservation in CSII than in CIT patients of VPT in the great toe (0.8 +/- 1.7 vs. -1.4 +/- 1.9 V, P less than .01) and the medial malleolus (1.5 +/- 2.9 vs. -1.4 +/- 1.8 V, P less than .05) and of HRV at rest (10 +/- 24 vs. -13 +/- 22 ms, P less than .05) and at standing (-0.01 +/- 0.13 vs. -0.15 +/- 0.16 ms, P less than .05). We conclude that intensified glycemic control can favorably influence parasympathetic and somatosensory nerve function in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
67 citations
TL;DR: A condition of cardiac hyperfunction has been found in diabetes patients with no signs of ischemie heart disease and seems pronounced in diabetic patients developing microvascular disease (patients with preclinical nephropathy), probably secondarily to a condition of hyperperfusion in these patients.
Abstract: Cardiac function was studied by echocardiography in 80 insulin-dependent diabetic patients with no signs of ischemic heart disease and in 40 healthy control subjects. Echocardiographic findings were related to the urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE). In the diabetes group, fractional shortening of the left ventricle (FS) was 37.3% versus 34.3% (P less than .01) in the control group, whereas indices of preload and afterload were at the same levels as in control subjects. In diabetic patients with preclinical nephropathy (UAE 20-200 micrograms/min), FS was 41.1% compared to 37.0% (P less than .002) in patients with no signs of nephropathy (UAE less than 20 micrograms/min) and 34.8% (P less than .001) in patients with clinical nephropathy (UAE less than 200 micrograms/min). Furthermore, in patients with preclinical nephropathy, afterload was significantly decreased, whereas preload was at the same level as in the other two groups of UAE. In conclusion, a condition of cardiac hyperfunction has been found in diabetic patients with no signs of ischemic heart disease and seems pronounced in diabetic patients developing microvascular disease (patients with preclinical nephropathy), probably secondarily to a condition of hyperperfusion in these patients.
50 citations